Cover not available
Part of
Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective
Edited by Alessandra Barotto and Simone Mattiola
[Studies in Language Companion Series 227] 2023
► pp. 65–89

Chapter 4
The use of interjections as a discourse phenomenon

A contrastive study of Chuvash (Turkic) and Wan (Mande)

 | CNRS-LACITO
 | CNRS-LACITO
 | University of Picardie Jules Verne
This study describes and compares two conventionalized uses of interjections in traditional narratives in Chuvash (Turkic) and Wan (Mande). First, interjections are shown to be associated with a quotative function: they help signal instances of reported speech. The use of interjections interacts with the grammatical marking of reported speech: the presence of an interjection is negatively correlated with the presence of a grammaticalized quotative element. Second, in Chuvash, but not in Wan, interjections are used, outside the context of reported speech, to emphasize an event’s intensity or duration. We relate the absence of an intensifying function in Wan to competition between interjections and ideophones. The two phenomena shed light on the interaction between interjections and language-specific grammatical and lexical resources.
Keywords: interjections, Mande, Turkic, reported speech, narrative grammar
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The quotative function
    • 2.1Interjections help signal reported speech
    • 2.2In the context of reported speech, interjections tend towards initial positions
    • 2.3The prosody of quotative uses
  • 3.Functions outside reported speech
    • 3.1The intensifying use in Chuvash
    • 3.2The prosody of the intensifying use
    • 3.3Absence of the intensifying use in Wan
  • 4.Heterogeneity among interjections
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 1 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.227.04nik
References (39)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2004. Interjections in a contrastive perspective. In Emotion in Dialogic Interaction: Advances in the Complex [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 248], Edda Weigand (ed), 99–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix. 1992. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2–3): 101–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aznar, Jocelyn. 2021. Silent gaps as a distinctive feature of direct speech: A corpus study of Nisvai narratives, Vanuatu. Presentation at the Workshop “From Dialogue to Grammar”, University of Helsinki.
Chanard, Christian. 2015. ELAN-CorpA: Lexicon-aided annotation in ELAN. In Corpus-based Studies of Lesser-described Languages: The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 68], Amina Mettouchi, Martine Vanhove & Dominique Caubet (eds), 311–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 2011. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2017. On the margins of language ideophones, interjections and dependencies in linguistic theory. In Dependencies in Language: On the Causal Ontology of Linguistic Systems, Nicholas J. Enfield (ed), 193–202. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Drescher, Martina. 1997. French interjections and their use in discourse: Ah dis donc les vieux souvenirs. In The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation, Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds), 233–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas J. 2013. Some problems in the typology of quotation: A canonical approach. In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 48–98. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hantgan, Abbie. 2020. Dogon reported discourse markers: The Ben Tey quotative topicalizer. Folia Linguistica 54(3): 581–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2021. Turkic. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klewitz, Gabriele & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1999. Quote – unquote? The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics 9(4): 459–485.Google Scholar
Knyazev, Mikhail. 2019. Two ‘say’-complementizers in Poshkart Chuvash: Subject-orientation, logophoricity and indexical shift under verbs of hearing. In Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL14) [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 90], Tatiana Bondarenko, Colin Davis, Justin Colley & Dmitry Privoznov (eds), 137–144. Cambridge MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul. 2003. The meanings of interjections in Q’eqchi’ Maya: From emotive reaction to social and discursive action. Current Anthropology 44(4): 467–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diana. 2012. Utterance reports and constructed action. In Sign Language: An International Handbook, Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds), 365–387. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez Caro, Elena & Borreguero, Margarita. 2016. Discourse markers in reported speech: Evidence from English and Spanish. Presentation at the FDG Conference, Vienna.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir & Otaina, Galina. 2013. A Syntax of the Nivkh Language: The Amur Dialect [Studies in Language Companion Series 139]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2012a. Personal deixis and reported discourse: Towards a typology of person alignment. Linguistic Typology 16(2): 233–263.Google Scholar
. 2012b. Logophoric discourse and first person reporting in Wan (West Africa). Anthropological Linguistics 54(3): 280–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. When linguists and speakers do not agree: The endangered grammar of verbal art in West Africa. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28(2): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Bugaeva, Anna. 2021. Logophoric speech is not indirect: Towards a syntactic approach to reported speech constructions. Linguistics 59(3): 609–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Hantgan, Abbie & Chanard, Christian. 2019. Reported speech annotation template for ELAN. Villejuif: LLACAN. [URL]Google Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana, Aplonova, Ekaterina, Hantgan-Sonko, Abbie, Jordanoska, Izabela & Perekhvalskaya, Elena (eds). In preparation. The SpeechReporting Corpus: Discourse Reporting in Storytelling. Villejuif-Paris: CNRS-LLACAN. [URL]
Nikitina, Tatiana & Vydrina, Alexandra. 2020. Reported speech in Kakabe: Loose syntax with flexible indexicality. Folia Linguistica 54(1): 133–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 2009. Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics 41(5): 866–891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Interjections. In Corpus Pragmatics, Karin Aijmer & Christoph Rühlemann (eds), 249–279. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Daniel & Kowal, Sabine & Ageneau, Carie. 2005. Interjections in interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34(2):153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep. 2011. Reporting and quoting in signed discourse. In Understanding Quotation, Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds), 277–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravenhill, Philip L. 1982. The Wan language. Mandenkan 4: 57–69.Google Scholar
No date. Philip L. Ravenhill papers, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution.
Reinöhl, Uta & Casaretto, Antje. 2018. When grammaticalization does not occur: Prosody-syntax mismatches in Indo-Aryan. Diachronica 35(2): 238–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savelyev, Alexander. 2020. Chuvash and the Bulgharic languages. In The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages, Martine Robbeets & Alexander Savelyev (eds), 446–464. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spronck, Stef & Nikitina, Tatiana. 2019. Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology 23(1): 119–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 1995. Interjections in Early Modern English: From imitation of spoken to conventions of written language. In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35], Andreas H. Jucker (ed), 439–465. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Interjections in early popular literature: Stereotype and innovation. In Voices Past and Present: Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 97], Ewa Jonsson & Tove Larsson (eds), 79–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wharton, Tim. 2003. Interjections, language, and the “showing/saying” continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition 11(1): 39–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1991. Interjections across cultures. In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction, Werner Winter (ed), 285–340. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David. 1992. Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2–3): 119–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar