Cover not available
Part of
Ugandan English: Its sociolinguistics, structure and uses in a globalising post-protectorate
Edited by Christiane Meierkord, Bebwa Isingoma and Saudah Namyalo
[Varieties of English Around the World G59] 2016
► pp. 121–148

Diphthongs in Ugandan English

Evidence for and against variety status and Interactions across Englishes

This chapter examines whether Luganda influence on Ugandan English can be confirmed at the level of phonology or whether Ugandan English is the result of Interactions across ethnic Englishes in the sense of Meierkord (2012). It presents the results of spectrographic analyses of the lexical sets face, goat, price, choice, and mouth, focusing on fifteen speakers who have Acholi-Lango, Luganda and Runyankore-Rukiga as their first languages. These languages differ as regards their vowel systems, particularly as regards their tolerance of diphthongs. The results will be discussed with reference to Uganda’s present-day sociolinguistic realities, to assess whether ethnic varieties of English exist and whether Ugandan English is a homogeneous variety primarily influenced by Luganda or the result of Interactions across Englishes.
Keywords: diphthongs in Ugandan English, interactions across Englishes, substrate influence of Acholi-Lango, Luganda and Runyankore-Rukika
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g59.06mei
References (48)
References
Adank, P., Smits, R. & van Hout, R. 2004. A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(5): 3099–3107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, T. 1989. The Pari vowel system with an internal reconstruction of its historical development. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 11: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). Vowel quality alternation in Mabaan and its Western Nilotic history. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 20: 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ball, M.J. 1994. The centring diphthongs in Southern English – A sound change in progress. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 14(1): 38–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ball, M.J. & Müller, N. 2011. Phonetics for Communication Disorders. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. 2016. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer programme]. Version 6.0.13. <[URL]> (3 January 2016).
Cruttenden, A. 2001. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English, 6th edn. Oxford: Arnold.Google Scholar
Deterding, D. 2000. Measurements of the /eɪ/ and /ǝʊ/ vowels of young English speakers in Singapore. In The English Language in Singapore: Research on Pronunciation, A. Brown, D. Deterding & E.L. Low (eds), 93–99. Singapore: Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Deterding, D., Wong, J. & Kirkpatrick, A. 2008. The pronunciation of Hong Kong English. English World-Wide 29(2): 148–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donegan, P. 2013. Normal vowel development. In Handbook of Vowels and Vowel Disorders, M.J. Ball & F.E. Gibbon (eds), 24–60. New York NY: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fisher, A.E.C. 2000. Assessing the state of Ugandan English. English Today 16(1): 57–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gimson, A.C. 1962. An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Golston, C. 2006. Diphthongs. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd edn. Vol. 3, Keith Brown (ed), 601–603. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. 2009. Introduction to English Phonetics and Phonology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T. 2011. The Black Kenyan English vowel system. An acoustic phonetic analysis. English World-Wide 32(2): 147–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isingoma, B. 2014. Lexical and grammatical features of Ugandan English. English Today 30(2): 51–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. 1918. An Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P., Togersen, E.N. & Fox, S. 2008. Reversing “drift”: Innovation and diffusion in the London diphthong system. Language Variation and Change 20(3): 451–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P., Glick, R. & Criper, C. 1972. Language in Uganda. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Laver, J. 1994. Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M.P., Simons, G.F. & Fennig, C.D. (eds). 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 18th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Low, E.-L. 2015. Pronunciation for English as an International Language. From Research to Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lindau, M., Norlin, K. & Svantesson, J.-O. 1990. Some cross-linguistic differences in diphthongs. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 20(1): 10–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I. 1984. Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, O. & Fletcher, J. 2010. The acoustic characteristics of diphthongs in Indian English. World Englishes 29(1): 27–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meierkord, C. 2012. Interactions Across Englishes. Linguistic Choices in Local and International Contact Situations. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, R. 1992. English in Language Shift. The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Synopsis: The phonology of English in Africa and South and Southeast Asia. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, E.W. Schneider, K. Burridge, B. Kortmann, R. Mesthrie & C. Upton (eds), 1099–1109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morreira, K. 2012. Social Change, Class Formation and English: A Study of Young Black South Africans with “Model C” School Backgrounds. PhD dissertation, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge. CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. 2015. The circle of English: An exploration of the ‘core’ and ‘periphery’ of world Englishes. In The Variability of Current World Englishes, E. Green & C.F. Meyer (eds), 99–119. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Papakyritsis, I. & Granese, A. 2013. Cross-linguistic study of vowel systems. In Handbook of Vowels and Vowel Disorders, M.J. Ball & F.E. Gibbon (eds), 186–206. New York NY: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peace Corps Language Archive. no date. Acholi language manual. <[URL]> (18 March 2016).
Sapir, E. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York NY: Harcourt Brace & World.Google Scholar
Schlüter, J. 2012. Early Modern English: Phonology. In Historical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook. [HSK 34.1.], A. Bergs & L. Brinton (eds), 589–604. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schmied, J. 1991. National and subnational features in Kenyan English. In English Around the World: Sociolinguistics Perspectives, J. Cheshire (ed), 420–432. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. East African English (Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania): Phonology. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, E.W. Schneider, K. Burridge, B. Kortmann, R. Mesthrie & C. Upton (eds), 918–930. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2012. Standards of English in East Africa. In Standards of English: Codified Varieties Around the World, R. Hickey (ed), 229–255. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds) 2004. Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. 2004. Global synopsis: Phonetic and phonological variation in English world-wide. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, E.W. Schneider, K. Burridge, B. Kortmann, R. Mesthrie & C. Upton (eds), 1111–1137. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J. 2010. Second Dialect Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Dunn, J. 1985. Normal and Disordered Phonology in Children. Baltimore MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, E.R. 2011. Sociophonetics: An Introduction. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thomas, E.R. & Kendall, T. 2007~2014. NORM’s vowel normalization methods (v.1.1). University of Oregon, LVC Lab. <[URL]> (16 February 2016).
van Rooy, B. & van Huyssteen, G.B. 2000. The vowels of Black South African English: Current knowledge and future prospects. South African Journal of Linguistics, Supplement 38: 35–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, B. 2004. Black South African English: Phonology. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, E.W. Schneider, K. Burridge, B. Kortmann, R. Mesthrie & C. Upton (eds), 943–952. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wells, J.C. 1982a. Accents of English, 1: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1982b. Accents of English, 3: Beyond the British Isles. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Adokorach, Monica & Bebwa Isingoma
2022. Homogeneity and heterogeneity in the pronunciation of English among Ugandans. English Today 38:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Adokorach, Monica & Bebwa Isingoma
2023. Homogeneity and heterogeneity in lexical stress placement among Ugandan speakers of English as an L2: a view from usage-based perspective. ExELL 11:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Meierkord, Christiane & Bebwa Isingoma
2022. Between first language influence, exonormative orientation and migration. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 43:2 ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Isingoma, Bebwa & Christiane Meierkord
2019. Capturing the lexicon of Ugandan English. In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 88], ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Isingoma, Bebwa & Christiane Meierkord
2022. Between exonormative traditions and local acceptance: A corpus-linguistic study of modals of obligation and spatial prepositions in spoken Ugandan English. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.