Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Metaphor clusters in political discourse

 | Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
The paper explores the creative combination of metaphors, both complex and mixed. The data for the study are drawn from political discourse concerning the target concept of crisis. Building on the argument that constructional parameters facilitate metaphor clustering, the paper also focuses on adjectival constructions. The general claim that constructional parameters and figurative meaning are interdependent is thus supported. It is shown that as complex and mixed metaphors are created, they both reveal and emphasize the speakers’ political ideologies.
Keywords: adjectival construction, complex metaphors, image-schemas, metaphor clustering, mixed metaphors, political discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Aims of the study
  • 3.Metaphor clustering
    • 3.1Complex metaphors
    • 3.2Metaphor mixing
  • 4.Analysis and discussion
    • 4.1Complex metaphor clustering
    • 4.2Complex and mixed metaphor clustering
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Dictionaries
Published online: 29 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00198.ath
References (40)
References
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor analysis. London Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Stelma, J. (2004). Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2012). Shattering the Bell Jar: Metaphor, Gender, and Depression. Metaphor and Symbol, 27 1, 199–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corts, D., & Meyers, K. (2002). Conceptual clusters in figurative language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31 1, 391–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corts, D., & Pollio, H. (1999). Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol, 14 1, 81–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2003). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 161–206). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of purity and taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (Ed.). (2016). Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2006). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 239–268). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997a). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Linguistics Department, UC Berkeley.
(1997b). THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 1, 267–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 188–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampe, B. (Ed.). (2005) (in cooperation with J. E. Grady). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. [CLR 29]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 1, 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, V. (2003). Metaphor clusters in business media discourse: A Social Cognition Approach. Dissertation. Vienna University.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., & Schwartz, A. (1991). Master Metaphor List. Second draft copy. Cognitive Linguistics Group, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002). Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lizardo, O. (2012). The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning. Cognitive Linguistics, 23 (2), 367–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lonergan, J. E., & Gibbs, R. W. (2016). Tackling mixed metaphors in discourse. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 57–71). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Jοhn Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2016). Why mixed metaphors make sense. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Jοhn Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peña, S. (2003). Topology and cognition. What image-schemas reveal about the metaphorical language of emotions. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
(2008). Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (6), 1041–1066. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Jοhn Benjamins.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J. (2013). Metaphor, genre, and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 1, 41–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Jοhn Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dictionaries
Babiniotis, G. (2009). Etymological Dictionary of Modern Greek Language. Kendro Leksikologias. Athens.Google Scholar
Christiko Leksiko tis Neoellinikis Glossas (Usage-based Dictionary of Modern Greek). (2023). Academy of Athens. Athens.Google Scholar
Leksiko tis Koinis Neoellinikis (Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek). (1998). Institute for Modern Greek Studies. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar