Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 19:1 (1995) ► pp.244248
References (12)
References
Daalder, Saskia; and Verhagen, Arie. 1993. “Dutch tenses and the analysis of a literary text: The case of Marga Minco’s De val ”. In: Kirsner (ed), 139–150.Google Scholar
Geerts, G.; Haeseryn, W.; Rooij, J. de; and Toorn, M. C. van den (eds). 1984. Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff and Leuven: Wolters.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, J.; and Janssen, Th. (eds). 1991. The function of tense in texts. [Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Verhandelingen, Afd. Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, deel 1441] Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Haan, S. de. 1991. “Meaning and use of the Dutch perfect”. In: Gvozdanović; and Janssen (eds), 143–156.Google Scholar
Janssen, Theo A. J. M. 1989. “Preteritum of perfectum? O tempora, o sores!Neerlandica Extra Muros 531: 50–60.Google Scholar
Janssen, Th. A. J. M. 1991. “Preterite as definite description”. In: Gvozdanović; and Janssen (eds), 157–181.Google Scholar
Kirsner, Robert S. (ed). 1993. The Low Countries and beyond. [Publications of the American Association for Netherlandic Studies 51]. Lanham, New York, and London: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume II1. Descriptive application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, Yishai. 1990. Semiotics and linguistics. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Yuyst, J. de. 1983. A semantic analysis of temporal elements in Dutch and English. University of Groningen Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar