Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 34:4 (2022) ► pp.602–627

Time pressure in translation

Psychological and physiological measures

 | Durham University
ORCID logo | Durham University
 | Zhejiang University
Translators may experience significant psychological and physiological responses to time pressure. This study examines such responses with the aim of identifying valid indicators of time pressure in written translation. Forty-five postgraduates participated in the study, translating three comparable English texts into Chinese under three time conditions (Short, Standard, and Free). A positive relation between time stringency and the arousal level detected by a set of self-reporting and biomarker measures was hypothesised. The hypothesis was corroborated by results derived from participants’ self-reporting on stress and anxiety, and the biomarkers of heart rate, blood pressure, and pupil dilation, but not by skin temperature, galvanic skin response (GSR), and heart rate variability (HRV). Thus, the measures that confirm the hypothesis are considered successful indicators of time pressure in translation. In addition, an inverted ‘U-shaped’ pattern was observed in the relation between time stringency and the arousal level indexed by GSR and HRV. These findings may facilitate research and training in translation and other cognitively demanding language-processing activities.
Keywords: time pressure, stress measurement, written translation, psychometric instrument, physiological stress response
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Methodological considerations
    • 1.2Existing translation and interpreting research on time pressure or stress
    • 1.3The present study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Time constraints
    • 2.4Apparatus
    • 2.5Procedure
    • 2.6Data processing and analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Psychological measures
    • 3.2Physiological measures
    • 3.3Correlations among the psychological and physiological measures
    • 3.4Results from the trimmed dataset
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Psychological effects
    • 4.2Physiological effects
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.20148.wen
References (50)
References
Alves, Fabio, and Tânia Liparini Campos. 2009. “Translation Technology in Time: Investigating the Impact of Translation Memory Systems and Time Pressure on Types of Internal and External Support.” In Behind the Mind: Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research, edited by Susanne Göpferich, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, and Inger M. Mees, 191–218. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Angelone, Erik. 2010. “Uncertainty, Uncertainty Management and Metacognitive Problem Solving in the Translation Task.” In Translation and Cognition, edited by Gregory M. Shreve and Erik Angelone, 17–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baghi, Hoorieh, and Masood Khoshsaligheh. 2019. “Stress in Written and Sight Translation in Training Setting.” Hikma 18 (2): 237–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakdash, Jonathan Z., and Laura R. Marusich. 2017. “Repeated Measures Correlation.” Frontiers in Psychology 81: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lmer4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer-Hohenwarter, Gerrit. 2009. “Methodological Reflections on the Experimental Design of Time-Pressure Studies.” Across Languages and Cultures 10 (2): 193–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedek, Mathias, and Christian Kaernbach. 2010. “A Continuous Measure of Phasic Electrodermal Activity.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods 190 (1): 80–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiang, Yung-Nan. 2009. “Foreign Language Anxiety in Taiwanese Student Interpreters.” Meta 54 (3): 605–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Foreign Language Anxiety and Student Interpreters’ Learning Outcomes: Implications for the Theory and Measurement of Interpretation Learning Anxiety.” Meta 55 (3): 589–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Cary L., Rachel Davies, and Rosalie L. Tung. 1982. “Interpreting Stress: Sources of Job Stress among Conference Interpreters.” Multilingua 1 (2): 97–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Critchley, Hugo D. 2002. “Review: Electrodermal Responses: What Happens in the Brain.” The Neuroscientist 8 (2): 132–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daviu, Nuria, Michael R. Bruchas, Bita Moghaddam, Carmen Sandi, and Anna Beyeler. 2019. “Neurobiological Links between Stress and Anxiety.” In Stress Neurobiology Workshop 2018, edited by Lawrence Reagan, Richard Hunter, and Matthew N. Hill, special issue of Neurobiology of Stress 111: 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fink, George, ed. 2007. Encyclopedia of Stress. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ghobadi, Mehdi, Golnaz Madadi, and Bahareh Najafian. 2017. “A Study of the Effects of Time Pressure on Translation Quantity and Quality.” International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies 5 (2): 7–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Gyde. 2006. “Time Pressure in Translation Teaching and Translation Studies.” In Interdisciplinarité en Traduction: Proceedings of the IInd International Colloquium on Translation organised by Yildiz Technical University, vol. II1, edited by Sündüz Öztürk Kasar, 71–80. Istanbul: Les Éditions Isis.Google Scholar
