Focus in Generative Grammar

Author
Michael Rochemont | University of British Columbia, Vancouver
PaperbackAvailable
ISBN 9789027227911 | EUR 68.00 | USD 102.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027286338 | EUR 68.00 | USD 102.00
 
Google Play logo
The topic of this book is the notion of ‘focus’ and its linguistic characterization. The main thesis is that focus has a uniform grammatical identification only as a syntactic element with – in English at least – a certain systematic phonological interpretation and – presumably universally – a range of semantic interpretations. In broad respects, the framework within this investigation is conducted is that of Chomsky & Lasnik (1977) and the subsequent Government and Binding framework. After considering defining the location of prominence in a focused phrase in terms of constituent structure, the author argues that an argument structure approach to the focus phrase/prominence relation is more promising. This is then exemplified in analyses of cleft focus and constructional focus.
Publishing status: Available | Original publisher:E. Story-Scientia
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 146 other publications

Amaechi, Mary & Doreen Georgi
2019. Quirks of subject (non-)extraction in Igbo. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Amaechi, Mary & Doreen Georgi
2021. On optional wh-/focus fronting in Igbo: A SYN-SEM-PHON interaction. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 39:3  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Andreeva, Bistra, William John Barry & Jacques Koreman
2017. Local and Global Cues in the Prosodic Realization of Broad and Narrow Focus in Bulgarian. Phonetica 73:3-4  pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
Aravind, Athulya, Martin Hackl & Ken Wexler
2018. Syntactic and Pragmatic Factors in Children’s Comprehension of Cleft Constructions. Language Acquisition 25:3  pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Assmann, Muriel, Daniel Büring, Izabela Jordanoska & Max Prüller
2023. Towards a theory of morphosyntactic focus marking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 41:4  pp. 1349 ff. DOI logo
Bader, Markus
2000. On Reanalyis: Evidence from German. In German Sentence Processing [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 24],  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Ball, Catherine N.
1994. Relative pronouns in it-clefts: The last seven centuries. Language Variation and Change 6:2  pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Ball, Catherine N.
1996. A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English. Language Variation and Change 8:2  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Bell, Melanie J. & Ingo Plag
2013. Informativity and analogy in English compound stress. Word Structure 6:2  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Bertrand, Nicolas & Richard Faure
2022. Wh‐InterrogativesIn Ancient Greek Disentangling Focus‐ AndWh‐Movement*. Studia Linguistica 76:3  pp. 735 ff. DOI logo
Biezma, María
2014. Multiple Focus Strategies in Pro‐Drop Languages: Evidence from Ellipsis in Spanish. Syntax 17:2  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Borise, Lena
2021. Focus projection need not be based on pitch accents: evidence from Georgian. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Breen, Mara, Evelina Fedorenko, Michael Wagner & Edward Gibson
2010. Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 25:7-9  pp. 1044 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Jason & Karsten Koch
2016. Focus and Change in Polynesian Languages*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:3  pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Büring, Daniel
2009. Towards a typology of focus realization. In Information Structure,  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Büring, Daniel
2019. Topless and Salient—Convertibles in the Theory of Focus. In The Semantics of Plurals, Focus, Degrees, and Times,  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Carlson, Katy, Michael Walsh Dickey, Lyn Frazier & Charles Clifton
2009. Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62:1  pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Cat, Cécile De
2005. French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua 115:9  pp. 1195 ff. DOI logo
Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang
2014. Wh-fronting and the left periphery in Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 23:4  pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Cheung, Lawrence Yam-Leung
2009. Dislocation focus construction in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18:3  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Cohan, Jocelyn
2001. Consider the Alternatives: Focus in Contrast and Context. In Modeling and Using Context [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2116],  pp. 102 ff. DOI logo
Cruz, Adriana & Óscar Loureda
2019. Chapter 7. Processing patterns of focusing in Spanish. In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305],  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
CULICOVER, PETER W. & SUSANNE WINKLER
2008. English focus inversion. Journal of Linguistics 44:3  pp. 625 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
2023. Prosodic Patterns in the Four Existential Constructions with Relative Clause. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts,  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Delin, Judy
1995. Presupposition and shared knowledge in it-clefts. Language and Cognitive Processes 10:2  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Dikken, Marcel Den
2006. Either-Float and the Syntax of Co-or-dination. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24:3  pp. 689 ff. DOI logo
Donaldson, Bryan
2011. Nativelike right-dislocation in near-native French. Second Language Research 27:3  pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Donaldson, Bryan
2012. Syntax and Discourse in Near‐Native French: Clefts and Focus. Language Learning 62:3  pp. 902 ff. DOI logo
Endo, Yoshido & Liliane Haegeman
2019. Adverbial clauses and adverbial concord. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
1991. M. S. Rochemont & P. W. Culicover, English focus constructions and the theory of grammar. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 52.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. vii + 210.. Journal of Linguistics 27:2  pp. 525 ff. DOI logo
Fanselow, Gisbert & Denisa Lenertová
2011. Left peripheral focus: mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29:1  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Faure, Richard & Katerina Palasis
2021. Exclusivity! Wh-fronting is not optional wh-movement in Colloquial French. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Shengli
1996. Prosodically constrained syntactic changes in Early Archaic Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5:4  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Shengli
2003. Prosodically constrained postverbal PPs in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 41:6 DOI logo
Feng, Shengli
2015. On Nuclear Stress Rule in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ferreira, Fernanda
2007. Prosody and performance in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 22:8  pp. 1151 ff. DOI logo
Forcadell, Montserrat & Jaume Llopis
2014. Structural change in Catalan discourse. Studies in Language 38:2  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Fujimori, Atsushi, Noriko Yamane, Noriko Yoshimura, Mineharu Nakayama, Brian Teaman & Kiyoko Yoneyama
2022. Development of L2 prosody. In Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 67],  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Féry, Caroline
2013. Focus as prosodic alignment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31:3  pp. 683 ff. DOI logo
Féry, Caroline
2020. Grammatical Reflexes of Information Structure in Germanic Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics,  pp. 661 ff. DOI logo
Geurts, Bart & Rob van der Sandt
2004. Interpreting focus. Theoretical Linguistics 30:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Glatz, Daniel & Ralf Klabunde
2003. Focus as perspectivation. Linguistics 41:5 DOI logo
GONZÁLEZ, CAROLINA & LARA REGLERO
2024. Intonation correlates of canonical and non-canonical wh-in-situ questions in Spanish. Journal of Linguistics 60:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Gotzner, Nicole
2017. Theoretical and Empirical Background. In Alternative Sets in Language Processing,  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Gotzner, Nicole
2019. The role of focus intonation in implicature computation: a comparison with only and also. Natural Language Semantics 27:3  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Greif, Markus & Stavros Skopeteas
2021. Correction by Focus: Cleft Constructions and the Cross-Linguistic Variation in Phonological Form. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Guinjoan, Montserrat Forcadell
2014. The translation into Catalan of marked structures inKing Lear. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 130:4  pp. 956 ff. DOI logo
Gupton, Timothy & Elizabeth Gielau
2021. Introduction. In East and West of The Pentacrest [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 33],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gussenhoven, Carlos
1991. The English Rhythm Rule as an accent deletion rule. Phonology 8:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Harris, Alice C.
Hartmann, Jutta M.
2013. Freezing in it-clefts. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 58:3  pp. 487 ff. DOI logo
Heggie, Lorie
1993. The range of null operators: Evidence from clefting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11:1  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Herbeck, Peter
2018. Deriving Null, Strong and Emphatic Pronouns in Romance Pro-Drop Languages. In Pronouns in Embedded Contexts at the Syntax-Semantics Interface [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 99],  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Hetland, Jorunn
1994. Verbprojektionen im Vorfeld — Ansatz zu einem deutsch-norwegischen Vergleich. In Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation?,  pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Hoof, Hanneke van
2003. The rise in the risefall contour: does it evoke a contrastive topic or a contrastive focus?. Linguistics 41:3 DOI logo
Hoot, Bradley
2017. Narrow presentational focus in heritage Spanish and the syntax‒discourse interface. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Hoskins, S.
1996. Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96,  pp. 1632 ff. DOI logo
Hróarsdóttir, þorbjörg
2009. Information structure and OV order. In Information Structure,  pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Yu-Yin & Claudia Felser
2019. Associations between focus constructions and levels of exhaustivity: An experimental investigation of Chinese. PLOS ONE 14:10  pp. e0223502 ff. DOI logo
INOUE, KAZUKO
2004. Conceptual and Methodological Bases of the Minimalist Program (N. Chomsky, On Nature and Language). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 21:2  pp. 514 ff. DOI logo
Ip, Martin Ho Kwan & Anne Cutler
2022. In Search of Salience: Focus Detection in the Speech of Different Talkers. Language and Speech 65:3  pp. 650 ff. DOI logo
Ishihara, Shinichiro
2017. The Intonation of Wh- and Yes/No-Questions in Tokyo Japanese. In Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 91],  pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
İşsever, Selçuk
2019. On the Ban on Postverbal wh Phrases in Turkish: A Syntactic Account. In Word Order in Turkish [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 97],  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
JOHANSSON, MATS
2001. Clefts in contrast: a contrastive study of it clefts and wh clefts in English and Swedish texts and translations. Linguistics 39:3 DOI logo
Jokweni, Mbulelo W.
1996. Deriving phonological phrases in Xhosa. South African Journal of Linguistics 14:2  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
2001. On Wh-questions in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 46:1-2  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Kaiser, Elsi
2011. Focusing on pronouns: Consequences of subjecthood, pronominalisation, and contrastive focus. Language and Cognitive Processes 26:10  pp. 1625 ff. DOI logo
Kaiser, Elsi
2016. Discourse level processing. In Visually Situated Language Comprehension [Advances in Consciousness Research, 93],  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Kaiser, Elsi & Catherine Wang
2021. Packaging Information as Fact Versus Opinion: Consequences of the (Information-)Structural Position of Subjective Adjectives. Discourse Processes 58:7  pp. 617 ff. DOI logo
Katzir, Roni
2024. On the roles of anaphoricity and questions in free focus. Natural Language Semantics 32:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Kennedy, Becky
2005. Interpretive effects in multiple interrogation. Journal of Pragmatics 37:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Dong Jin, Okgi Kim & Hanyong Park
2023. Prosodic realization of identification and contrastive focus in Korean multiple accusative constructions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1 DOI logo
Kim, Min-Joo
2022. That’s a Curious Copular Construction You Have There!. Linguistic Inquiry 53:1  pp. 168 ff. DOI logo
KOBAYASHI, KEIICHIRO
1997. A MINIMALIST APPROACH TO PSEUDOCLEFTS IN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 14:0  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Karsten A.
2011. A Phonetic Study of Intonation and Focus in Nłeʔkepmxcin (Thompson River Salish). In Prosodic Categories: Production, Perception and Comprehension [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, ],  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Karsten A.
2013. Focus on head-final relatives. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 58:2  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Kratzer, Angelika
2004. Interpreting focus: Presupposed or expressive meanings? A comment on Geurts and van der Sandt. Theoretical Linguistics 30:1 DOI logo
Kratzer, Angelika & Elisabeth Selkirk
2020. Deconstructing information structure. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Kügler, Frank & Caroline Féry
2017. Postfocal Downstep in German. Language and Speech 60:2  pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Jackie Yan-Ki
2019. Parallel copying in dislocation copying: evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28:3  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Lambova, Mariana
2001. On A-bar movements in Bulgarian and their interaction. The Linguistic Review 18:4 DOI logo
Leal, Tania, Emilie Destruel & Bradley Hoot
2019. The acquisition of Focus in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research 35:4  pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Tommy Tsz-Ming
2023. Last but not least: a comparative perspective on right dislocation in Alasha Mongolian. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 32:4  pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Liakin, Denis
2007. Les questions multiples : le débat continue. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 52:3  pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Jo-Wang
1992. The syntax of zenmeyang ?how? and weishenme ?why? in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1:3  pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Lobo, Maria, Ana Lúcia Santos, Carla Soares-Jesel & Stéphanie Vaz
2019. Effects of syntactic structure on the comprehension of clefts. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
LóPEZ, LUIS & SUSANNE WINKLER
2000. Focus and topic in VP-anaphora constructions. Linguistics 38:4 DOI logo
MARUTA, TADAO
1992. English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar, by Michael S. Rochemont and Peter W. Culicover, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, vii+210 pp. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 9:0  pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
NIKOLAEVA, IRINA
2001. Secondary topic as a relation in information structure. Linguistics 39:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Noonan, Máire B.
1997. Functional Architecture and Wh-Movement: Irish as a Case in Point. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 42:1-2  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Oda, Hiromune
2024. Large-scale pied-piping in the labeling theory and conditions on weak heads. The Linguistic Review 41:1  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Olarrea, Antxon
2012. Word Order and Information Structure. In The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics,  pp. 603 ff. DOI logo
Otero, Carlos P.
1996. Head Movement, Cliticization, Precompilation, and Word Insertion (Comments on Uriagereka’s Paper). In Current Issues in Comparative Grammar [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35],  pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
Po-lun, Peppina Lee & Haihua Pan
2001. The Chinese negation marker bu and its association with focus. Linguistics 39:4 DOI logo
Puerma Bonilla, Javier
2018. La función informativa del sujeto en construcciones transitivas en la historia del español . Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española :13  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Reeve, Matthew & Glyn Hicks
2017. Adjunct Extraposition: Base Generation or Movement?. Syntax 20:3  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Reis, Marga & Inger Rosengren
1992. What do Wh-imperatives tell us about Wh-movement?. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Rochemont, Michael
Rochemont, Michael S.
1986.  Paul Werth. Focus, Coherence, and Emphasis. London: Croom Helm. 1984. Pp. 293.. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 31:2  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Rooth, Mats
1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1:1  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Rooth, Mats
2009. Second occurrence focus andRelativized Stress F. In Information Structure,  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2005. Prosody–Syntax Interaction in the Expression of Focus. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23:3  pp. 687 ff. DOI logo
Sawada, Osamu
2023. Scalarity of the Japanese initial mora-based minimizer: a compositional (lexically unspecified) minimizer and a non-compositional (lexically specified) minimizer. Natural Language Semantics 31:2-3  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Schoenmakers, Gert-Jan
2020. Freedom in the Dutch middle-field: Deriving discourse structure at the syntax-pragmatics interface. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Sgall, Petr
1996. Functional sentence perspective. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
SHIMA, ETSURO
2008. Two Types of Elliptical Constructions (S. Winkler, Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 25:1  pp. 292 ff. DOI logo
Skopeteas, Stavros & Gisbert Fanselow
2009. Effects of givenness and constraints on free word order. In Information Structure,  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Slioussar, Natalia
2014. What is and what is not problematic about the T-model. In Minimalism and Beyond [Language Faculty and Beyond, 11],  pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Carlota S.
2003. Modes of Discourse, DOI logo
Smyth, Ronald H.
1988. Contextual Motivation and Working Memory. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 33:3  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Soares, Eduardo Correa
2016. Yes-No Answers, Partial Pro-drop Languages and Machine Translation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 231  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Stevens, Jon S. & Gareth Roberts
2019. Noise, Economy, and the Emergence of Information Structure in a Laboratory Language. Cognitive Science 43:2 DOI logo
Szendröi, Kriszta
2006. Focus Movement (With Special Reference to Hungarian). In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax,  pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Szendrői, Kriszta
2017. Focus Movement. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sæbø, Kjell Johan
2006. Focus interpretation in Thetic statements: Alternative Semantics and Optimality Theory Pragmatics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16:1  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
TAKAMI, KEN-ICHI
1987. ADJUNCTS AND THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF VP. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 4:0  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Tomioka, Satoshi
2009. Contrastive topics operate on speech acts. In Information Structure,  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Tonhauser, Judith
2015. Are ‘informative presuppositions’ presuppositions?. Language and Linguistics Compass 9:2  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Tuller, Laurice
1992. The syntax of postverbal focus constructions in Chadic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10:2  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Veselovská, Ludmila
2021. Wh-Questions, DOI logo
Wagner, Michael
2020. Prosodic Focus. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Watson, Duane G., Cassandra L. Jacobs & Andrés Buxó‐Lugo
2020. Prosody indexes both competence and performance. WIREs Cognitive Science 11:3 DOI logo
Winkler, Susanne & Edward Göbbel
2002. Focus, p-movement, and the nuclear-stress rule: a view from Germanic and Romance. Linguistics 40:6 DOI logo
Yip, Ka-Fai & Tommy Tsz-Ming Lee
2022. Modal movement licensed by focus. In New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 272],  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Huili, Haifeng Duan & Haihua Pan
2022. 焦點–重音原則與漢語的「把」字句. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學  pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
ZHOU, PENG & STEPHEN CRAIN
2010. Focus identification in child Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 37:5  pp. 965 ff. DOI logo
Zimmermann, Malte
2008. Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55:3-4  pp. 347 ff. DOI logo
Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry
2009. Introduction. In Information Structure,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry
2009. Information Structure, DOI logo
Zobl, Helmut
1989. Modularity in Adult L2 Acquisition. Language Learning 39:1  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Zubizarreta, María Luisa & Jean‐Roger Vergnaud
2006. Phrasal Stress and Syntax. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax,  pp. 522 ff. DOI logo
Zubizarreta, María Luisa & Jean‐Roger Vergnaud
2017. Phrasal Stress and Syntax. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Özsoy, A. Sumru
2019. Derivation of Fronting in Turkish. In Word Order in Turkish [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 97],  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Živković, Ema & Nina Sudimac
2021. The effect of focus and the focus particle samo on the exclusion of contextual alternatives in Serbian. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:2  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2003. References. In Word Order and Scrambling,  pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2006. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 742 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2006. Consolidated References. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax,  pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2009. Abbreviations and symbols. In Information Structure,  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2009. Copyright Page. In Information Structure,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory,  pp. 779 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CF: Linguistics

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  86003568 | Marc record