Chapter 11
Renewing a social action in US primary care
One sequential context when actions formatted as polar questions do not require polar answers
We consider a specific polar-interrogative offer by physicians (e.g., Is there something/anything
else you’d like to address in the visit today?). We show that in one sequential context this interrogative
obligates the production of a yes-/no-type answer, receiving one over 80% of the time.
However, in a different sequential context, we show that the identical interrogative receives a yes-/no-type-
answer less than 20% of the time. In this latter context it renews a social action implemented by a prior
Wh-solicitation (e.g., What can I do for you?). We offer a characterization that makes our
finding broadly applicable to a variety of contexts, begins to account for some of Geoffrey Raymond’s non-type-conforming
cases, and hence refines his principle of type conformity. Our finding highlights the pervasive relevance of sequential
context for the production and understanding of talk.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Preliminaries
- 3.Data
- 4.Results and analysis
- 4.1Polar questions that typically do not receive Yes-type answers
- 4.2Polar questions that typically do receive Yes-type answers
- 5.Discrepant cases
- 6.Discussion
-
Notes
-
References