Cover not available
Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 27:2 (2014) ► pp.514–536

Competing constraints on the variable placement of direct object clitics in Mexico City Spanish

 | The Ohio State University
 | The Pennsylvania State University
We utilize variationist methodology to explore the conventionalization and pragmatics of 3rd person direct object clitic placement in Spanish periphrastic constructions. Analysis of 652 tokens extracted from three Mexico City speech corpora indicates that while proclitic position is the majority variant, the rate of enclitic position depends on particular [finite + non-finite verb] constructions, distinguished by frequency measures and more grammaticalized meanings. At the same time, enclisis is favored by propositional or non-referential direct objects and by direct objects of low topic persistence, measured by subsequent mentions. In contrast, proclitic position is favored more by inanimate than human referents, especially those that show topic persistence and whose previous mention was in the syntactic role of direct object in the same or preceding clause. These quantitative patterns suggest that proclisis indicates prototypical DOs in non-prototypical use, i.e. topical inanimates. Thus, despite conventionalization of the general proclitic schema, particular constructions and semantic-pragmatic considerations are operative factors in the variation.
Keywords: clitics, morphosyntactic variation, Mexican Spanish, pragmatics, usage-based grammar
Published online: 8 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.2.13sch
References (46)
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 211, 435–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing non-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. (2008). Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, E., & Rivas, J. (2012). Grammatical relation probability: How usage patterns shape analogy. Language Variation and Change, 241, 317–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B. Joseph & R. Handa (Eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 821, 529–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M., & Nikolaeva, I., (2011). Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (1995). Analyzing syntactic variation with computer-based corpora: The case of Modern Spanish clitic climbing. Hispania, 781, 370–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998). The evolution of Spanish clitic climbing: A corpus-based approach. Studia Neophilologica, 691, 251–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. (Ed.). (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-linguistic study (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez Seibane. S. (2013). Los pronombres átonos (le, la, lo) en el español: aproximación histórica. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Gudmestad, A. (2006). Clitic climbing in Caracas Spanish: A sociolinguistic study of ir and querer . IULC Working Papers Online, 06–031.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J., & Traugott, E.C. (2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 451, 715–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Quantitative reasoning in linguistics. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K.J. Mattheier & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 6–22). 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1995[1982]). Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lope Blanch, J.M. (Ed.). (1971). El habla de la ciudad de México: Materiales para su estudio. Mexico City: UNAM.Google Scholar
. (Ed.). (1976). El habla popular de México: Materiales para su estudio. Mexico City: UNAM.Google Scholar
Martín Butragueño, P., & Lastra, Y. (Eds.). (2012). Corpus sociolingüístico de la ciudad de México. Vol. II: Nivel medio. Mexico: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Myhill, J. (1988a). The grammaticalization of auxiliaries: Spanish clitic climbing. BLS, 141, 352–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1988b). Variation in Spanish clitic climbing. In T.J. Walsh (Ed.), Synchronic and diachronic approaches to linguistic variation and change (pp. 227–250). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. (1992). Typological discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. (2005). Quantitative methods of discourse analysis. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann & R.G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 471–498). Berlin: de Gruyer.Google Scholar
Næss, Å. (2007). Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuijsen, D. (2006). Cambios en la colocación de los pronombres átonos. In C. Company Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal, Vol. 2, (pp. 1339–1404). Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Paolillo, J.C. (2002). Analyzing linguistic variation: Statistical models and methods. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Reig Alamillo, A. (2008). Cross-dialectal variability in propositional anaphora: A quantitative and pragmatic study of null objects in Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. PhD Dissertation. The Ohio State University.
. (2009). Cross-dialectal variation in propositional anaphora: null objects and propositional lo in Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 211, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1988a). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In F.J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey (pp. 140–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1988b). Variable rules. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar & K.J. Mathheier (Eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 984–997). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., Tagliamonte, S., & Smith, E. (2012). Goldvarb LION: A variable rule application for Macintosh. University of Toronto. URL [URL].Google Scholar
Schwenter, S.A. (2006). Null objects across South America. In T.L. Face & C.A. Klee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 23–36). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. (2014). Two kinds of differential object marking in Portuguese and Spanish. In P. Amaral & A. Carvalho (Eds.), Portuguese/Spanish interfaces (pp. 37–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S.A., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2014). Variability in Spanish clitic placement: Animacy and topicality. Paper presented at 7th International Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (WSS7), University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 4.
Shain, C., & Tonhauser, J. (2011). The synchrony and diachrony of differential object marking in Paraguayan Guaraní. Language Variation and Change, 221, 321–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1984). Semantic and pragmatic factors in syntactic change. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical syntax (pp. 555–73). Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinnott, S., & Smith, E. (2006). Subir o no subir: A look at clitic climbing in Spanish. Paper presented at Ohio Latinamericanist Conference.
Spaulding, R.K. (1927). Puedo hacerlo versus lo puedo hacer and similar cases. Hispania, 101, 343–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2005). Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 113–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.A. (2006). Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R. (1999). Construction frequency and reductive change: Diachronic and register variation in Spanish clitic climbing. Language Variation and Change, 141, 143–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (in press). Gradual loss of analyzability: diachronic priming effects. In A. Adli, G. Kaufmann, & M. García (Eds.), Variation in language: usage-based vs. system-based approaches. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Tottie, G. (1991). Lexical diffusion in syntactic change: Frequency as a determinant in the development of negation in English. In D. Kastovsky (Ed.), Historical English syntax, (pp. 439–467). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

HOFF, MARK
2023. The Role of Frequency in Morphosyntactic Variation. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Manjón-Cabeza Cruz, Antonio
2023. La posición de clíticos argumentales con complejos verbales en un corpus oral. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 36:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Martín Gómez, Antonio
2023. The effects of age and experience with input in the acquisition of clitic climbing in heritage and L2 Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 27:4 ► pp. 432 ff. DOI logo
Shin, Naomi
2022. Structured variation in child heritage speakers' grammars. Language and Linguistics Compass 16:12 DOI logo
Shin, Naomi & Karen Miller
2022. Children’s Acquisition of Morphosyntactic Variation. Language Learning and Development 18:2 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Requena, Pablo E. & Grant M. Berry
2021. Cross-linguistic influence in L1 processing of morphosyntactic variation: Evidence from L2 learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:1 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Viner, Kevin Martillo
2021. Generational differences in the placement of clitic se in New York City Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:5 ► pp. 1460 ff. DOI logo
Requena, Pablo E.
2020. A Usage-Based Perspective on Spanish Variable Clitic Placement. Languages 5:3 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Requena, Pablo E.
2024. Early acquisition of syntactic variation: Lexical conditioning of Spanish variable clitic placement. Language Variation and Change 36:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Limerick, Philip P.
2018. Variable clitic placement in US Spanish. In Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 15], ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Limerick, Philip P.
2022. New considerations for variable clitic placement in Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 650 ff. DOI logo
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2018. Traces of demonstrative grammaticalization in Spanish variable subject expression. In Functionalist and usage-based approaches to the study of language [Studies in Language Companion Series, 192], ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Shin, Naomi L., Pablo E. Requena & Anita Kemp
2017. Bilingual and Monolingual Children’s Patterns of Syntactic Variation: Variable Clitic Placement in Spanish. In Language Development and Disorders in Spanish-speaking Children [Literacy Studies, 14], ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.