Chapter 5
Towards a radically usage-based account of constructional attrition
Integrating subtractive language developments in the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization model
This chapter reflects on how the gradual disappearance of a construction from a language can be accounted for in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar through an exploration of how the phenomenon can be accommodated in Schmid’s (2020) Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization model. This theory of the dynamics of the linguistic system is radical in its usage-based account in that it separates collective conventionalization from individual entrenchment and models how they interact in usage. Schmid focuses on the accumulative dynamics of the system, however, and gives scant attention to subtractive/attritional developments. Considering diachronic corpus data on the decline of the Deontic nci construction, the chapter brings to bear the EC-model’s conceptual apparatus to gauge the role of individual speakers in language-level constructional attrition.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A radically usage-based model of language (change)
- 3.The role of the individual in constructional attrition
- 3.1Preamble: constructional attrition as phenomenon and area of investigation
- 3.2The decline of the Deontic nci construction in the Late Modern English period
- 3.3Constructional attrition in a radically usage-based based model of language (change)
- 4.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (58)
References
Anthonissen, Lynn. 2020. Cognition in construction grammar. Connecting individual and community grammars. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2): 309–337.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smirnova, Elena, Sommerer, Lotte & Gildea, Spike (eds). 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics. Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503) [Topics in English Linguistics 51]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2015. Individual differences in grammatical knowledge. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 650–667. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2016. Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4): 479–491.
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2017. Ten Lectures on Grammar in the Mind [Distinguished Lectures in Cognitive Linguistics 12]. Leiden: Brill.
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2020. Language as a phenomenon of the third kind. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2): 213–229.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2016. How gradual change progresses. The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28(1): 83–102.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2020. What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2): 251–278.
Disney, Steve. 2016. Another visit to be supposed to from a diachronic constructionist perspective. English Studies 97(8): 892–916.
Divjak, Dagmar, Levshina, Natalia & Klavan, Jane. 2016. Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4): 447–463.
Evans, Vyvyan. 2012. Cognitive linguistics. WIREs Cognitive Science 3(2): 129–141.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Recontextualizing grammar. Underlying trends in thirty years of Cognitive Linguistics. In Cognitive Linguistics in Action: From Theory to Application and Back [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 14], Elżbieta Tabakowska, Michał Choiński & Łukasz Wiraszka (eds), 71–102. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions. A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5): 219–224.
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
Hilpert, Martin. 2019 [2014]. Construction Grammar and its Application to English, 2nd edn. [Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language – Advanced]. Edinburgh: EUP.
Hilpert, Martin. 2021. Ten Lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar [Distinguished Lectures in Cognitive Linguistics 26]. Leiden: Brill.
Johnstone, Barbara. 1996. The Linguistic Individual. Self-expression in Language and Linguistics [Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]. Oxford: OUP.
Johnstone, Barbara. 2000. The individual voice in language. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 405–424.
Jurafsky, Daniel. 1992. An on-line computational model of human sentence interpretation. In AAAI-92 Proceedings, San Jose, California, 302–308. Cambridge MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
Kemmer, Suzanne & Barlow, Michael. 2000. A usage-based conception of language. [LAUD Paper No. 295]. Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen.
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1. Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. A usage-based model. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50], Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed), 127–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology [Cognitive Linguistics Research 15], Theo Janssen & Gisela Redeker (eds), 13–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2013. Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality [Topics in English Linguistics 81], Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero Lapeyre, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 95–115. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21(2): 339–384.
Myhill, John. 1995. Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics 33(2): 157–211.
Nevalainen, Terttu, Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Mannila, Heikki. 2011. The diffusion of language change in real time. Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change 23(1): 1–43.
Noël, Dirk. 2008. The nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English. A diachronic constructionist approach. Journal of English Linguistics 36(4): 314–340.
Noël, Dirk. 2017. The development of non-deontic be bound to in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua 199: 72–93.
Noël, Dirk. Under review. Culture in a radically usage-based model of language change, with special reference to constructional attrition.
Noël, Dirk & Colleman, Timothy. 2021. Diachronic construction grammar. In The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Wen Xu & John R. Taylor (eds), 662–675. London: Routledge.
Petré, Peter & Anthonissen, Lynn. 2020. Individuality in complex systems. A constructionist approach. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2): 185–212.
Petré, Peter & Van de Velde, Freek. 2018. The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language 94(4): 867–901.
Rudnicka, Karolina. 2019. The Statistics of Obsolescence. Purpose Subordinators in Late Modern English. Strasbourg/Basel/Freiburg: EUCOR – The European Campus/Universität Basel/University of Freiburg.
Sankoff, Gillian. 2005. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in sociolinguistics. In Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, Vol. 2, Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier & Peter Trudgill (eds), 1002–1013. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2015. A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 3: 1–27.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The Dynamics of the Linguistic System. Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: OUP.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Mantlik, Annette. 2015. Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133(4): 583–623.
Tagliamonti, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2007. Frequency and variation in the community grammar. Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 19(2): 199–217.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2022a. Ten Lectures on a Diachronic Constructionalist Approach to Discourse Structuring Markers. [Distinguished Lectures in Cognitive Linguistics 27]. Leiden: Brill.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.
Wagner, Suzanne Evans & Sankoff, Gillian. 2011. Age grading in the Montréal French inflected future. Language Variation and Change 23(3): 275–313.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2006. English. Meaning and Culture. Oxford: OUP.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.