Article published In:
Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 23:1 (2020) ► pp.92108
References
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G.
(1974) Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 81, 47–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, A. C.
(2010) Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118–1133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornish, E. R.
(1971) Pragmatic aspects of negation in sentence evaluation and completion tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 505–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornish, E. R., & Wason, P. C.
(1970) The recall of affirmative and negative sentences in an incidental learning task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22(2), 109–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A.
(1980) Individual difference in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 191, 450–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M.
(1996) Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31, 422–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dale, R., & Duran, N.
(2011) The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification. Cognitive Science, 351, 983–996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beni, R., Borella, E., & Carretti, B.
(2007) Reading comprehension in aging: The role of working memory and metacomprehension. Aging, Neuropsychology, And Cognition, 14(2), 189–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R.
(2007) Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W.
(2002) Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 111, 19–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flesch, R.
(1951) How to test readability. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K., & Alkabets-Zlozover, I.
(2007) Negation in context: A functional approach to suppression. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gough, P. B.
(1965) Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 4(2), 107–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T.
(1988) Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 221, pp. 193–225). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hoosain, R.
(1973) The processing of negation. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12(6), 618–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karpicke, J. D.
(2009) Metacognitive control and strategy selection: Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 469–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Tridgell, J. M.
(1972) When negation is easier than affirmation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 241, 87–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A.
(1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaup, B.
(2001) Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 960–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaup, B., & Zwaan, R. A.
(2003) Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 291, 439–446.Google Scholar
Kaup, B.¸., Lüdtke, J., Zwaan, R. A.
(2006) Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1033–1050. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaup, B., Zwaan, R. A., & Lüdtke, J.
(2007) The experiential view of language comprehension: How is negation represented?. In F. Schmalhofer, C. A. Perfetti, F. Schmalhofer, C. A. Perfetti (Eds.) Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 255–288). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W.
(1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Littrell-Baez, M. K., Friend, A., Caccamise, D., & Okochi, C.
(2015) Using Retrieval Practice and Metacognitive Skills to Improve Content Learning. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(8), 682–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdtke, J., & Kaup, B.
(2006) Context effects when reading negative and affirmative sentences. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1735–1740).Google Scholar
Maki, R. H., Shields, M., Wheeler, A. E., & Zacchilli, T. L.
(2005) Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 723–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolin, S. J., & Abrams, L.
(2009)  Not may not be too difficult: The effects of negation on older adults’ sentence comprehension. Educational Gerontology, 351, 308–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolin, S. J., & Hover, P. A.
(2011) Metacomprehension and negation: Assessing readers’ awareness of the difficulty of negated text. Reading Psychology, 321, 158–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolin, S. J.
(2013) Can bold typeface improve readers’ comprehension and metacomprehension of negation? Reading Psychology, 34(1), 85–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Older adults’ comprehension of transformational and deactivation negation. Educational Gerontology, 41(8), 604–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolin, S. J., & Snyder, N.
(2018) It may not be that difficult the second time around: The effects of rereading on the comprehension and metacomprehension of negated text. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 392–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. D., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Redick, T. S., Bunting, M., & Engle, R. W.
(2019) The role of maintenance and disengagement in predicting reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Einstein, G. O.
(2009) The read-recite-review study strategy: Effective and portable. Psychological Science (0956–7976), 20(4), 516–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Just, M. A.
(1989) Changes in activation levels with negation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(4), 633–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehler, J.
(1963) Some effects of grammatical transformation on the recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 2(4), 346–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, M., & Kuperberg, G.
(2008) When the truth is not too hard to handle. Psychological Science, 191, 1213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordmeyer, A. E. and Frank, M. C.
(2014) A pragmatic account of the processing of negative sentences. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Orenes, I., Moxey, L., Scheepers, C., & Santamaría, C.
(2016) Negation in context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(6), 1082–1092. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pettijohn, K. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(2016) Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation. Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 1064–1075. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D.
(2006) The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherman, M. A.
(1973) Bound to be easier? The negative prefix and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 121, 76–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thiede, K. W., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D.
(2011) Test expectancy affects metacomprehension accuracy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 264–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tian, Y., & Breheny, R.
(2015) Dynamic Pragmatic View of Negation Processing. Negation and Polarity: Experimental Perspectives, 21–43.Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W.
(1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 281, 127–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A.
(1987) Episodic models in discourse processing. In R. Horowitz, S. J. Samuels, R. Horowitz, S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 161–196). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D.
(2001) Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 16(1), 128–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. A.
(1990) Constraining factors in calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 214–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. A., & Bryant, D. S.
(1995) Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 12–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar