Cover not available
Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 12:2 (2014) ► pp.443–469

Apenas

Aspectual reduction and subjective evaluation in Spanish

 | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
 | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
This paper explores both the polysemy and the development of the adverb apenas ‘barely hardly’ into a discourse marker of temporal proximity ‘just/recently’. In contrast to well-known expected tendencies in grammaticalization, apenas runs against the cannon. The subjective adverb apenas, that designates events carried out “with effort/difficulty”, changed into an objective connector signaling immediacy among events or proximity to the time of speech. The polysemy of apenas is accounted for both synchronically and diachronically, as the interaction between the force-dynamics configuration of the marker (Talmy, 1985, 1988) and the aspectual configuration of the verb. It is proposed that aspect determines the degree of subjectivity of the event where telicity triggers objective representations and these, in turn, led the way for the emergence of a discourse marker of temporal proximity.
Keywords: discourse marker, adverbs, subjectivity, temporal proximity, cognitive grammar, force dynamics
Published online: 31 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.12.2.07mal
References (46)
Alcina, J., & Blecua, J.M. (1975). (11th ed. 2001). Gramática española. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Arellanes, F. (2005). Los verbos de eventos instantáneos, los modificadores temporales y el copretérito en español. Hacia una concepción composicional de la aspectualidad. In M. Islas & C. Ramírez (Coords.), Sintaxis del español e interfase sintaxis-semántica. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, A. (2006). Adjectives and subjectification. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity (pp. 210–239). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bello, A. (1988). Gramática de la lengua castellana. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Beristain, H. (2006). Gramática estructural de la lengua española. Mexico: UNAM/Limusa.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (2001). What’s wrong with grammaticalization? In L. Campbel (Ed.), Grammaticalization: A critical assessment. Language Sciences, 231, 93–112.Google Scholar
Cornillie, B. (2007). Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi-)auxiliaries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Cuervo, R.J. (1981). Notas a la Gramática de la lengua castellana de Don Andrés Bello. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
De Miguel, E. (1999). El aspecto léxico. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Volume 31. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
DRAE. Real Academia Española. (2001). Diccionario de la lengua española (22nd edition). 
Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Giacalone-Ramat, A. (1998). Testing the boundaries of grammaticalization. In A. Giacalone-­Ramat & P.J. Hopper, (Eds.), The limits of grammaticalization (pp. 107–127). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction. Volume 11. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J.H. (1991). The last stages of grammatical elements: Contractive and expansive desemanticization. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Volume 11 (pp. 301–314). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1999). Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37 (6), 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde & H. Perridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald, (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). On degrammaticalization. In K. Burridge & B. Blake (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 2001 (pp. 163–179). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Islas, M. (2004). Verbos de emoción y aktionsart. Ph.D. Dissertation. Mexico: El Colegio de México.
Langacker, R.W. (1985). Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 109–150). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1990). Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. 
Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1992). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1990). How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics, 261, 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1995)[1982]. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: LINCOM Europa(originally published as Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch, Vol. 1. University of Cologne: Arbeiten des Kölner Universalienprojekts, 49).Google Scholar
Matos, A.P. (2007). The meaning of approximative adverbs: Evidence from European Portuguese. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio: The Ohio State University.
Moliner, M. (2007). Diccionario de uso del español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. (1998). Language form and language function. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Norde, M. (2002). The final stages of grammaticalization: Affixhood and beyond. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 45–81). Amsterdam: John Bejamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C. (1997). Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
. (2000). Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalisation. Topics in English Linguistics, 311, 233–260.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. (1973). Esbozo de una gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Seco, M. (1972). Gramática esencial del español. Madrid: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Force dynamics in language and thought. Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society, 211, 293–337.Google Scholar
. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 121, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C. (1988). Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 406–416). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 571, 33–65.Google Scholar
. (1995). Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In S. Wright & D. Stein (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation (pp. 31–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change: A study in subjectification. In A. Blank & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 177–196). Berlin/Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). Exaptation and grammaticalization. In M. Akimoto (Ed.), Linguistic studies based on corpora (pp. 133–156). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Dasher, R.B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Heine, B. (Eds.). (1991). Approaches to grammaticalization, Volume 11. 
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R., & LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Li, Ningxian
2024. The procedural meaning of Spanish adverb apenas. Journal of Pragmatics 225 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.