Cover not available
Part of
The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters
Edited by Villy Tsakona and Jan Chovanec
[Topics in Humor Research 7] 2018
► pp. 29–56

Chapter 2
Reactions to jab lines in conversational storytelling

| University of Patras
| University of Patras
The aim of this paper is to explore the multiple ways interlocutors negotiate humor in a conversational narrative. In particular, we examine the methodic strategies story recipients employ to respond to jab lines, namely humorous parts of the story that include a script opposition (Attardo, 2001a). Drawing on conversation analytic methods, we argue that story participants “do” humor via (a) immediate jab line responses, i.e. responses which immediately follow the presentation of the humorous events and display mutual understanding such as laughter, wordplay and evaluative comments of support; and (b) postponed jab line responses, where story recipients first elaborate on the unexpected narrated events through understanding checks or demonstrations of ritualized disbelief, and then express their (non)alignment.
Keywords: narrative, jab line, script opposition, laughter, incongruity, immediate jab line response, postponed jab line response
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Humor and response
    • 2.2Storytelling and response
    • 2.3Humor and storytelling
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1Reactions to jab lines framed as humorous by the storyteller
      • 4.1.1Immediate jab line responses
        • 4.1.1.1Laughter
        • 4.1.1.2Wordplay
        • 4.1.1.3Evaluative comments of support
      • 4.1.2Postponed jab line responses
        • 4.1.2.1Preferred postponed jab line reactions
        • 4.1.2.2Dispreferred postponed jab line reactions
    • 4.2Jab lines framed as humorous by story recipients
      • 4.2.1Immediate jab line responses
      • 4.2.2Postponed jab line reactions
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 5 January 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.02kar
References (43)
References
Archakis, Argiris, Giakoumelou, Maria, Papazachariou, Dimitris & Tsakona, Villy. (2010). The prosodic framing of humor in conversational narratives: Evidence from Greek data. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10(2), 187–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archakis, Argiris & Tsakona, Villy. (2005). Analyzing conversational data in GTVH Terms: A new approach to the issue of identity construction via humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18(1), 41–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Script oppositions and humorous targets: Promoting values and constructing identities via humor in Greek conversational data. Stylistyka, 15, 119–134.Google Scholar
. (2012). The narrative construction of identities in critical education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2001a). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001b). Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In Luigi Anolli, Rita Ciceri & Guiseppe Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 166–185). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. (2013). Agency in response: The role of prefatory address terms. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 290–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna. (2003). Identity in narrative: A study of immigrant discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna & Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. (2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. (1997). Narrative performances: A study of Modern Greek storytelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Phillip. (2003). Laughter in interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. (1986). Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text, 6(3), 283–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. (2001). The pragmatics of humor support. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(1), 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. (1984). A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Maxwell J. Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humor functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2), 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian & Wooffitt, Robin. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In George Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Karachaliou, Rania. (2015). Προσφωνήσεις ως πραγματολογικοί δείκτες σε συνομιλιακές αφηγήσεις: Η περίπτωση του ‘ρε’ και των συνδυασμών του [Address terms as pragmatic markers in conversational narratives: The case of the Greek marker ‘re’ and its combinations]. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Patras. [URL] [in Greek]
Karachaliou, Rania & Archakis, Argiris. (2014). Surprise in teenage storytelling: The case of the Greek marker re . In Maria Christodoulidou (Ed.), Analyzing Greek talk-in-interaction (pp. 10–35). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1387–1411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony. (2007). An introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lytra, Vally. (2007). Teasing in contact encounters: Frames, participant positions and responses. Multilingua, 26(4), 381–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morreall, John. (1983). Taking laughter seriously. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neil R. (2004). Humor, tellability, and conarration in conversational storytelling. Text, 24(1), 79–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neil R. & Chiaro, Delia. (2009). Talk and interaction. In Neil R. Norrick & Delia Chiaro (Eds), Talk in interaction (pp. ix–xvii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor & Capps, Lisa. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Maxwell, J. Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rendle-Short, Johanna. (2007). “Catherine, you’re wasting your time”: Address terms within the Australian political interview. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9), 1503–1525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In Richard Bauman & Joel Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
. (1992). Lectures on conversation (ed. Gail Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Sacks, Harvey. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnurr, Stephanie & Chan, Angela. (2011). When laughter is not enough. Responding to teasing and self-denigrating humor to work. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. (2004). Το χιούμορ στον γραπτό αφηγηματικό λόγο: Γλωσσολογική προσέγγιση [Humor in written narratives: A linguistic approach]. PhD thesis, University of Athens. [URL]. [in Greek]
Vergis, Nikos & Terkourafi, Marina. (2015). The M-word: A Greek collocation between solidarity and insult. In Marina Terkourafi (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness (pp. 41–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue & Kitzinger, Celia. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–182.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2020. Soziolinguistische Bibliographie europäischer Länder für 2018Sociolinguistic Bibliography of European Countries for 2018Bibliographie sociolinguistique des pays européens pour 2018. Sociolinguistica 34:1 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.