Article published In:
Translation Spaces: Online-First Articles

Do machines and humans translate in the same sense?

ORCID logo | York University
Human and machine translation share several features, one of which is actions that are not motivated by meaning. In addition, the human process often consists initially in the semi-conscious production of literal translations that are only weakly motivated by meaning. A definition of the translation process is proposed, based on these features. Since key words in the definition are ‘matter’ and ‘meaning’, I suggest a speculative view of how matter and meaning are connected in the mind. I tentatively conclude that the answer to the title question is yes. The argument is bolstered by textual examples of both human and machine translation.
Keywords: translation concept, human translation, machine translation, matter, meaning
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Four features common to human and machine translation
  • 3.Human translators’ actions unmotivated by meaning
  • 4.Weak motivation by meaning
  • 5.The proposed concept
  • 6.Matter
  • 7.How matter relates to meaning (and Why this Matters)
  • 8.So is machine translation translation?
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 September 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.23016.mos
References (30)
References
Asscher, Omri. 2023. “The position of machine translation in translation studies: A definitional perspective.” Translation Spaces 12 (1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baggio, Giosuè. 2022. Neurolinguistics. Boston: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bally, Charles. [1925] 1965. Le langage et la vie [Language and life], 3rd ed. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Belcher, Wendy. 2019. Writing your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. [1999] 2001. “What is a Relevant Translation?” Critical Inquiry 27 (2): 174–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Do Carmo, Félix, and Joss Moorkens. 2023. “Translation’s New High-tech Clothes.” In The Human Translator in the 2020s, edited by Gary Massey, Elsa Huertas-Barros, and David Katan, 44–59. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2003. Mouse or Rat? London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Folkart, Barbara. 2007. Second Finding. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Ryan. 2020. “The Copy Effect in Translation: On Formal Similarity and the Book Historic Perspective.” TTR 33 (2): 13–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hadley, James Luke, Kristiina Taivalkoski-Shilov, Carlos S. C. Teixeira, and Antonio Toral (eds). 2023. Using Technologies for Creative-text Translation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halverson, Sandra. 2019. “‘Default’ translation: A construct for cognitive translation and interpreting studies.” Translation, Cognition & Behavior 2 (2): 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jääskeläinen, Riita. 2017. “Verbal reports.” In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition edited by John W. Schwieter and Aline Ferreira, 213–231. Hoboken NJ: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kade, Otto. 1968. Zufall und Gesetzmässigkeit in der Übersetzung [Coincidence and regularity in translation]. Verlag Enzyklopädie: Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kleist, Heinrich von. [1805] 2004. “On the Gradual Production of Thoughts whilst Speaking.” In Kleist: Selected Writings, translated by David Constantine, 405–409. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Littau, Karin. 2016. “Translation and the Materialities of Communication.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 82–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ljudskanov, Alexandre. [1967] 1969. Traduction humaine et traduction mécanique [Human translation and mechanical translation]. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Lupo, Lorenzo. 2023. Challenges and Remedies for Context-Aware Neural Machine Translation. PhD Thesis. Université Grenoble-Alpes. Accessed February 26, 2024. [URL]
Mossop, Brian. 2006. “Has Computerization Changed Translation?” Meta 51 (4): 787–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “When Translation is not about Meaning.” Babel 63 (5): 1–22.Google Scholar
Newmark, Peter. 1988. A Textbook of Translation. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Olohan, Maeve. 2021. Translation and Practice Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pérez-Ortiz, Juan Antonio, Mikel L. Forcada and Felipe Sánchez-Martínez. 2022. “How Neural Machine Translation Works.” In Machine Translation for Everyone: empowering users in the age of artificial intelligence, edited by Dorothy Kenny, 141–164. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Pitman, Jeff. 2021. “Google Translate: One billion installs, one billion stories”. The Keyword. Google Blog. Accessed February 26, 2024. [URL]
Pym, Anthony. 1992. Translation and Text Transfer. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna and Regina Rogl. 2022. “Praxis and Process Meet Halfway: The Convergence of Sociological and Cognitive Approaches in Translation Studies.” Translation and Interpreting 14 (2): 32–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozmysłowicz, Tomasz. 2014. “Machine Translation: A Problem for Translation Theory.” New Voices in Translation Studies 111: 145–163.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. [1916] 1959. Course in General Linguistics translated by Wade Baskin. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja. 2005. “The Monitor Model Revisited: Evidence from Process Research.” Meta 50 (2): 405–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turovsky, Barak. 2016. “Ten years of Google Translate”. The Keyword. Google Blog. Accessed February 26, 2024. [URL]