Cover not available
Part of
Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber
Edited by Viviana Cortes and Eniko Csomay
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66] 2015
► pp. ix–xiv

Foreword

Published online: 14 January 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.002for
References (33)
References
Aijmer, Karen. 2002. English Discourse Particles. Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas, Khosravinik, Majid, Krzyżanowski, Michael, McEnery, Tony & Wodak, Ruth. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19(3): 273-306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing, Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Eward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana. 2004. If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371-405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263-86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(1): 2-20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald. A. 1998. Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication and culture. ELT Journal 52(1): 43-56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 1995. Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics 16(2): 141-158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, William. 1992. The importance of corpus linguistics to understanding the nature of language. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics, Jan Svartvik (ed.), 79–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cook, Guy. 1998. The uses of reality: A reply to Ronald Carter. ELT Journal 52(1): 57-64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dudley-Evans, Tony & St John, Maggi Jo. 1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan. 2009. Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Handford, Michael. 2010. The Language of Business Meetings. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2013. Women, Men and Politeness. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Steven. 2002. Antonymy: A Corpus-based Perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2000. Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning 50(4): 675-724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Rayson, Paul & Wilson, Andrew. 2001. Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London: Longman.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 2008. Accessing and interpreting corpus information in the teacher education context. Language Teaching 41(4): 563-574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald. 1997. Written and spoken vocabulary. In Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition, Pedagogy, Norbert Schmitt & Michael McCarthy (eds), 20-39. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony. 2001. Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Terrence Frederick. 1957. The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: A situational statement. Hespéris XLIV: 31-71.Google Scholar
Römer, Ute. 2008. Corpora and language teaching. In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, Vol. 1, Anke Lüdeling & Kytö Merja (eds), 112-130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 2008. Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2007. Conversation in Context: A Corpus-Driven Approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2010. What can a corpus tell us about pragmatics? In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Anne O’Keeffe & Michael McCarthy (eds), 288-301. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan. 1992. Lexis in English language corpora. In Euralex ’92 Proceedings, Hannu Tomola, Krista Varantola, Tarja Salmi-Tolonen, & Jurgen Schopp (eds), 17-31. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry. 2000. On the limitations of applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 21(1): 2-25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar