Part of
Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change
Edited by Richard J. Whitt
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 85] 2018
► pp. 219240
References (29)
Corpora
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990–present. <[URL]>Google Scholar
. 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810–2009. <[URL]>Google Scholar
References
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 2–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Edith A. 1937. Mean sentence length compared with long and short sentences as a reliable measure of language development. Child Development 8(1): 69–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorgeloh, Heidrun. 2005. Patterns of agentivity and narrativity in early science discourse. In Opening Windows in Discourse and Texts from the Past [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 134], Janne Skaffari, Matti Peikola, Ruth Carroll, Risto Hiltunen & Brita Warvik (eds), 83–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 2011. Rhetorical Style: The Uses Of Language In Persuasion. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fries, Udo. 2010. Sentence length, sentence complexity and the noun phrase in 18th-century news publications. In Language Change and Variation from Old English to Late Modern English [Linguistic Insights 114], Merja Kytö, John Scahill & Harumi Tanabe (eds), 21–33. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gross, Alan G., Harmon, Joseph E. & Reidy, Michael S. 2002. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hames, Tim & Rae, Nicol C. 1996. Governing America: History, Culture, Institutions, Organisation, Policy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hult, Christine A. 2015. The Handy English Grammar Answer Book. Canton MI: Visible Ink Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Denison, David & Schneider, Gerold. 2012. Relative complexity in scientific discourse. English Language and Linguistics 16(2): 209–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klare, George R. 1963. The Measurement of Readability. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Edwin H. 1894. The History of the English Paragraph. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2005. The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1998. Corpora and the study of major varieties in English: Issues and results. In The Major Varieties of English: Papers from MAVEN 97, Hans Lindquist, Staffan Klintborg, Magnus Levin & Maria Estling (eds), 139–157. Växjö: Acta Wexionensia.Google Scholar
. 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, Gordon P. 2002. English for Life? Teaching English as a Second Language in Sub-Saharan Africa with Special Reference to Uganda. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.Google Scholar
Miller, Raymond D. 1908. Coordination and the comma. PMLA 23(2): 316–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudnicka, Karolina. In preparation. In preparation. The Statistics of Obsolescence: Purpose Subordinators in Late Modern English. PhD dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
Säily, Tanja, Vartiainen, Tanja & Siirtola, Harri. 2017. Exploring part-of- speech frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 7], Tanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin & Anita Auer (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten. 2009. A Typology of Purpose Clauses [Typological Studies in Language 88]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Kristina. 2002. The Development of Popular Journalism in England from 1700 to the Present, Corpus Compilation and Selective Stylistic Analysis. PhD dissertation, Universität Rostock.
Schou, Karsten. 2007. The syntactic status of English punctuation. English Studies 88(2): 195–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Štajner, Sanja & Mitkov, Ruslan. 2012. Diachronic changes in text complexity in 20th century English language: An NLP approach. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet U. Dogan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds), 1577–1584.Google Scholar
Westin, Ingrid. 2002. Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials. Amsterdam: Rodopi.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Krielke, Marie-Pauline
2024. Cross-linguistic Dependency Length Minimization in scientific language. Languages in Contrast 24:1  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Pilgrim, Charlie, Weisi Guo & Thomas T. Hills
2024. The rising entropy of English in the attention economy. Communications Psychology 2:1 DOI logo
Zhang, Ran, Jihed Ouni & Steffen Eger
2024. Cross-lingual Cross-temporal Summarization: Dataset, Models, Evaluation. Computational Linguistics 50:3  pp. 1001 ff. DOI logo
ABDURRAHMAN, Israa Burhanuddin, Aya Qasim HASAN & Ali Hussein HAZEM
2023. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Feminism in Drama: Susan Glaspell and Alice Childress as a Case Study. Asian Journal of Human Services 25:0  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Mücke, Justin, Daria Waldow, Luise Metzger, Philipp Schauz, Marcel Hoffman, Nicolas Lell & Ansgar Scherp
2023. Fine-Tuning Language Models for Scientific Writing Support. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14065],  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Gerold & Maud Reveilhac
2023. Colloquialisation, compression and democratisation in British parliamentary debates. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111],  pp. 336 ff. DOI logo
Alemany-Puig, Lluís & Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho
2022. Linear-Time Calculation of the Expected Sum of Edge Lengths in Random Projective Linearizations of Trees. Computational Linguistics 48:3  pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Haoran, Xueying Liu & Nana Pang
2022. Investigating diachronic change in dependency distance of Modern English: A genre-specific perspective. Lingua 272  pp. 103307 ff. DOI logo
Kranich, Svenja & Tine Breban
2021. Lost in Change. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rudnicka, Karolina
2021. In order that– a data-driven study of symptoms and causes of obsolescence. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1 DOI logo
Rudnicka, Karolina
Rudnicka, Karolina
2021. The “negative end” of change in grammar: terminology, concepts and causes. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1 DOI logo
Tsizhmovska, Natalia L. & Leonid M. Martyushev
2021. Principle of Least Effort and Sentence Length in Public Speaking. Entropy 23:8  pp. 1023 ff. DOI logo
Lorenz, David
2020. Converging variations and the emergence of horizontal links. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Lost in Change. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.