Language change is a natural evolutionary process, and as a result it is reasonable to expect that all registers will undergo historical change to some extent. While some registers adopt linguistic innovations readily, others resist such changes and exhibit more conservative patterns of change. This chapter considers the extent to which law reports have adopted linguistic innovations observed in other written registers (fiction, newspapers, and science prose). The analysis considers features related to two competing factors influencing historical change in written texts: popularization (the adoption of colloquial features associated with the need to write texts for a large and general population of readers) and economy (increases in the use of phrasal complexity features to create informationally-dense texts for specialist readers). The analysis shows that compared to other written registers, law reports have been relatively conservative and resistant to historical change. These results are interpreted relative to the situational and communicative characteristics of law reports.
Bhatia, Vijay K.1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Biber, Douglas. 2003. Compressed noun phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs. economy. In New Media Language, Jean Aitchison & Diana Lewis (eds), 169–183. London: Routledge.
Biber, Douglas & Conrad Susan. 2009. Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, & Reppen, Randi. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65: 487–517.
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. (Reprinted in Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas (eds). 2001. pp.66–83).
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 2–20.
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2011. Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 223–250.
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2012. The competing demands of popularization vs. economy: Written language in the age of mass literacy. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds), 314–328. Oxford: OUP.
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2013. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104–134.
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas & Jones, James K.2008. Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 1286–1304. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas (eds). 2001. Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fanego, Teresa, Rodríguez-Puente, Paula, López-Couso, María José, Méndez-Naya, Belén, Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma, Blanco-García, Cristina & Tamaredo, Iván. 2017. The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41: 53–82.
Farrelly, Michael & Seoane, Elena. 2012. Democratisation. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 392–401. Oxford: OUP.
Gross, Alan G., Harmon, Joseph E. & Reidy, Michael. 2002. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: OUP.
Hinrichs, Lars, Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bohmann, Axel. 2015. Which-hunting and the standard English relative clause. Language 91(4): 806–836.
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP.
Mair, Christian. 1997. The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. In Corpus-Based Studies in English. Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17), Stockholm, May 15–19, 1996, Magnus Ljung (ed), 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2023. The Corpus of Contemporary English Legal Decisions, 1950–2021 (CoCELD): A new tool for analysing recent changes in English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 47:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Mattioli, Virginia
2022. La tendencia hacia la simplificación en el discurso especializado y no-especializado: ampliando el alcance de los estudios de traducción basados en corpus al análisis multidiscursivo. TRANS: Revista de Traductología 26:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Wood, Margaret
2022. A lexico-grammatical comparison of statutory law and popular written language. Research in Corpus Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 16 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.