Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 26:2 (2023) ► pp.258275
Abner, Natasha
2011Wh-words that go bump in the right. In Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 24–32.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh
2003Locality in correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3). 485–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branchini, Chiara, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati & Carlo Geraci
2013Wh-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Sign Language & Linguistics 16(2). 157–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bross, Fabian
2020aEncoding different types of topics and foci in German Sign Language: A cartographic approach to sign language syntax. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1): 108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020bThe clausal syntax of German Sign Language: A cartographic approach. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra, William A. Ladusaw & James McCloskey
1995Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3(3). 239–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2016On the double-headed analysis of “headless” relative clauses. In Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds.), Linguistic variation: Structure and interpretation, 169–196. Boston & Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2020The syntax of relative clauses: A unified analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta
2012Locality in wh quantification: Questions and relative clauses in Hindi. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Felser, Claudia
2004Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity. Lingua 114(5). 543–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan Sag
2000Interrogative investigations. Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Groat, Erich
2015Total transfer, dynamic labeling, and transfer remnants. In Günther Grewendorf (ed.), Remnant movement, 257–320. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper
2014Deutsche Gebärdensprache: Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch [German Sign Language: A text- and workbook]. Frankfurt am Main: Fachhochschulverlag.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina & Tonjes Veenstra
2013Introduction. In Katharina Hartmann & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Cleft structures, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy
1990Discourse pragmatics and cleft sentences in English. University of Minnesota PhD dissertation.
2000The referential status of clefts. Language 76(4). 891–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Annika, Sina Proske & Elisabeth Volk
2019Question-answer pairs in sign languages. In Malte Zimmermann, Klaus von Heusinger & Edgar Onea (eds.), Questions in discourse, 96–131. Leiden & Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken & Shinichiro Ishihara
2002Missing links: Cleft, sluicing, and “no da” construction in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 431. 35–54.Google Scholar
2012Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese. Syntax 15(2). 142–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich
1993The split CP hypothesis and the Frisian complementizer system. Ms. Frisian Academy.Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
2000The w-…w-construction: Appositive or scope indicating? In Ulrich Lutz, Gereon Müller & Armin von Stechow (eds.), Beiträge zur deutschen Grammatik, 249–270. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hole, Daniel
2011The deconstruction of Chinese sh…de clefts revisited. Lingua 121(11). 1707–1733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal
1967An integrated theory of linguistic description. Synthese 17(1).Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim
2013Doubling in RSL and NGT: A pragmatic account. In Maria Balbach, Lena Benz, Susanne Genzel, Mira Grubic, Agata Renans, Sören Schalowski, Maja Stegenwallner & Amir Zeldes (eds.), Information structure: Empirical perspectives on theory, 99–118. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, Elena
2012When the quiet surfaces: ‘Transfer’ of argument omission in the speech of ASL-English bilinguals. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut PhD dissertation.
2017Elide me bare: Null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35(2). 397–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koulidobrova, Helen & Leyla Zidani-Eroglu
2018A few arguments for isomorphic sluicing in ASL. Manuscript, online: [URL], received 19 February 2020.
Lobeck, Anne C.
1995Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, Dana
1989Partial and multiple wh-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7(4). 565–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meinunger, André
1998A monoclausal structure for (pseudo-)cleft sentences. In Pius N. Tamanji & Kiyomi Kusumoto (eds.), Proceedings of NELS, vol. 281. 283–298.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2001The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In Jeroen van Craenenbroek & Tanja Temmermann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 19–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Andrew
2016What copying (doesn’t) tell us about movement: Remarks on the derivation wh-copying in German. In Katja Barnickel, Matías Guzmán Naranjo, Johannes Hein, Sampson Korsah, Andrew Murphy, Ludger Paschen, Zorica Puškar & Joanna Zaleska (eds.), Replicative processes in grammar, 149–188. Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Anne Kegl & Benjamin Bahan
1994The architecture of functional categories in American Sign Language. Talk presented at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Nunes, Jairo & Ronice Müller de Quadros
2005Duplication of wh-elements in Brazilian Sign Language. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of NELS, vol. 351. 463–477. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Pankau, Andreas
2014Replacing copies: The syntax of wh-copying in German. Utrecht: University of Utrecht PhD dissertation.
Petronio, Karen
1993Clause structure in American Sign Language. Washington: University of Washington PhD dissertation.
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin
1997WH-movement and the position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 731. 18–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Heleen Bos
2016Syntax: Simple sentences. In Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer (eds.), The linguistics of sign languages: An introduction, 117–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2005Relative clauses in German Sign Language: Extraposition and reconstruction. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of NELS, vol. 351. 507–521. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
2003Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 205–250. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1970On declarative sentences. In Roderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds.), English transformational grammar, 222–272. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rugna, Giuseppe
2020German wh-copying: A top-down analysis. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali 61. 187–219.Google Scholar
Srivastav, Veneeta
1991The syntax and semantics of correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9(4). 637–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2004Ellipsis in Dutch dialects. Leiden: Leiden University PhD dissertation.
2010aComplex wh-phrases don’t move: On the interaction between the split CP-hypothesis and the syntax of wh-movement. In Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), The complementizer phase: Subjects and operators, 236–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010bInvisible last resort: A note on clefts as the underlying source for sluicing. Lingua 120(7). 1714–1726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010cThe syntax of ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Anikó Lipták
2006The crosslinguistic syntax of sluicing: Evidence from Hungarian relatives. Syntax 9(3). 248–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincente, Luis
2019Sluicing and its subtypes. In Jeroen van Craenenbroek & Tanja Temmermann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 117–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie
1996Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. International Review of Sign Linguistics 221. 209–256.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 801. 7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Video - Example 1

Video - Example 4b

Video - Example 4d

Video - Figure 1 (top)

Video - Figure 1 (middle)

Video - Figure 1 (bottom)