References (51)
References
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word-Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Furhop, Nana. 2002. Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3): 251–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander. 2018. Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist (Picasso): Linguistic aberrancy from a constructional perspective. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 277–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2010. Doubler-upper nouns. A challenge for usage-based models of language? In Cognitive Perspectives on Word-Formation, Alexander Onysko & Sascha Michel (eds), 335–374. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Don. 2008. Fixer-uppers and passers-by: Nominalization of verb-particle constructions. In Studies in the History of Language IV: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Studies of Language Change, Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Sascha Michel (eds), 265–299. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 2006. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David. 2008. Patterns and productivity. In Studies in the History of the English Language VI: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Study of English Language Change, Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Donka Minkova (eds), 207–230. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Richard M. W. 2014. Making New Words. Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farrel, Patrick. 2005. English verb-preposition constructions: constituency and order. Language 81(1): 96–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortin, Antonio. 2012. The Morphology and Semantics of Expressive Affixes. Oxford: University of Oxford. [URL].Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2016. Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In Approaches to Complex Predicates, Léa Nash & Pollet Samvelian (eds), 110–141. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Good, Jeff. 2016. The Linguistic Typology of Templates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(7): 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2018. Creativity and Construction Grammar: Cognitive and psychological issues. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 259–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2020. Construction Grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology, and cognitive science. Cognitive Semiotics. 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian. 1999. ’Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres. The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1973. The base rules for prepositional phrases. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 345–356. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munsgard.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Michaelis, Laura A. (2020) Syntactic Constructions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klégr, Aleš & Čermak, Jan. 2010. Neologisms of the ‘on-the-pattern-of’ type: analogy as a word-formation process? In The Prague Structure and Theories of Structure, Martin Procháska, Markéta Malá & Pavlína Šaldová (eds), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1969. A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Lensch, Anke. 2018. Fixer-uppers: Reduplication in the derivation of phrasal verbs. In Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse, Rita Finkbeiner & Ulrike Freywald (eds), 158–181. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou, Blom, Corrien, Booij, Geert, Elenbaas, Marian & van Kemenade, Ans. 2012. Morphosyntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matinello, Elisa. 2013. Extra-Grammatical Morphology in English. Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew. 2004. Sum: English Affix Reduplication. The Linguist List 15.1929.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary D. 2014. Lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. online edition.Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda. 2001. A conceptional analysis of English -er nominals. In Applied Coginitive Linguistics in Language Pedagogy, Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier & René Driven (eds), 149–200. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2013. Conventional implicature and expressive content. In Semantics. An international Handbook of natural language meaning, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), Volume 3, 598-621 .Berlin; Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2003. Cognitive complexity and ‘horror aequi’ as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryder, Mary Ellen. 1999. Bankers and Blue-chippers. Of -er nominalizations in Present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 269–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryder, Mary Ellen. 2000. Complex -er nominals: Where grammaticalization and lexicalization meet? In Between Grammar and Lexicon, Ellen Contini-Morava & Yishai Tobin (eds), 291–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2016. Two ideas of creativity. In Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language, Martin Hinton (ed), 15–26. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT-Press.Google Scholar
The Times 2017. The Times Style Guide. Glasgow: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Thim, Stefan. 2012. Phrasal Verbs: The English Verb-Particle Construction and Its History. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uhrig, Peter. 2020. Creative intentions – The fine line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’. Cognitive Semiotics. 1–19.Google Scholar
Walker, James. 2009. Double -er suffixation in English. Morphological, phonological and sociolinguistic reflections. Lexis – Journal in English Lexicology HS 1: 5–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wentworth, Harold. 1936. On adding the suffix of agency, -ER, to adverbs. American Speech 11: 245–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2): 369–370.Google Scholar
Zeschel, Arne. 2012. Incipient Productivity: A Construction-Based Approach to Linguistic Creativity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Belén López Meirama
2024.  Vete a freír cristales . Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Lensch, Anke
2023. English and German derivation revisited. Constructions and Frames 15:2  pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2023.  Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach. Yearbook of Phraseology 14:1  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2024. Un hambre que da calambre. Creativity and extravagance in the context of a family of consecutive constructional idioms. CogniTextes Volume 25 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.