Hart, Sandra G., and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research.” In Human Mental Workload, edited by Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati, 139–183. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jankowiak, Katarzyna, and Paweł Korpal. 2018. “On Modality Effects in Bilingual Emotional Language Processing: Evidence from Galvanic Skin Response.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47 (3): 663–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jennings, J. Richard. 2007. “Heart Rate.” In Fink 2007, 274–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Astrid, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen. 2000. “Translating under Time Pressure: An Empirical Investigation of Problem-Solving Activity and Translation Strategies by Non-professional and Professional Translators.” In Translation in Context: Selected Contributions from the EST Congress, Granada 1998, edited by Andrew Chesterman, Natividad Gallardo San Salvador, and Yves Gambier, 105–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Kristian Tangsgaard Hvelplund. 2009. “Indicators of Text Complexity.” In Behind the Mind: Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research, edited by Susanne Göpferich, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, and Inger M. Mees, 61–80. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Kao, Po-Chi, and Philip Craigie. 2013. “Evaluating Student Interpreters’ Stress and Coping Strategies.” Social Behavior and Personality 41 (6): 1035–1043. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klonowicz, Tatiana. 1994. “Putting One’s Heart into Simultaneous Interpretation.” In Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, edited by Sylvie Lambert and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 213–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korpal, Paweł. 2016. “Interpreting as a Stressful Activity: Physiological Measures of Stress in Simultaneous Interpreting.” In Language Processing in Translation, edited by Bogusława Whyatt, special issue of Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52 (2): 297–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korpal, Paweł, and Aleksandra Jasielska. 2019. “Investigating Interpreters’ Empathy: Are Emotions in Simultaneous Interpreting Contagious?” Target 31 (1): 2–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurz, Ingrid. 2002. “Physiological Stress Responses during Media and Conference Interpreting.” In Interpreting in the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities, edited by Giuliana Garzone and Maurizio Viezzi, 195–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Physiological Stress During Simultaneous Interpreting: A Comparison of Experts and Novices.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 121: 51–67.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff, and Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen. 2017. “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 82 (13): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyriakou, Kalliopi, Bernd Resch, Günther Sagl, Andreas Petutschnig, Christian Werner, David Niederseer, Michael Liedlgruber, Frank H. Wilhelm, Tess Osborne, and Jessica Pykett. 2019. “Detecting Moments of Stress from Measurements of Wearable Physiological Sensors.” Sensors 19 (17): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S. 1976. Patterns of Adjustment. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Luque-Casado, Antonio, José C. Perales, David Cárdenas, and Daniel Sanabria. 2016. “Heart Rate Variability and Cognitive Processing: The Autonomic Response to Task Demands.” Biological Psychology 1131: 83–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maule, A. John, and G. Robert J. Hockey. 1993. “State, Stress, and Time Pressure.” In Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, edited by Ola Svenson and A. John Maule, 83–101. New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Richard. 2007. “Fight-or-Flight Response.” In Fink 2007, 62–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minkel, Jared, and Samantha Phillips. 2015. “Methodological Considerations When Integrating Experimental Manipulations of Sleep and Emotion.” In Sleep and Affect, edited by Kimberly A. Babson and Matthew T. Feldner, 119–138. London: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara. 2005. “Remote Interpreting: The Crucial Role of Presence.” Bulletin VALS-ASLA (Swiss Association of Applied Linguistics) 811: 73–97.Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara, Alexander Künzli, and Marina Korac. 1998. “Prolonged Turns in Interpreting: Effects on Quality, Physiological and Psychological Stress (Pilot Study).” Interpreting 3 (1): 47–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nourbakhsh, Nargess, Fang Chen, Yang Wang, and Rafael A. Calvo. 2017. “Detecting Users’ Cognitive Load by Galvanic Skin Response with Affective Interference.” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 7 (3): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paas, Fred, Juhani E. Tuovinen, Huib Tabbers, and Pascal W. M. Van Gerven. 2003. “Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 63–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partala, Timo, and Veikko Surakka. 2003. “Pupil Size Variation as an Indication of Affective Processing.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (1–2): 185–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pijeira-Díaz, Héctor J., Hendrik Drachsler, Paul A. Kirschner, and Sanna Järvelä. 2018. “Profiling Sympathetic Arousal in a Physics Course: How Active Are Students?” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 34 (4): 397–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing”. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Accessed December 1, 2021. [URL]
Rastegary, Haleh, and Frank J. Landy. 1993. “The Interactions among Time Urgency, Uncertainty, and Time Pressure.” In Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, edited by Ola Svenson and A. John Maule, 217–239. New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojo, Ana, and Marina Ramos Caro. 2016. “Can Emotion Stir Translation Skill? Defining the Impact of Positive and Negative Emotions on Translation Performance.” In Reembedding Translation Process Research, edited by Ricardo Muñoz Martín, 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seeber, Kilian G. 2013. “Cognitive Load in Simultaneous Interpreting: Measures and Methods.” Target 25 (1): 18–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharmin, Selina, Oleg Špakov, Kari-Jouko Räihä, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen. 2008. “Where and for How Long Do Translators Look at the Screen while Translating?” In Looking at Eyes: Eye-tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing, edited by Susanne Göpferich, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, and ‎Inger M. Mees, 31–51. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Andrew, and Robert A. Carels. 2007. “Blood Pressure.” In Fink 2007, 335–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slavich, George M., Sara Taylor, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2019. “Stress Measurement Using Speech: Recent Advancements, Validation Issues, and Ethical and Privacy Considerations.” Stress 22 (4): 408–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, Charles D., Richard Gorsuch, Robert E. Lushene, Peter R. Vagg, and Gerard A. Jacobs. 1983. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Tarvainen, Mika P., Juha-Pekka Niskanen, Jukka A. Lipponen, Perttu O. Ranta-aho, and Pasi A. Karjalainen. 2014. “Kubios HRV – Heart Rate Variability Analysis Software.” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 113 (1): 210–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tobii Technology. 2016. “Tobii Studio User’s Manual.” Accessed December 1, 2021. [URL]
Wemm, Stephanie E., and Edelgard Wulfert. 2017. “Effects of Acute Stress on Decision Making.” Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 42 (1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Ogasawara, Kanae, Takahiko Koike, Masaki Fukunaga, Ayumi Yoshioka, Tetsuya Yamamoto & Norihiro Sadato
2024. Neural substrates of choking under pressure: A 7T-fMRI study. Neuroscience Research DOI logo
A.S. Mohammed, Tawffeek
2023. Translating Islamic Media Discourse from Arabic into English: An Analysis of Translation Process. In Translatology, Translation and Interpretation - Toward a New Scientific Endeavor, DOI logo
Li, Saihong, Yifang Wang & Yubo Zhou Rasmussen
2022. Studying interpreters’ stress in crisis communication: evidence from multimodal technology of eye-tracking, heart rate and galvanic skin response. The Translator 28:4 ► pp. 468 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Xiangyan, Xiangling Wang & Xiaodong Liu
2022. The impact of task complexity and translating self-efficacy belief on students’ translation performance: Evidence from process and product data. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Zhu, Xuelian & Vahid Aryadoust
2022. A Synthetic Review of Cognitive Load in Distance Interpreting: Toward an Explanatory Model. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.