Cover not available
Part of
Semantics in Language Acquisition
Edited by Kristen Syrett and Sudha Arunachalam
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 24] 2018
► pp. 1–18

Chapter 1
The historical emergence and current study of semantics in acquisition

 | Rutgers University
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.24.01syr
References (85)
References
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Compositionality and statistics in adjective acquisition: 4-year-olds interpret tall and short based on the size distributions of novel noun referents. Child Development, 79, 594–608.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barwise, J., & Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159–219.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. (1982). Control and complementation. In Joan Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 282–390). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1978). The acquisition of word meaning: An investigation into some current conflicts. In N. Waterson & C. Snow (Eds.), The development of communication (pp. 263–287). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
(1980). The structure and origin of semantic categories in the language learning child. In M. L. Foster & S. H. Brandes (Eds.), Symbol as sense (pp. 277–299). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., & Braine, M. D. S. (1996). What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? Cognition, 60, 235–268.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D. S., Jia, G., & Dias, M. da Graca. (2001). Early representations for all, each, and their counterparts in Mandarin Chinese and Portuguese. In S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 316–339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1993). Meaning and grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects on the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1980). Rules and representations. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V., & Amaral, P. (2010). Children build on pragmatic information in language acquisition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 445–457.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., & McKee, C. (1986). The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In S. Berman, J-W. Choe, & J. McDonough (Eds.), Proceedings of 16th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 94–111). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Meroni, L., & Minai, U. (2004). If everybody knows, then every child knows. In J. van Kampen & S. Baauw (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 3 (pp. 127–138). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to research on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo-Martin, D., & Woodams, E. (1996). Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5, 83–153.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drozd, K. F. (2001). Children’s weak interpretations of universally quantified questions. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 340–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, N. H., Sinha, C. G., & Stedmon, J. A. (1982). All the cars–which cars? From word meaning to discourse meaning to discourse analysis. In M. Beveridge (Ed.), Children thinking through language (pp. 52–74). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). Logic, language, and meaning, Vol. I: Introduction to logic, Vol. II: Intensional logic and logical grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1978). On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development, 49, 988–998.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development, Vol. 2: Language, thought, and culture (pp. 301–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., & Landau, B. (1994). Acquisition of the lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Cognitive theory of language and culture series. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goro, T., & Akiba, S. (2004). The acquisition of acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese. In V. Chand, A. Kelleher, A. J. Rodríguez, & B. Schmeiser (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) (pp. 251–264). Summerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol.3. New York, NY: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice (1989) (pp. 22–40).Google Scholar
(1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (1981). Form, function, and the language acquisition device. In C. L. Baker & J. J. McCarthy (Eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 183–210). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gualmini, A.. (2003). The ups and downs of child language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Gualmini, A., & Crain, S. (2005a). Operator conditioning. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), BUCLD 28: Proceedings of the 28th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 232–243). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2005b). The structure of children’s linguistic knowledge. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 463–474.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gualmini, A., & Schwarz, B. (2009). Solving learnability problems in the acquisition of semantics. Journal of Semantics, 26, 185–215.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English (Doctoral dissertation). UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club (1976). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
(1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Implicature. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York, NY: Basic Books.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1964). The early growth of logic in the child: Classification and seriation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Mme. Tussaud meets the binding theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 1–31.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H., & Partee, B. (1995). Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition, 57, 129–191.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kartunnen, L. (1974). Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 169–193.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L., & Peters, S. (1979). Conventional implicature. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 11: Presupposition (pp. 1–56). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Katsos, N., & Bishop, D. (2011). Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature. Cognition, 120, 67–81).DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, W. (1979). Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin. Republished in (1980) in the series Outstanding dissertations in linguistics. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 339–359.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1690/1894). An essay concerning human understanding. Ed. by A. Campbell Fraser, 2 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lidz, J. (2001). Condition R. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 123–140.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lidz, J., & Musolino, J. (2002). Children’s command of quantification. Cognition, 84, 113–154.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, Robert. 1977. The grammar of quantification. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Cambridge: MA.Google Scholar
May, R. (1985). Logical form. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDaniel, D., McKee, C., & Smith Cairns, H. (1996). Methods for assessing children’s syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Montague, R. (1973). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Approaches to natural language (pp. 221–242). Dordrecht: Reidel.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1974). Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague. Ed. by R. H. Thomason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Musolino, J. (1998). Universal Grammar and the acquisition of semantic knowledge: An experimental investigation into the acquisition of quantifier-negation interaction in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
Noveck, I. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165–188.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86, 253–282.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, B. (1995). Lexical semantics and compositionality. In L. Gleitman, M. Liberman, & D. Osherson (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science, Part I: Language (pp. 311–360). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Montague, Richard (1930–1971). In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 255–257). Oxford: Elsevier.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philip, W. (1995). Event quantification in the acquisition of universal quantification (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1994a). How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics? Lingua, 92, 377–410.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994b). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 47–88.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 501–557.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for speaking. In The proceedings of the thirteenth annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 435–445). Available at: <[URL]>
(1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. L. (1980). Quantifiers and question answering in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 191–205.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In R. Stalnaker (Ed.), Context and content (pp. 47–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Syrett, K. (2007). Learning about the structure of scales: Adverbial modification and the acquisition of the semantics of gradable adjectives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Syrett, K., Kennedy, C., & Lidz, J. (2010). Meaning and context in children’s understanding of gradable adjectives. Journal of Semantics, 27, 1–35.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. (1980). Predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 203–238.Google Scholar