Part of
Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in EnglishEdited by Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13] 2004
► pp. 171–210
Edited by Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13] 2004
► pp. 171–210
Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized?
On the limits of corpus data — and the importance of intuition
Using extensive corpus data, this paper investigates whether low-frequency complex prepositions (e.g. by dint of, in conformity with) can be interpreted as units of language structure even though they cannot have undergone the processes typical of more frequent grammaticalizing constructions. I critically evaluate previous treatments of frequency and discuss alternative modes of interpreting corpus data, e.g. by drawing a distinction between conceptual and absolute frequency as reflections of the cognitive representation of linguistic items. I also suggest that formal properties of grammaticalizing constructions may play an important role and that “grammaticalization by analogy” may account for the establishment of low-frequency units of language. Finally, the paper offers a detailed discussion of the methodological issues involved in using corpus data to study low-frequency phenomena.
Cited by (34)
Cited by 34 other publications
Primerano, Antoine & Miriam Bouzouita
2024. La gramaticalización de los futuros y condicionales en el navarroaragonés de los siglos xiii y
xiv. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 59:1 ► pp. 143 ff. 
Lorenz, David
2023. David Correia Saavedra:Measurements of grammaticalization: Developing a quantitative index for the study of grammatical change. Folia Linguistica 57:3 ► pp. 763 ff.
Marttinen Larsson, Matti
2023. Modelling incipient probabilistic grammar change in real time: the grammaticalisation of possessive pronouns in European Spanish locative adverbial constructions. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2022. Chapter 7. Complex prepositions of analogy and contrast in English. In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73], ► pp. 193 ff.
Moore, Emma
2021. The Social Meaning of Syntax. In Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation, ► pp. 54 ff.
Ebert, Christian
2019. Der Rückgang pränominaler Genitive in deranstatt-Konstruktion. Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte 10:1 ► pp. 219 ff.
Fagard, Benjamin & Alexandru Mardale
2019. Les prépositions complexes du roumain – approche sur corpus. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 54:1 ► pp. 176 ff.
Piunno, Valentina & Vittorio Ganfi
2019. Usage-based account of Italian Complex Prepositions denoting the Agent. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 54:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
陈, 功
2019. The Study of Complex Prepositions in the Writings of EFL Learners under the View of Grammaticalization—Take PNP Construction as an Example. Modern Linguistics 07:03 ► pp. 283 ff.
Granvik, Anton
2018. The development of the conditional caso construction in Spanish. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 205 ff.
Kaatari, Henrik
2018. On the syntactic status of I 'm sure. Corpora 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Neels, Jakob & Stefan Hartmann
2018. Reduction or expansion? A bit of both. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 137 ff.
Hilpert, Martin & David Correia Saavedra
2017. Why are grammatical elements more evenly dispersed than lexical elements? Assessing the roles of text frequency and semantic generality. Corpora 12:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
D'Arcy, Alexandra
Levon, Erez & Isabelle Buchstaller
2015. Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change 27:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
Neels, Jakob
2015. The history of the quasi-auxiliaryuse(d)to. Journal of Historical Linguistics 5:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Neels, Jakob
2020. Lifespan change in grammaticalisation as frequency-sensitive automation: William Faulkner and thelet aloneconstruction. Cognitive Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 339 ff.
Sommerer, Lotte
2015. The influence of constructions in grammaticalization. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 107 ff.
Van Rompaey, Tinne, Kristin Davidse & Peter Petré
Verveckken, Katrien & Nicole Delbecque
2015. On the development of binominal quantifiers in Spanish: the notion of lexical persistence revisited. CogniTextes 13:Volume 13
Bybee, Joan L.
2014. Analytic and holistic processing
in the development of constructions. In Language in Interaction [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 12], ► pp. 303 ff.
Codita, Viorica
2013. Hápax y otras construcciones prepositivas de frecuencia escasa en la "Primera partida". Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española :8 ► pp. 63 ff.
Forchini, Pierfranca
2013. A diachronic study of familiarizers (‘man’, ‘guys’, ‘buddy’, ‘dude’) in movie language. Perspectives 21:4 ► pp. 504 ff.
BERLAGE, EVA
2012. At the interface of grammaticalisation and lexicalisation: the case of take prisoner. English Language and Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Legallois, Dominique & Jacques François
2011. La Linguistique fondée sur l'usage : parcours critique. Travaux de linguistique n°62:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Loiseau, Sylvain
2011. Les faits statistiques comme objectivation ou comme interprétation : statistiques et modèles basés sur l'usage. Travaux de linguistique n°62:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Loiseau, Sylvain
2015. Les différentes formes de la fréquence textuelle : proposition d’inventaire. Langages N° 197:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
BREBAN, TINE
2009. Structural persistence: a case based on the grammaticalization of English adjectives of difference. English Language and Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Mourón‐Figueroa, Cristina
2008. A Semantic Analysis ofby‐Phrases in the York Cycle1. Studia Neophilologica 80:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Brems, Lieselotte
2007. The Grammaticalization of Small Size Nouns. Journal of English Linguistics 35:4 ► pp. 293 ff.
[no author supplied]
2013. Lessons Learned from Research on Quotation. In Quotatives, ► pp. 245 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.