Cover not available
Part of
Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston
Edited by Nicholas Groom, Maggie Charles and Suganthi John
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 73] 2015
► pp. 283–300

Chapter 12. Does Britain need any more foreign doctors? Inter-analyst consistency and corpus-assisted (critical) discourse analysis

| Lancaster University

It is argued that corpus methods help to reduce analyst bias in conducting (critical) discourse analysis. This paper describes an experiment whereby five analysts were independently given a British newspaper corpus about foreign doctors and asked to analyse how such doctors were represented. The resulting five reports were analysed to compare which findings were shared, which varied and which factors may help predict variance or productivity of analysis. Considerable variance was found in the findings of the five analysts, meaning we cannot claim that corpus approaches to critical discourse analysis completely remove bias. However, such approaches seem effective at identifying ‘majority’ patterns and giving an overall picture of the data.

Published online: 30 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.13bak
References
Anthony, L
2011 AntConc (Version 3.2.2). [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. [URL]Google Scholar
Baker, P
2006 Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, A & Wodak, R
2008 A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse and Society 19(3): 273-306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, J
2003 Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burr, V
1995 An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, R
1999 Discourse studies and the ideology of ‘Liberalism’. Discourse Studies 3(1): 259-295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N
1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1995 Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fowler, R., Hodge, G., Kress, G. & Trew, T
(eds) 1979 Language and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hardt-Mautner, G
1995 Only Connect: Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics [UCREL Technical paper 5]. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Hunston, S
1999 Corpus evidence for disadvantage: Issues in critical interpretation. Paper read at the BAAL/CUP seminar ‘Investigating discourse practices through corpus research: Methods, findings and applications.’ University of Reading, May 1999.
2002 Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurthy, R
1996 Ethnic, racial and tribal: The language of racism? In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (eds), 129-149. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marchi, A. & Taylor, C
2009 If on a winter’s night two researchers... A challenge to assumptions of soundness of interpretation. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 3(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Mautner, G
2007 Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly . Language in Society 36(1): 51-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, K. & Coffin, C
2004 Checking overinterpretation and underinterpretation: Help from corpora in critical linguistics. In Applying English Grammar: Corpus and Functional Approaches, C. Coffin, A. Hewings & K. O’Halloran (eds), 275–297. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Partington, A
2004 Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. In Corpora and Discourse, A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (eds), 11-20. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rayson, P
2008 From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 519-549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, M
2008 WordSmith Tools, Version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M
1994 Grammar, text and ideology: Computer-assisted methods in the linguistics of representation. Applied Linguistics 15(2): 201-23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Text and Corpus Analysis. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T
2008 Discourse and Context: A Socio-cognitive Approach. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T
1996 The representation of social actors. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (eds), 32–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1997 Representing social action. Discourse and Society 6(1): 81–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H.G
1998 The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics 19(1): 136-151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Baker, Paul
2018. Keywords. In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87], ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Baker, Paul & Robbie Love
2018. Corpus Linguistics and Sexuality. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, DOI logo
Bednarek, Monika, Martin Schweinberger & Kelvin K. H. Lee
2024. Corpus-based discourse analysis: from meta-reflection to accountability. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 DOI logo
Franklin, Emma, Joanna Gavins & Seth Mehl
2022. “I don’t think education is the answer”: A corpus-assisted ecolinguistic analysis of plastics discourses in the UK. Journal of World Languages 8:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Fuoli, Matteo & Christopher Hart
2018. Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study. Discourse & Society 29:5 ► pp. 514 ff. DOI logo
Gillings, Mathew, Gerlinde Mautner & Paul Baker
2023. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies, DOI logo
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2020. Language use before and after Stonewall: A corpus-based study of gay men’s pre-Stonewall narratives. Discourse Studies 22:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Pei, Jiamin & Le Cheng
2024. Representations of 5G in the Chinese and British press: a corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Rheindorf, Markus
2019. Introduction. In Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Toolan, Michael
2016. Peter Black, Christopher Stevens, class and inequality in the Daily Mail. Discourse & Society 27:6 ► pp. 642 ff. DOI logo
Toolan, Michael
2018. The Language of Inequality in the News, DOI logo
Yan Eureka Ho, Sin & Peter Crosthwaite
2018. Exploring stance in the manifestos of 3 candidates for the Hong Kong Chief Executive election 2017: Combining CDA and corpus-like insights. Discourse & Society 29:6 ► pp. 629 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.