Cover not available
Part of
Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 1–12

Chapter 1
Present applications and future directions in pattern-driven approaches to corpus linguistics

| Linnaeus University
| University of Glasgow
Article outline
  • 1.Corpus linguistics today
  • 2.Pattern-driven research into language
  • 3.Book overview
  • 4.Pattern-driven linguistics: Future directions
  • References
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.01tyr
References
Ädel, Annelie & Erman, Britt
2012 Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 31: 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1998 On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In Phraseology. Theory, Analysis and Applications, Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), 101–122. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2014 Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries. [URL]
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2009 Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buerki, A.
2010 All sorts of change: A preliminary typology of change in multi-word sequences in the Swiss Text Corpus. Presented at FLaRN 2010, Paderborn, Germany.
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
2006 Cambridge Grammar of English. A Comprehensive Guide. Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie
2007 Concgramming: A corpus-driven approach to learning the phraseology of discipline-specific texts. CORELL: Computer Resources for Language Learning 1: 22–35.Google Scholar
Conklin, Kathy & Schmitt, Norbert
2008 Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29(1): 72–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortes, Viviana
2004 Lexical bundles in published and student writing in history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2002 Lexical bundles in Early Modern English: A window into the speech-related language of the past. In Sounds, Words, Texts, Change. Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (11 ICEHL) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 224], Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya & Elena Seoane (eds), 45–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2010 Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011 A new kind of dictionary for Shakespeare’s plays: An immodest proposal. In Stylistics and Shakespeare’s Language: Transdisciplinary Approaches, Mireille Ravassat & Jonathan Culpeper (eds), 58–83. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fletcher, William H.
2003/2004 Phrases in English. [URL]> (1 May 2017).
2006 Concordancing the web: Promise and problems, tools and techniques. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web [Language and Computers 59], Marianne Hundt, Nadja Nesselhauf & Carolin Biewer (eds), 25–45. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill, Hunston, Susan & Manning, Elizabeth
1996 Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns, 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
1998 Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns, 1: Nouns and Adjectives. London HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Fuster-Márquez, Miguel
2014 Lexical bundles and phrase frames in the language of hotel websites. English Text Construction 7(1): 84–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2011 Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz
2015 Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes 38: 23–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greaves, Christopher & Warren, Martin
2007 Concgramming: A computer-driven approach to learning the phraseology of English. ReCALL Journal 17(3): 287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Mukherjee, Joybrato
2010 Lexical gravity across varieties of English: An ICE-based study of N-Grams in Asian Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4): 520–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill
2000 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2008 As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
2013 The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs. Standardisation and Lexical Bundles, 1380–1560. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja, Rydén, Mats & Smitterberg, Erik
2006 Nineteenth-century English: Stability and Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela, González-Díaz, Victorina & Smith, Catherine
(eds) 2009 Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, Liverpool 20–23 July 2009. [URL]> (1 May 2017).
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio
2006 Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F.
2014 Corpus-based and corpus-driven approaches to linguistic analysis: one and the same? In Developments in English: Expanding Electronic Evidence, Irma Taavitsainen, Merja Kytö, Claudia Claridge & Jeremy Smith (eds), 14–28. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan & Morley, John
2004 From frequency to ideology: Investigating word and cluster/bundle frequency in political debate. In Practical Applications in Language and Computers. PALC 2003, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), 179–192. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Salazar, Danica
2014 Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Michael
1997 PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System 25(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Shrefler, Nathan
2011 Lexical bundles and German bibles. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(1): 89–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Mauranen, Anna
2006 Linear Unit Grammar: Integrating Speech and Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
2002 Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(2): 215–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael & Barth, Isabel
2003 Using recurrent phrases and text-type discriminators: A quantitative method and some findings. Functions of Language 10(1): 61–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi
(eds) 2010 Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang
2005 My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
2001 Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Antoine, Derwing, Bruce, Libben, Gary & Westbury, Chris
2011 Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning 61(2): 569–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Yorick
2005 REVEAL: The notion of anomalous texts in a very large corpus. Tuscan Word Centre International Workshop. Certosa di Pontignano, Tuscany, Italy, 31 June–3 July.
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Lutzky, Ursula
2024. “Doesn’t Really Answer My Question . . .”: Exploring Customer Service Interactions on Twitter. International Journal of Business Communication 61:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Nevala, Minna & Jukka Tyrkkö
2023. Chapter 7. From criminal lunacy to mental disorder. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Tyrkkö, Jukka
2019. Kinship references in the British Parliament, 1800–2005. In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 306], ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.