Cover not available
Part of
Cross-linguistic Correspondences: From lexis to genre
Edited by Thomas Egan and Hildegunn Dirdal
[Studies in Language Companion Series 191] 2017
► pp. 253–270

Chapter 10
Citations in research writing

The interplay of discipline, culture and expertise

 | Vilnius University
The paper investigates disciplinary, cultural and genre factors and their influence on citation in research writing. The study is based on literature and linguistics research articles written by Lithuanian and British researchers in their native languages as well as literature and linguistics BA papers written by Lithuanian students in English. The focus of the study is on frequency distribution, syntactic integration and types of citations. The results of the study of research articles confirm clear disciplinary variation in the way citations are employed in research writing. No obvious cultural differences were observed in the analysed expert texts, which points towards discipline as a decisive factor in citational trends in literature and linguistics. Citation trends in linguistic and literature BA papers were similar to a certain extent; however, students who wrote literature papers seem to cite more in the manner of professional writers and thus display more similarity with the conventional citational practices of their field.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methods
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Frequency distribution of citations
    • 3.2Syntactic integration of citations
    • 3.3Number of citations at one reference point
    • 3.4Types of citations
  • 4.Concluding observations
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.191.10sin
References (42)
References
Berkenkotter, Carol & Huckin, Thomas. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2009. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloveščiūnienė, Lina & Petrauskaitė, Rūta. 2013. From bibliographic to full text open access database on Lithuanian studies. ScieCom Info 9(2). <[URL]>
Bowker, Lynne & Pearson, Jennifer. 2002. Working with Specialized Language: A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cargill, Margaret & O’Connor, Patrick. 2009. Writing Scientific Research Articles: Strategy and Steps. Hoboken NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Connor, Ulla & Moreno, Ana I. 2005. Tertium comparationis: A vital component in contrastive rhetoric research. In Directions in Applied Linguistics, Paul Bruthiaux, Dwight Atkinson, William G. Eggington, William Grabe & Vaidehi Ramanathan (eds), 153–164. Clevedon: Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Trine. 2004. Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics 36(10): 1807–1825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Saz Rubio, M. Milagros. 2011. A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural Sciences. English for Specific Purposes 30(4): 258–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine & Kinn, Torodd. 2006. Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 148]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfield, Eugene. 1989. The English language: The lingua franca of international science. The Scientist 3(10): 12.Google Scholar
Giannoni, Davide Simone. 2002. Worlds of gratitude: A contrastive study of acknowledgment texts in English and Italian research articles. Applied Linguistics 23(1): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Granger, Sylviane & Paquot, Magali. 2007. Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 319–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harwood, Nigel. 2009. An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 41(3): 497–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirano, Eliana. 2009. Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes 28(4): 240–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Guangwei & Wang, Guihua. 2014. Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14:14–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1999. Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics 20(3): 341–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Dissertation acknowledgements: The anatomy of a Cinderella genre. Written Communication 20(3): 242–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004a. Graduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgments. English for Specific Purposes 23(3): 303–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. A convincing argument: Corpus analysis and academic persuasion. In Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 16], Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds), 87–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2008a. Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies 8(2): 1–23.Google Scholar
. 2008b. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Academic discourse. In The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, Ken Hyland & Brian Paltridge (eds), 171–184. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2005. Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 24(3): 269–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2002[1987]. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, Rosa, Mur Dueñas, Pilar & Lafuente-Millán, Enrique (eds). 2010. Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 1993. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Moreno, Ana I. 2008. The importance of comparable corpora in cross-cultural studies. In Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 169], Ulla Connor, Ed Nagelhout & William V. Rozycki (eds), 25–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mur Dueñas, Pilar. 2009. Citation in business management research articles: A contrastive (English–Spanish) corpus-based analysis. In Suomela-Salmi & Dervin (eds), 49–60.Google Scholar
. 2010. A contrastive analysis of research article introductions in English and Spanish. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 61: 119–133.Google Scholar
. 2011. An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43(12): 3068–3079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2010. The discourse functions of metadiscourse in published academic writing: Issues of culture and language. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2): 41–68.Google Scholar
Petrić, Bojana. 2007. Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(3): 238–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sala, Michele. 2008. Argumentative styles as cultural identity traits in legal studies. Linguistica e Filologia 27: 93–113.Google Scholar
Samraj, Betty. 2002. Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21(1): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2008. WordSmith Tools, version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Soler, Viviana. 2011. Comparative and contrastive observations on scientific titles written in English and Spanish. English for Specific Purposes 30(2): 124–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suomela-Salmi, Eija & Dervin, Fred. (eds). 2009. Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 193], Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M. 1981. Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: University of Aston.Google Scholar
1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul & Tribble, Christopher. 2001. Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning and Technology 5(3): 91–105.Google Scholar
Wang, Yan & Bai, Yongquan. 2007. A corpus-based syntactic study of medical research article titles. System 35(3): 388–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Jürine, Anni, Djuddah Leijen, Helen Hint, Jolanta Sinkuniene, Diāna Laiveniece, Christer Johansson & Nicholas Groom
2021. Academic Writing in the Baltic States. Educare :1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2018. Chapter 1. A contrastive (English, Czech English, Czech) study of rhetorical functions of citations in Linguistics research articles. In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2018. Introduction. In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.