Review published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 25:2 (2001) ► pp.347–353
Book review
. The Function of Discourse Particles. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series, 53]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. xi + 417 pp.
Reviewed by
References (16)
Abraham, W. (ed.). 1991. Discourse particles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 
Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brinton, L. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Discourse Processes 24:1. 1997. Special issue on Discourse Markers from a cognitive point of view. W. Spooren & R. Risselada (eds.).
Journal of Pragmatics 30:2. 1998. Special issue on Discourse Markers and coherence relations. R. Risselada & W. Spooren (eds.).
Jucker, A. & Y. Ziv (eds.). 1998. Discourse markers. Descriptions and theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Foolen, A. 1996. “Pragmatic particles.” In: J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. 24 pp. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fraser, B. 1996. “Pragmatic markers.” Pragmatics 61, 167–190.
1999. “What are discourse markers?” Journal of Pragmatics 311, 931–952.
Hansen, M. Mosegaard. 1996. “Some common discourse particles in spoken French.” In: M. Mosegaard Hansen & G. Skytte (eds.), Le discours: Cohérence et Connexion. Actes du colloque international, Copenhague le 7 avril 1995, 105–149. (= Etudes Romanes, 351). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
. 1998a. “The semantic status of discourse markers.” Lingua 1041: 235–260.
Harder, P. 1996. Functional semantics. A theory of meaning, structure and tense in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kroon, C. 1995. Discourse particles in Latin. A study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: Gieben.
Lichtenberk, F. 1991. “Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization.” Language 671: 475–509.
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schourup, L. 1999. “Discourse markers.” Lingua 1071, 227–265.