Variation in psychopathological terminology
A case study on Body Dysmorphic Disorder
Representing specialized knowledge in the medical domain implies considering the dynamism of scientific and
technological progress. The advancement of knowledge on diseases goes hand in hand with the reconceptualization processes
undertaken by experts with consequent conceptual evolutions and possible variations of the terms used to designate medical
concepts. Sometimes term variation is the result of a desire to avoid or overcome negative connotations anchored in medical terms,
and leads to the creation of less evaluatively charged terms that carry a diminished ideological load.
This study illustrates the case of Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), a relatively under-/misdiagnosed medical
condition which has been the object of multiple reconceptualizations by experts. We focus on the analysis of the conceptual
evolution of BDD and the consequent variation occurring at the linguistic level. We adopt the theoretical assumption that
terminology has a double dimension – conceptual and linguistic. Following on this assumption, the terminologist must examine both
the experts’ conceptualizations of a given domain and the discourses produced by them in order to effectively represent the
specialized knowledge of a specific subject field. To complete the analysis, we present how information about BDD is disseminated
to non-experts through the analysis of a corpus of mass-media articles.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1The conceptual dimension of variation
- 2.2The linguistic dimension of variation
- 2.3Connotation in medical terminology
- 3.Conceptual evolution and linguistic variation of Body Dysmorphic Disorder
- 3.1Theoretical background and definition of the object of analysis
- 3.2The case of Body Dysmorphic Disorder
- 3.2.1<Dysmorphophobia>
- 3.2.2<Body dysmorphic disorder>
- 4.Dissemination of BDD
- 5.Conclusions and perspectives
- Notes
-
References