Ahn, J.
(1997) Hankwuke myengsauy mwunpephwa hyensang yenkwu [A study of the phenomenon of grammarticization in the Korean noun]. Seoul, Korea: Hankuk Munhwasa.Google Scholar
Ahn, H.
(2001) Hyentay kwukeuy uyconmyengsa yenkwu [A study on bound nouns in Modern Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Yeklak.Google Scholar
Bearth, T.
(1997) Inferential and counter-inferential grammatical markers in Swahili dialogue. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere, 51 1, 1–22.Google Scholar
(1999) The inferential gap condition. Pragmatics, 9 1, 249–288.Google Scholar
Büring, D.
(2016) Intonation and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, M.
(2017) Hankwuke kyoyukul wihan phyohyenmwunhyeng ‘-nun kesita’uy tamhwakinung yenkwu – mwunpephwalul thonghay hoyktukhan yangthay uymilul pathangulo [A Study on the discourse function of expressive grammatical form ‘-neun geosida’ for teaching Korean: Based on modal meaning through grammaticalization]. Seoul, Korea: Hankuk University of Foreign Studies MA thesis.
Cho, Y.
(2021) Hankwuke phyohyenmwunhyeng ‘-un/-nun kesit’a tamhwakinung – sacek tayhwalul cwungsimulo [A Study on the Discourse Function of Korean pattern expression, ‘-eun/neun geosida’ – Focused on Private Conversations]. Language Facts and Perspective, 54 1, 281–309.Google Scholar
Declerck, R.
(1992) The inferential it is that-construction and its congeners. Lingua, 87 1, 203–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, G.
(1990) Inferentials: The story of forgotten evidential. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 15 1, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) The inferential construction. Pragmatics, 5 (3), 341–364.Google Scholar
(2001) Discourse functions of inferential sentences. Linguistics, 39 (3), 514–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, G., & Gatzkiewicz, L.
(2000) On the Spanish inferential construction ser que. Pragmatics, 10 (3), 301–322.Google Scholar
Den Dikken, M.
(2001) Specificational copular sentences and pseudo-clefts. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The syntax companion. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N.
(2007) Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1985) An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Heggie, L. A.
(1988) The syntax of copular structures. Los Angeles: University of Southern California PhD dissertation.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
(1991) Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heycock, C., & Kroch, A.
(2002) Topic, focus, and syntactic representations. In L. Mikkelsen & C. Potts (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL, 21 1 (pp. 101–125). MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hong, S. M.
(2006) Kwuke uyconmyengsa ‘kes’uy sacek yenkwu [A historical study on the bound noun ‘kes’ in Korean]. Korean Language and Literature, 44 1, 101–144.Google Scholar
Horn, L.
(1989) A natural history of negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Im, H.-P.
(1987) Kwukeuy caykwisa yenkwu [A study on the reflexive ‘caki’ in Korean]. Seoul: Sinkwu Munhwasa.Google Scholar
Jeon, H.-Y.
(2005) Kwue tamhwaey nathananun ‘-n kesita’uy hwayonguymi [On the forms of ‘-n kesi’ in spoken discourse of Korean]. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 46 1, 255–276.Google Scholar
Jung, S.
(2016) ‘-n kesita’uy theyksuthu kinungkwa uymi [On the discourse functions of written Korean ‘-n kesita’]. Textlinguistics, 41 1, 245–267.Google Scholar
Kae, M.
(2019) Hankwuke kwueuy ‘-n/nun kesita’ kwumwunuy phyohyen kinung yenkwu [A study on the expressive function of sentence structure ‘-n/nun kesita’ in spoken language]. Seoul, Korea: Sogang University MA thesis.
Kim, J.-B.
(2016) Copular constructions and asymmetries in the specificational pseudocleft constructions in Korean. Language & Linguistics, 17 (1), 89–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.-B., & Sells, P.
(2007) Some remarks on information structure and kes . Studies in Generative Grammar, 17(4), 479–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) On the Korean inferential cleft construction. Studies in Modern Grammar, 64 1, 45–72.Google Scholar
Koops, C.
(2007) Constraints on inferential constructions. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 207–224). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(2001) A framework for the analysis of cleft construction. Linguistics, 39 (3), 463–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 21, Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4 (1), 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) The control cycle: Why grammar is a matter of life and death. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2 1, 193–220.Google Scholar
(2004) Aspects of the grammar of finite clauses. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp 535–577). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) On the subject of impersonals. In M. Brdar, S. Th. Gries & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 179–218). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, E. H., & Shimojo, M.
(2016) Mismatch of topic between Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25 1, 81–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, D.-h.
(1991) Hyentay kwuke hyengsikmyengsa yenkwu [A study on the defective nouns in modern Korean]. Seoul: Seoul National University MA thesis.
Mikkelson, L.
(2004) Specifying who: On the structure, meaning, and use of specificational copular classes. Santa Cruz: University of California Santa Cruz Ph.D. dissertation.
(2005) Copular clauses: Specification, predication and equation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, K-S, & Ko, Y. K.
(1985) Phyocwun kwuke mwunpeplon [A reference grammar of Korean]. Seoul: Top Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Otake, Y.
(2002) Semantics and functions of the It is that-construction and the Japanese No da-construction. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 43 1, 139–153.Google Scholar
Park, C., & Yeon, J.
(2023a) Information structure in Korean: What’s new and what’s old. Journal of Pragmatics, 205 1, 16–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023b) Notes on word order variation in Korean. Pragmatics [Published online first]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023c) The factive, IHRC, and cleft constructions in Korean. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21 (1), 140–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, J.
(2022) Uymiuy ilpanhwawa thukswuhwa [Semantic generalization and specification]. Seoul: Unpublished Lecture Notes, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
Park, N.-R.
(2012) ‘-nun kesita’ kwumwun yenkwu [The study of grammaticalized ‘-nun kesita’ – focusing on the basis of relations between its grammatical meaning, discourse function, and speakers’ strategy]. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 65 1, 251–279.Google Scholar
Park, Y.-H.
(2002) 1950nyentay soseluy panecek kipep yenkwu: Sochangsep, Jangyonghak, Kimsenghanuy soselul cwungsimulo [A Study on the variations of irony in the 1950s’ literature: With reference to the Novels of Son Chang-seop, Jang Yong-hak, Kim Seong-han]. Seoul, Korea: Korea University PhD dissertation.
Rhee, S.
(2010) Subjectification in grammaticalization revisited. Studies in Modern Grammar, 61 1, 249–274.Google Scholar
Shin, S.
(1993) ‘kesita’ kwumwuney kwanhaye. [On the ‘kesita’ construction]. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 23 1, 119–158.Google Scholar
Song, M.
(1979) Eneuy cepchokkwa kansepyuhyengey tayhaye: Hyentayhankwukewa ilponeuy kyengwu [A typological approach to language contact and interference]. Song Sim Research Journal, 10 1, 29–62.Google Scholar
Son, W.
(2022) Hankwuke ‘-n kesita’ kwumwunkwa cwungkwuke ‘si … cek’ kwumwunuy tayco yenkwu [A comparative study on the construction ‘-n kesita’ in Korean and the construction ‘shi …. de’ in Chinese]. Bilingual Research, 86 1, 145–170.Google Scholar
(2023) Hankwuke ‘kes’ kwuseng yenkwu [A study on ‘kes’ in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Seoul National University PhD dissertation.
Strawson, P. F.
(1964) Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria, 301, 86–99.