Cover not available
Part of
Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber
Edited by Viviana Cortes and Eniko Csomay
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66] 2015
► pp. 49–78

On the complexity of academic writing

Disciplinary variation and structural complexity

ORCID logo

Building upon renewed research on the pervasive phrasal or nominal style of academic writing, I investigate the use of phrasal compression and clausal elaboration structures in research articles across six academic disciplines. Results indicate that all disciplines rely on phrasal complexity features to a much greater extent than clausal features. However, these results also show systematic patterns of variation across disciplines, with hard sciences (physics, biology) exhibiting the densest use of phrasal features, followed by social sciences (applied linguistics, political science), and then humanities disciplines (history, philosophy). Furthermore, the patterns for clausal features displayed the opposite trend: most frequent in humanities and least frequent in hard sciences. Keywords: Complexity; clausal elaboration; phrasal compression; disciplinary writing; informational discourse; research articles

Published online: 14 January 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.03gra
References
Afros, Elena & Schryer, Catherine
2009 Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes 28: 58-68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aktas, Rahime & Cortes, Viviana
2008 Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 3-14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banks, David
2005 On the historical origins of nominalized process in scientific text. English for Specific Purposes 24: 347-357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The Development of Scientific Writing: Linguistic Features and Historical Context. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992/2001 On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15, 133-163. Reprinted in In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 215-240. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Clark, Victoria
2002 Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In English Historical Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223], Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María José López-Couso (eds), 43-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
2009 Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
2001 Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 108-137. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2010 Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 2-20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language & Linguistics 15(2): 223–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104-134.Google Scholar
2013b Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT Test: A Lexico-grammatical Analysis [TOEFLiBT Research Report (TOEFL eBT-19)]. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, Reppen, Randi, Byrd, Pat & Helt, Marie
2002 Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36: 9-48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany & Poonpon, Kornwipa
2011a Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 5-35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany, Honkapohja, Alpo & Pahta, Päivi
2011b Prepositional modifiers in early English medical prose: A study ON their historical development IN noun phrases. In Communicating Early English Manuscripts, Päivi Pahta & Andreas Jucker (eds), 197-211. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan
1996 Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in Biology and History. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Diani, Giuliana
2008 Emphasizers in spoken and written academic discourse: The case of really . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(3): 296-321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Zhihui, Schleppegrell, Mary & Cox, Beverly
2006 Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research 38(3): 247-273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sheena & Nesi, Hilary
2012 A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics 34(1): 1-29.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany
2011 Exploring Academic Writing through Corpus Linguistics: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
2013 More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora 8(2): 153-181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groom, Nicholas
2005 Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4: 257-277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K
1979 Differences between spoken and written language: Some implications for literacy teaching. In Communication through reading: Proceedings of the 4th Australian Reading Conference, Vol. 2, Glenda Page, John Elkins & Barrie O’Connor (eds), 37-52. Adelaide SA: Australian Reading Association.Google Scholar
1989 Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 The Language of Science. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Harwood, Nigel
2005a ‘I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever’: Discussing methods in computing science using I . English for Specific Purposes 24: 243-267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b ‘We do not seem to have a theory…the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 26(3): 343-375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hemais, Barbara
2001 The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals. English for Specific Purposes 20: 39-59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewings, Martin & Hewings, Ann
2002 “It is interesting to note that...”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes 21: 367-383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1996 Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17(4): 433-454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Talking to students: Metadiscourse in Introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes 18(1): 3-26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 23: 215-239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4-21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 116-127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly
2005 Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 24:123-139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2006 Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journals of English for Academic Purposes 5: 19-36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, David & Chen, Sylvia
2009 Making a bigger deal of the smaller words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 149-165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, Jill & Parkinson, Jean
2014 Getting to grips with noun groups. ELT Journal 68(2): 145-154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesi, Hilary & Gardner, Sheena
2012 Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Jean & Musgrave, Jill
2014 Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 48-59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peacock, Matthew
2006 A cross-disciplinary comparison of boosting in research articles. Corpora 1(1): 61-84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, Ute & Swales, John
2010 The Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, David
2002 Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary
2001 Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education 12(4): 431-459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silver, Marc
2006 Language across Disciplines: Towards a Critical Reading of Contemporary Academic Discourse. Boca Raton FL: Brown Walker Press.Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, William
1994 Some characteristics and functions of grammatical subjects in scientific discourse. Written Communication 11(4): 534-564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warchal, K
2010 Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses: Consensus-building strategies in written academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 140-150 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webber, Pauline
1994 The function of questions in different medical journal genres. English for Specific Purposes 13(3): 257-268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Rulon
1960 Nominal and verbal style. In Style in Language, Thomas Sebeok (ed.), 213-22. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Williams, Ian
1996 A contextual study of lexical verbs in two types of medical research report: Clinical and Experimental. English for Specific Purposes 15(3): 175-197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Hu, Yiyang & Qingshun He
2023. A Corpus-Based Study of the Distributions of Adnominals Across Registers and Disciplines. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Seoane, Elena & Cristina Suárez-Gómez
2020. Elaboration, compression and explicitness across sub-registers of popular and academic writing in Hong Kong English. Register Studies 2:2 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Elizaveta
2022. Clausal complexity of expert and student writing: a corpus-based analysis of papers in social sciences. Language Learning in Higher Education 12:2 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Learning the Language of Dentistry [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 93], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.