Metonymy

Klaus-Uwe PantherGünter Radden

Table of contents

Metonymy (Greek µετονυµία ‘change of name’) is one of the major figures of speech recognized in classical rhetoric. One of the earliest definitions of metonymy is attributed to the treatise Rhetorica ad Herennium (see Koch 1999: 140). The anonymous author characterizes metonymy as “a trope that takes its expression from near and close things [‘ab rebus propinquis et finitimis’] by which we can comprehend a word that is not denominated by its proper word” (translation by Koch 1999: 141). This ancient characterization already points to the notions of contiguity and substitution, which have ever since been criterial in distinguishing metonymy from metaphor.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Barcelona, A.
2000On the plausibility of claiming metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective: 22–58. Mouton de Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blank, A.
1999Co-presence and succession. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 169–191. Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M. & R. Brdar-Szab
2003Metonymic coding of linguistic action: A cross-linguistic study. In K.-U. Panther & L.L. Thornburg (eds.) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing: 241–266. Benjamins>. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
1993The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 335–370. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. Jr.
1994The poetics of mind: Figurative thought language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.
1999Speaking and thinking with metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 61–76. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. H
1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & E.C. Traugott
1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Koch, P.
1999Frame and contiguity: On the cognitive bases of metonymy and certain types of word formation. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 139–167. Benjamins. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
1980Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1999Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Turner
1989More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. The Chicago University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
1993Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1–38. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, K.
1999Nominalizations metonymy, and lexicographic practice. In L.G. Stadler & C. Eyrich (eds.) Issues in cognitive linguistics: 141–163. Mouton de Gruyter.  MetBib DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N.R.
1981Semiotic principles in semantic theory. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U.
2001Syntactic control. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (eds.) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences: 15397–15401. Elsevier Science. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U. & L.L. Thornburg
1998A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 755–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 333–357. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000The effect for cause metonymy in English grammar. In A. Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective: 215–231. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
2003aIntroduction: On the nature of conceptual metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & L.L. Thornburg (eds.) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing: 1–20. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003bMetonymy and lexical aspect in English and French. Jezikoslovlje 4(1): 71–101. Google Scholar
Papafragou, A.
1996Figurative language and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. Language and Literature 5(1): 179–193. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, J.
1993Type coercion and lexical selection. In J. Pustejovsky (ed.) Semantics and the Lexicon: 73–96. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
2000How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective: 93–108. Mouton de Gruyter.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
2004The folk model of language. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & A. Kwiatkowska (eds.) Imagery in language: Festschrift in honour of Professor Ronald W. Langacker: 543–565. Peter Lang. Google Scholar
Radden, G. & Z. Kövecses
1999Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 17–59. Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ruiz De Mendoza, F.
2000The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective: 109–132. Mouton de Gruyter.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.
1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1975Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts: 59–82. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Song, N.S.
1998Metaphor and metonymy. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds.) Relevance Theory: Applications and implications: 87–104. Benjamins. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Thornburg, L. & K.-U. Panther
1997Speech act metonymies. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. Waugh (eds.) Discourse and perspectives in cognitive linguistics: 205–219. Benjamins. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C. & E. König
1991The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.) Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: 189–218. Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, S.
1962Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. Blackwell. Google Scholar