Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction

Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten

Editors

Michael J. Leeser | Florida State University

Gregory D. Keating | San Diego State University

Wynne Wong | The Ohio State University

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027208446 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027260130 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00

This volume consists of a well-integrated collection of original research articles and theoretical/overview papers on second language (L2) input processing. The primary contributors are former students of Bill VanPatten from the past three decades, and the collection of articles is intended as a tribute to his career and contribution of bringing processing issues to the center stage of research in second language acquisition (SLA) and instructed SLA. The research and theorizing presented in this volume are the most recent in the field and represent innovations in approaches to L2 processing research, including the use of online methodologies (self-paced reading and eye tracking) in the experimental papers. In addition, the editors are recognized authors and researchers who have published on sentence processing, input processing, and processing instruction, and all three editors are either on editorial boards or are associate editors of major L2 journals.

[Studies in Bilingualism, 62] 2021. viii, 359 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.62

Table of Contents

Preface and acknowledgements | pp. vii–viii

Introduction

Chapter 1. Input processing in second language acquisition: The pioneering work of Bill VanPatten

Michael J. Leeser, Gregory D. Keating and Wynne Wong | pp. 3–24

Part I. Research on sentence processing

Chapter 2. The processing of case in intermediate L2 Spanish

Jill Jegerski | pp. 27–52

Chapter 3. The processing of subject shifts in L2 Spanish: An examination of L2 learners’ use of inflectional morphology and reliance on overt subject pronouns

Suzanne Johnston | pp. 53–124

Chapter 4. When more is better: Higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and working memory facilitate L2 morphosyntactic processing

Nuria Sagarra | pp. 125–150

Part II. Research and perspectives on VanPatten’s model of input processing

Chapter 5. VanPatten (1990)’s long and winding story and the nature of replication studies

Cristina Sanz and Timothy J. McCormick | pp. 153–182

Chapter 6. Contextual effects in processing OVS constructions in Spanish: A partial replication of VanPatten and Houston (1998) and Malovrh (2006)

Casilde A. Isabelli | pp. 183–200

Chapter 7. Multilevel input processing: Emerging developments and future challenges

Joe Barcroft | pp. 201–232

Part III. Research and perspectives on processing instruction

Chapter 8. Trials-to-criterion as a methodological option to measure language processing in processing instruction

Claudia Fernández | pp. 235–260

Chapter 9. PI and the French causative and passive constructions: Examining transfer-of-training effects using eye tracking

Wynne Wong, Kiwako Ito and Laurene Glimois | pp. 261–294

Chapter 10. Why does processing instruction work? The role of PI within a framework of language and second language development

Michael J. Leeser | pp. 295–324

Conclusion

Chapter 11. Online methods in research on input processing and processing instruction

Gregory D. Keating | pp. 327–356

Index | pp. 357–359

Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Glimois, Laurene

2023. Language background differences in processing instruction. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 7:1 ► pp. 68 ff.

Kostadinova, Viktorija, Marco Wiemann, Gea Dreschler, Tamara Bouso, Beáta Gyuris, Ai Zhong, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Wiebke Ahlers, Manuela Vida-Mannl, Kholoud A Al-Thubaiti, Shawnea Sum Pok Ting, Ida Parise, Alessia Cogo & Elisabeth Reber

2024. IEnglish Language. The Year's Work in English Studies 102:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects