Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 24:2 (2012) ► pp.338–354

Load-managed problem formats

Scaffolding and modeling the translation task to improve transfer

 | Kent State University
Does the “expert blind spot”, our “unconscious competence”, lead us to undermine the effectiveness of our translation assignments? This study characterizes the translation task as schema-based, and thus prone to cognitive overload for the learner. Accordingly, schema acquisition tasks featuring reduced-goal specificity and goal-free problems for training the novice are reviewed. The argument is put forward that we need 1) to use more scaffolding to reduce cognitive load, 2) to vary task architecture for learning (including the use of planning pre-tasks), and 3) to provide diagnostic help for the student translator to attain context-independence for ‘high road transfer’. Formats for expertise modeling are considered—reverse tasks, completion examples, and other whole-task models—as instructional designs for load-managed translation tasks that improve problemsolving, schema acquisition, process-orientation, and metacognitive monitoring.
Keywords: cognitive load (intrinsic, extraneous, germane), task design, unconscious competence, whole-task training, context-independence, scaffolding, transfer, modeling, goal-free problems
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 2.Partial tasks, whole tasks, and schema development
    • 3.Cognitive load and the ‘expert blind spot’ in translation task construction
    • 4.Transfer and context-independence
    • 5.Process-oriented information and metacognition
    • 6.Tasks for modeling expertise
      • 6.1Planning
      • 6.2Whole-task models
    • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 February 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.24.2.06was
References (51)
References
Ambrose, Susan A., Michael W. Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Marsha C. Lovett, and Marie K. Norman. 2010. How Learning Works: Seven Research-based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S. 1960. The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ruth Colvin, and Richard E. Mayer. 2008. E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
Clark, Ruth Colvin. 2010. Evidence-based Training Methods: A Guide for Training Professionals. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ruth Colvin, Frank Nguyen, and John Sweller. 2006. Efficiency in Learning: Evidencebased Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Collins, Allan, John Seely Brown, and Susan E. Newman. 1989. “Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics”. In Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, ed. by L. Resnick, 453–494. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Craig, Ian, and Sanchez, Jairo. 2007. A Translation Manual for the Caribbean (English-Spanish)/ Un manual de traducción para el Caribe (Inglés-Español). Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.Google Scholar
Darwish, Ali. “Towards a Theory of Constraints in Translation”. Draft version 0.2. 1–32. [URL].
Druckman, Daniel, and Robert A. Bjork (eds). . 1991. In the Mind’s Eye: Enhancing Human Performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Englund Dimitrova, Birgitta. 2005. Expertise and Explicitation in the Translation Process. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, Norman. 1984. “Implications of Cognitive Theory for Instruction in Problem Solving”. Review of Educational Research 54 (3): 363–407.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, Robert M.. 1965. The Conditions of Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Ge, Xun, and Susan M. Land, 2004. “A Conceptual Framework for Scaffolding Ill-Structured Problem-solving Processes Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions”. Educational Technology Research and Development. 52 (2): 5–22.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerjets, Peter, Katharina Scheiter, and Richard Catrambone. 2004. “Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures”. Instructional Science 321: 33–58.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gick, Mary L., and Keith J. Holyoak. 1983. “Schema Induction and Analogical Transfer”. Cognitive Psychology 151: 1–38.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González z Davies, Maria. 2004. Multiple Voices in the Translation Classroom: Activities, Tasks, and Projects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halff, Henry M.. 1993. “Supporting Scenario- and Simulation-based Instruction”. In Automating Instructional Design: Concepts and Issues, ed. by J. Michael Spector, Martha Polson, and Daniel J. Muraida, 231–248. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Hannafin, Michael, Susan Land, and Kevin Oliver. 1999. “Open Learning Environments: Foundations, Methods, and Models”. In Instructional-design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, ed. by Charles M. Reigeluth, 115–140. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hayes, John R., and Jane G. Nash. 1996. “On the Nature of Planning in Writing”. In The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by C. Michael Levy and Sarah Ellen Ransdell, 29–55. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kalyuga, Slava. 2010. “Schema Acquisition and Sources of Cognitive Load”. In Cognitive Load Theory, ed. by Jan L. Plass, Roxana Moreno, and Roland, Brünken, 48–64. New York: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kester, Liesbeth, Fred Paas, and Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer. 2010. “Instructional Control of Cognitive Load in the Design of Complex Learning Environments”. In Cognitive Load Theory, ed. by Jan L. Plass, Roxana Moreno, and Roland Brünken, 109–130. New York: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiraly, Don. 2005. “Project-based Learning: A Case for Situated Translation”. Meta: Journal des traducteurs / Meta:Ttranslators’ Journal 50 (4): 1098–1111.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krajcik, Joseph, and Phyllis Blumenfeld. 2002. “Project Based Learning”. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, ed. by R. Keith Sawyer, 317–334. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maton, Karl. 2009. “Cumulative and Segmented Learning: Exploring the Role of Curriculum Structures in Knowledge-building”. British Journal of Sociology of Education 30 (1): 43–57.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nadolski, Rob J.. 2004. “Process Support for Learning Tasks in Multimedia Practicals”. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Open University of the Netherlands, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Naylor, J.C., and G.E. Briggs. 1963. “The Effect of Task Complexity and Task Organisation on the Relative Efficiency of Part or Whole Training Methods.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 651: 217–224.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newell, Allen, and Herbert Simon. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane. 1991. Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-oriented Text Analysis. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Training Functional Translators.” In Training for the New Millenium, ed. by Martha Tennent, 209–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, Elizabeth, and John Sweller. 1985. “What do Students Learn while Solving Mathematics Problems?”. Journal of Educational Psychology 771: 272–284.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palincsar, Annemarie Sullivan, and Anne L. Brown. 1984. “Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-fostering and Comprehension Monitoring Activities.” Cognition and Iinstruction 1 (2): 117–175.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reigeluth, Charles M. 1999. “The Elaboration Theory: Guidance for Scope and Sequence Decisions.” In Instructional-design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory: Vol. 21, ed. by Charles M. Reigeluth, 425–453. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Renkl, Alexander. 2002. “Worked-out Examples: Instructional Explanations Support Learning by Self-explanations.” Learning and Instruction 12 (5): 529–556.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David, and Norman, Donald. 1978. “Accretion, Tuning and Restructuring: Three Modes of Learning.” In Semantic Factors in Cognition, ed. by John W. Cotton and Roberta Klatzky, 37–54. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Salden, Ron, Fred Paas, and Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer. 2006. “A Comparison of Approaches to Learning Task Selection in the Training of Complex Cognitive Skills.” Computers in Human Behavior 221: 321–333.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salomon, Gavriel, and David Perkins. 1989. “Rocky Roads to Transfer: Re-thinking Mechanisms of a Neglected Phenomenon.” Educational psychologist 24 (2): 112–142.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schunk, Dale, and Barry J. Zimmerman. 1998. Self-regulated Learning: From Teaching to Selfreflective Practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1980. “Problem Solving and Education.” In Problem Solving and Education: Issues in Teaching and Research, ed. by David T. Tuma and Frederick Reif, 81–96. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sweller, John. 1988. “Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning.” Cognitive Science. 12 (2): 257–285.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. “Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design.” Learning and Instruction 4 (4): 295–312.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Cognitive Load Theory: Recent Theoretical Advances.” In Cognitive Load Theory, ed. by Jan L. Plass, Roxana Moreno, and Roland Brünken, 29–47. New York: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teague, Ross C., Stuart S. Gittelman, and Ok-choon Park. 1994. A Review of the Literature on Part-task and Whole-task Training and Context Dependency (Report No. 1010). Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Torrence, Mark, and Gaynor C. Jeffery. 1999. The Cognitive Demands of Writing: Processing Capacity and Working Memory in Text Production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gog, Tamara, Fred Paas, and Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer. 2004. “Process-oriented Worked Examples: Improving Transfer Performance through Enhanced Understanding.” Instructional Science 32 (1–2): 83–98.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Merriënboer, Jeroen J. G. 1997. Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev Semyonovich. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
White. Barbara Y. and John Frederiksen. 1990. “Casual model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments.” Artificial Intelligence 421: 99–157.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, Grant P., and Jay McTighe. 1998. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Wightman, Dennis C., and Gavan Lintern. 1985. “Part-task Training for Tracking and Manual Control.” Human Factors 27 (3): 267–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, David, Jerome Bruner, and Gail Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem-Solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 171: 89–100.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaro, Juan Jesús, and Michael Truman. 1999. Manual de traducción: textos traducidos y comentados (inglés-español)—A Manual of Translation: Translated Texts with Annotations (Spanish-English). Alcobendas (Madrid): SGEL (Sociedad General Española de Librería).Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Li, Xiangdong
2019. Material development principles in undergraduate translator and interpreter training: balancing between professional realism and classroom realism. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 13:1 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.