References (73)
References
Altmann, Hans. 1998. Lokal- und Direktionaladverbien in einem mittelbairischen Dialekt. [Local and directional adverbials in a central Bavarian dialect]. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik LXV(3). 257–279.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1977. Zur Semantik direktionaler Postpositionen. [Towards a semantic analysis of directional prepositions]. Papiere zur Linguistik 17/181. 102–122.Google Scholar
Berg, Thomas. 2020. Asymmetrical intercalation in Germanic complex verbs. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 32(2). 107–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe. 1997. On goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientation parameters. In Bohumil Palek, Osama Fujimiúra & Jiři Václav Neustupný (eds.), Proceedings of LP’96. Typology, Item Orderings and Universals, 185–218. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1957. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-verb words in Early Modern English: A corpus-based approach. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleasby, Richard & Gudbrand Vigfusson. 1874. An Icelandic-English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1982. Some Remarks on Japanese Deictics. In Jürgen Weissenborn & Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Here and there: Cross-linguistic studies on deixis and demonstration, 209–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Encoding the distinction between location, source and destination: a typological study. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives. Form, functions and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives. Studies in Language 27(1). 635–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4). 463–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2003. Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27(1). 61–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce. 1993. A grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Einarsson, Stefán. 1945; 2001. Icelandic grammar, texts, glossary. Baltimore, London: John Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Fagard, Benjamin & Anetta Kopecka. 2021. Source/Goal (a)symmetry: A comparative study of German and Polish. Studies in Language 45(1). 130–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1972. How do you know whether you are coming or going. In Karl Hyldgard-Jensen (ed.), Linguistik 1971, 369–379. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita. 2015. The grammar and pragmatics of N hin, N her (‘N thither’, ‘N hither’) in German. Pragmatics and Society 61. 89–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fries, Norbert. 1991. Prepositions and prepositional phrases: a contrastive analysis. In Gisa Rauh (ed.). Approaches to prepositions, 53–75. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis. 2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry: Synchronic and diachronic evidence from Ancient Greek. Constructions and Frames 10(1). 61–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerritsen, Johan. & N. E. Osselton. 1978. Wolters‘ Woordenboeken . Nederlands-Engels. Groningen/Leiden.Google Scholar
Girnth, Heiko & Sascha Michel. 2008. Hin vs. her — hier vs. dort/da. The neutralization of the speaker’s perspective. A case of semantic (inter-)subjectivization in German dialects. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica. 161. 48–81.Google Scholar
Goschler, Juliana & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2013. Beyond typology: The encoding of motion events across time and varieties. In Juliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guérin, Valérie. 2015. Demonstrative verbs: A typology of verbal manner deixis. Linguistic Typology 19(2).141–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Defining and diagnosing linguistic categories: A case study of clitic phenomena. In Johanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krysztof Migdalski. (eds.), How categorical are categories? 273–304. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics 57(3). 605–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Is cliticization an intermediate stage between free lexeme and affix status. Paper presented at a conference, the University of Potsdam. Available at: [URL] (last access 20 August 2024).
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1987. Source vs. goal: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concepts of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki. 2012. The expression of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’ verbs in Japanese: The asymmetry of Source and Goal revisited. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Put and Take events: A cross-linguistic perspective, 253–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese (revised edition). Amsterdam: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Neil G. 2005. Yiddish — A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jawzal, Nechirvan Hassan & Razgar Yousif Omar. 2020. English directiona adverbs: An empirical study. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences 24(3): 315–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Elsi. 2013. Demonstrative adjectives in spoken Finnish: Informational sufficiency and the speaker-addressee dynamic. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 124–139.Google Scholar
Karatsareas, Petros & Thanasis Georgakopoulos. 2016. From syntagmatic to paradigmatic zeros: the loss of the preposition se in inner Asia Minor Greek. STUF — Language Typology and Universals 69(2). 309–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2008. Animacy effects on differential goal marking. Linguistic Typology 12(2). 245–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The (proto)typicality of direction: the (allative and illative) case(s) of Finnish. In Sivia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Perspectives on semantic roles, 151–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köbler, Gerhard. 2006. Neuenglisch-althochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Available online at [URL] (last access 20 August 2024).
. 2014. Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch, online. Available online at [URL] (last access 20 August 2024).
Koenig, Ekkehard & Yoko Nishina. 2015. Deixis der Art und Weise, der Qualität und des Grades im Deutschen und Japanischen: eine kontrastiv vergleichende Analyse [Deictics of manner, of quality and of degree in German and Japanese: a contrastive analysis.]. Linguistische Berichte [Sonderheft) 201. 7–32.Google Scholar
Koenig, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi. 2022. On the development of OE swa to ModE so and related changes in an atypical group of demonstratives. In Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), English historical linguistics: Change in structure and meaning, 309–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2024. The development and loss of directional deixis in the history of English. To appear in Medioeva europeo 8(1): 23-53.Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet. (eds.), 2021. Source-Goal (A)symmetries across Languages. Special Issue of Studies in Language 451.Google Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau. 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96(1). 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between source and goal paths. Cognitive Science 36(3). 517–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Stephen. 2007. Spatial references in Icelandic: The issue of identity. Proceedings from LingO 2. The Oxford Postgraduate Linguistics Conference, 157–164.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2018. Introduction. Demonstratives: Patterns in diversity. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael J. Dunn, Nick. J. Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–42. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lidén, Mitsuyo Kuwano. 2016. Deictic demonstratives in Japanese, Finnish and Swedish: First and third language perspectives. Stockholm: University of Stockholm Ph.D. dissertation.
Los, Bettelou, Corrien Blom, Geert Booij, Marion Elenbaas & Ans van Kemenade. 2012. Morpho-syntactic change: A comparative study of particles and prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.). 2017. Space in diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, Seungho. 2004. Goal and source. Their syntactic and semantic asymmetry. Berkeley Linguistic Society 30: General Session and Parasession on Conceptual Structure and Cognition in Grammatical Theory, 304–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2009. Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the source/goal ambiguity. Linguistics 57(5). 1113–1141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nintemann, Julia, Maja Robbers & Nicole Hober. 2020. Here, hither, hence and related categories: A cross-linguistic study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Herrmann. 1916–20. Deutsche Grammatik. Halle.Google Scholar
Perkins, Revere. 1992. Deixis, grammar and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regier, Thierry & Mingyu Zheng. 2007. Attention to endpoints. A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 311. 705–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossdeutscher, Antje. 2009. German her, hin, hin und her und herum: Meaning and justification of direction and change of direction in perceptual space. In Arndt Riester & Togrim Solstad. (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 131. 439–454. Stuttgart: Online Publikationsverbund Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rowley, Anthony. 1980. Richtungs- und Ortsangabe in der Mundart von Florutz (Fierozzo) im italienischen Tirol. [Directional and local expressions in the dialect of Florutz in Tirol.] In Anthony Rowley (ed.), Sprachliche Orientierung l. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Semantik der Richtungsadverbien in oberdeutschen Mundarten. Bayreuth: Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (Jahrbuch der Johann-Andreas-Schmeller-Gesellschaft), 73–96.Google Scholar
Rzepecki, Robert. 2008. Verben mit her- und hin- besser verstehen. Übungen zu den mit her- hin- und hinter- präfigierten Verben. [For a better understanding of verbs with her- and hin-. Exercises with verbs prefixed by hin- and her-.] Norderstedt: Grin.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Adha Rohde. 2004. The goal basis in the encoding of motion events. In Günther Radden & Claus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation, 249–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2018. The goal bias revised. A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6(1). 134–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas; Nataliya Levkovych & Aina Urdze. 2017a. Spatial interrogatives: Typology and dynamics (with special focus on the development from Latin to Romance). In Sylvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in Diachrony, 207–240. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas; Nataliya Levkovych; Aina Urdze; Julia Nintemann & Maja Robbers. 2017b. Spatial interrogatives in Europe and beyond. Where, whither, whence. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2006. Icelandic particles in -an . CASTL, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskudur. 1994. Icelandic. In Ekkehard Koenig & Johan van der Auwera (eds.) The Germanic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annemarie. 2017. The goal over source principle in European languages. In Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 1–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1906. An Old High German primer. Oxford Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. 1983. On the compositionality of German prefix verbs. In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.). Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 452–465. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2001. Lexical particles, semilexical postpositions. In Norber Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Semi-lexical categories, 505–549. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar