They’re proing it up hardcore
An analysis of the V it up construction
The V it up construction expresses an exuberant or excessive performance of the activity denoted by the verb. The present study uses data from Twitter and the Urban Dictionary to analyse current uses of V it up. It employs the frameworks of extravagance (Haspelmath 1999/Keller 1994), expressiveness (Zwicky & Pullum 1987) and gradual transitivity (Hopper & Thompson 1980) to assess the range of heads that partake in the construction and the way it marks these as verbs. Results show that the construction is productively used with verbs converted from various word-classes and even with phrases in the open slot. The construction’s ability to take these extravagant heads goes hand in hand with its penchant for imperatives and progressives, which emphasise the action and are thus excellent verbalisers.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Properties of the V it up construction
- 2.1Linguistic description of V it up and its components
- 2.2Speakers’ intuitions about V it up
- 3.Extravagance, expressiveness and transitivity
- 3.1Extravagance
- 3.2Expressiveness
- 3.3Transitivity and prototypicality
- 4.Data and method
- 5.Analysis: V it up on Twitter
- 5.1Promiscuity with regard to input category & input basehood
- 5.2Transitivity and prototypicality
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References (39)
References
Aitchison, Jean. 2003. Metaphors, models and language change. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed), 39–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allerton, David. 1982. Valency and the English Verb. New York: Academic Press.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.
Cappelle, Bert. 2005. Particle Patterns in English. A Comprehensive Coverage. Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Cole, Peter. 1983. The Grammatical Role of the Causee in Universal Grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics 49(2): 115–133.
Depallday. 2011. World Series of Poker down to three. 8 November 2011, <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
Declerck, Renaat. 2011. The definition of modality. In Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect, and Epistemic Modality, Patard, Adeline & Brisard, Frank (eds), 21-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Declerck, Renaat, Reed, Susan & Cappelle, Bert. 2006. The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase. Volume 1: The Grammar of the English Tense System: A Comprehensive Analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619.
Fitzgerald, Tom & Marquez, Lorenzo. 2013. WERQ: Bruce Willis in Dolce&Gabbana at the “Red 2” Premiere. Tom & Lorenzo. 12 July 2013. <[URL]> (20 April, 2020).
Fraser, James B. 1961. An Examination of the Verb-Particle Construction in English. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Gardelle, Laure. 2011. Whoop her up, hit it, go it alone: The role of the personal pronoun in the fossilization process. Yearbook of Phraseology 2: 163–178.
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. Volume II. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, Adele. 2016. Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In Approaches to Complex Predicates, Léa Nash & Pollet Samvelian (eds), 110–141. Leiden: Brill.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299.
Keller, Rudi. 1994. Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Mondorf, Britta. 2016. ‘Snake legs it to freedom’: Dummy it as pseudo-object. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(1): 73–102.
Mondorf, Britta & Schneider, Ulrike. 2016. Detransitivization as a support strategy for causative bring. English Language and Linguistics 20(3): 439–462.
New Oxford American Dictionary, s.v. “yuck2”, 2011, <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
OED Online, s.v. “extravagant, adj. and n.”, March 2020 <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
OED Online, s.v. “ham, v.2.”, March 2020. <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
OED Online, s.v. “jazz, v.”, March 2020. <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
OED Online, s.v. “keep, v.”, March 2020. <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
OED Online, s.v. “live, v.”, March 2020. <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
Peckham, Aaron. 2005. Urban Dictionary. Fularious Street Slang Defined. Kansas, MO: Andrews McMeel.
Postal, Paul M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1988. Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4): 635–670.
Quayle, Nigel. 1994. UP et le verbe à particule en anglais contemporain. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. Zur Einführung und Behauptung lexikalischer Einheiten durch syntaktische Struktursignale im Englischen. In Lexical Structures and Language Use. Proceedings of the International Conference on Lexicology and Lexical Semantics Münster, September 13–15, 1994, Edda Weigand & Franz Hundsnurscher (eds), 105–117. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Rose, Ashley. 2017. Sugar and cloth. Instagram, 16 December 2017, <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
Scherl, Magdalena. 2018. TwitterCorpusQuery 2.0. Mainz.
Sheridan, Thomas. 1780. A General Dictionary of the English Language. London: Dodsley, Dilly and Wilkie.
Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Urban Dictionary, s.v. “-ing it up”, 4 August 2004, <[URL]> (20 April 2020)
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1987. Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1987, John Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds), 330–340.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Belén López Meirama
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.