Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 24:2 (2000) ► pp.462469
Bybee, Joan L.
1995 “Regular morphology and the lexicon”. Language and Cognitive Processes 101. 425–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 “The emergent lexicon”. Chicago Linguistic Society 341.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan; William Pagliuca; and Revere Perkins
1994The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1983The semantics of modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Green, John N.
1987 “The evolution of Romance auxiliaries: criteria and chronology”. In Harris, Martin and Paolo Ramat (eds), Historical development of auxiliaries, 257–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993Auxiliaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1987 “Emergent grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society 131. 139–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quesada, J. Diego
1995 “ Estar + -ndo y el aspecto progresivo en español”. Iberoromania 421. 8–29.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario
1998Verbal periphrases in Romance: aspect, actionality, and grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar