Cover not available
Review article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 27:2 (2003) ► pp.361–395
Review article

Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.). Circum-Baltic Languages. Volume 1: Past and Present and Volume 2: Grammar and Typology. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2001. xx + 761 + 21 pp. three indexes. ISBN 90-272-3057-9 / 90-272-3059-5

Reviewer
Published online: 31 October 2003
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.2.07wie
References (18)
References
Bybee, J., Dahl, Ö. (1989): The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13–1, 2, 51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö., Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (1992): Language typology around the Baltic sea: a problem inventory. Stockholm: Papers from the Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm 61.Google Scholar
Heine, B. (1997): Possession: Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. & Claudi, U., Hünnemeyer, F. (1991): Grammaticalization (A Conceptual Framework). Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holvoet, A. (1995): On the evolution of the passive in Lithuanian and Latvian. In: Smoczyński, W. (ed.): Analecta Indoeuropaea Cracoviensia (I. Safarewicz memoriae dedicata). Kraków: Universitas, 173–182.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980): Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maryniakowa, I. (1976): Imiesłowy w rosyjskiej gwarze starowierców mieszkających w Polsce. Wrocław etc.: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Moser, M. (1998): Die polnische, ukrainische und weißrussische Interferenzschicht im russischen Satzbau des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt/M. etc.: Lang.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (1992): Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roszko, R. (1993): Wykładniki modalności imperceptywnej w języku polskim i litewskim. Warszawa: SOW.Google Scholar
Stang, Chr. S. (1939): Die altrussische Urkundensprache der Stadt Polozk. Oslo.Google Scholar
Stolz, Th. (1991): Sprachbund im Baltikum? Estnisch und Lettisch im Zentrum einer sprachlichen Konvergenzlandschaft. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G., Kaufman, Th. (1988): Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley etc.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trubinskij, V. I. (1984): Očerki russkogo dialektnogo sintaksisa. Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU.Google Scholar
Uspenskij, B. A. (1987): Istorija russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (XI–XVII vv.). München. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. J. (1993): A theory of aspectuality. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge U. P.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, B. (2001): Infinite predication as a marker of evidentiality and modality in the languages of the Baltic region. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54 3, 186–210.Google Scholar
Willett, Th. (1988): A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12 1, 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar