Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 45:2 (2021) ► pp.408–427

Tonal morphology in Sama Nubri

Case marking and transitivity alternations

ORCID logo | The University of Hong Kong
This paper reports on the Tibeto-Burman language, Nubri, of the high Himalayan region of northern central Nepal. Specifically, data is presented to illustrate the use of tone to mark two morphological features in the language: the use of a H tone suffix to mark the genitive case, and the use of a H tone prefix to mark an increase in transitivity. This is the first account of these phenomena in Nubri and an analysis is presented before contextualizing the phenomena in a typological perspective.
Keywords: case marking, causatives, transitivity, grammatical tone, tonal morphology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Tone in Nubri
  • 3.Tonal case in Nubri
  • 4.Tonally marked transitivity alternations in Nubri
  • 5.Typological distribution of grammatical tone
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19074.don
References (35)
References
Beam de Azcona, Rosemary. 2004. A Coatlan-Loxicha Zapotec grammar (Mexico). Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2013. Fusion of selected inflectional formatives. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL] (last access: 25 August 2020).
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1930. ə sistim əv ‘toun-letəz’ [A system of ‘tone-letters’]. Le Maître Phonétique 301. 24–27.Google Scholar
Dhakal, Dubi Nanda. 2017. Causative constructions in Lhomi, Gyalsumdo, Nubri, and Lowa. Gipan 3(1). 65–82.Google Scholar
Dhakal, Dubi Nanda & Mark Donohue. 2015. Inchoative/causative verb pairs in Tsum. Nepalese Linguistics 301. 45–49.Google Scholar
Diller, Anthony, Jerry Edmondson & Youngxian Luo. 2008. The Tai-Kadai languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Donohue, Cathryn. 2012. The role of contour and phonation in Fuzhou tonal identification. In Cathryn Donohue, Shunichi Ishihara and William Steed (eds), Quantitative approaches to problems in linguistics, 63–75. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
. 2013. Fuzhou tonal acoustics and phonology. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2018. Case marking in Nubri. Nepalese Linguistics 331. 28–33.Google Scholar
. 2019. A preliminary sociolinguistic survey of Nubri Valley. Nepalese Linguistics 341. 10–17.Google Scholar
Donohue, Cathryn & Mark Donohue. 2019. The complexity of tone in Nubri. Nepalese Linguistics 341. 18–25.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark, Rebecca Hetherington, James McElvenny & Virginia Dawson. 2013. World phonotactics database. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL] (last access 25 August 2020).
Handel, Zev. 2012. Valence-changing prefixes and voicing alternation in Old Chinese and Proto-Sino-Tibetan: Reconstructing *s- and *N-prefixes. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 61–82.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey & Laura McPherson. 2013. Tonosyntax and reference restriction in Dogon NPs. Language 891. 265–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan. 2007. Aspirate and non-aspirate voiceless consonants in Old Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 81. 471–93.Google Scholar
. 2014. A note on voicing in the Tibetan verbal system. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1). 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Idiatov, Dmitry. 2015. Explaining the intransitive L tone in Greater Manding: A form with (out) a function. Paper presented at the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, Italy, 27–31 July 2015.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2012. An internal reconstruction of Tibetan stem alternations. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(2). 212–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The origin of the causative prefix in rGyalrong languages and its implication for proto-Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Folia Linguistica Historica 36(1). 165–198.Google Scholar
Luo, Yongxian. 2014. Sino-Tai and Tai-Kadai: Another look. In Anthony V. N. Diller, Jerold A. Edmondson & Yongxian Luo (eds), The Tai-Kadai languages, 9–28. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James. 1973. A grammar of Lahu. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, Laura. 2014. Replacive grammatical tone in the Dogon languages. Los Angeles: UCLA PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2017. Tone features revisited: Evidence from Seenku. In Doris L. Payne, Sara Pacchiarotti & Mokaya Bosire (eds.), Diversity in African languages, 5–22. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, Laura, and Jeffrey Heath. 2016. Phrasal grammatical tone in the Dogon languages: the role of constraint interaction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 341. 593–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mei, Tsu-Lin. 2012. The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 131. 1–28.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 2005. Introducing phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L., Jonathan D. Amith & Rey Castillo García. 2016. Verbal inflection in Yoloxóchitl Mixtec. In Enrique L. Palancar & Jean Léo Léonard (eds.), Tone and inflection: New facts and new perspectives, 295–336. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2010. Hmong-Mien language history. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 1995. Chinese “buy” and “sell” and the direction of borrowings between Chinese and Hmong-Mien: A response to Haudricourt and Strecker. T’oung Pao 91(4). 328–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurgood, Graham & Randy J. LaPolla. 2003. The Sino-Tibetan languages. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Uray, Géza. 1953. Some problems of the ancient Tibetan verbal morphology: Methodological observations on recent studies. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31. 37–62.Google Scholar
VanBik, Kenneth. 2002. Three types of causative constructions in Hakha Lai. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 25(2). 99–122.Google Scholar
Vesalainen, Olavi & Merja Vesalainen. 1980. Clause patterns in Lhomi (Pacific Linguistics Series 53). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Vesalainen, Olavi. 2016. A grammar sketch of Lhomi (Language and Culture Documentation and Description 34). SIL International ePress.Google Scholar