Perception and language

Roger Lindsay
Table of contents

In the following essay, empirical investigations and theoretical treatments of the relationship between perception and language are reviewed from a broadly cognitive science perspective. The first part of the review examines the idea that the content of perceptual experience can be shaped or modified by substantive features of language such as the characteristics of the lexicon. It is concluded that although linguistic modification of perception is theoretically possible, and readily compatible with several current theories of perceptual representation, the data suggest that such modification occurs only in marginal cases. Recent studies favour the view that language is most likely to influence cognition in the absence of perceptual constraints. The second part of the review considers the structural relationship between language and perception within a framework for cognition largely based on neuropsychological evidence. From this viewpoint it seems likely that much perceptual information never makes contact with the mechanisms underlying language processing or conscious awareness. Even some aspects of language use are apparently influenced by perceptual information that is not available for articulation.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Allott, R.
1973 The Physical Foundations of Language. ELB.Google Scholar
1981 Structural interrelationship of language and the processes underlying visual perception and action. Paper for Symposium on Glossogenetics. Unesco.
Allport, A., B. Antonis & P. Reynolds
1972 On the division of attention: a disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 24: 225–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baizer, J.S., L.G. Ungerleider & R. Desimone
1991 Organisation of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in Macaques. Journal of Neuroscience 11: 187–194.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A.D.
1990 Human Memory. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ballard, D., M. Hayhoe, P. Pook & P. Rao
1997 Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 723–67.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, R., M. Ghoneim, S. Sum Ping & M. Ali
1991 Human learning during general anaesthetics and surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 66: 170–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.W.
1999 Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577–660.Google Scholar
Berlin, B. & P. Kay
1969 Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. University of California Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L.
2001 Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43: 1–22. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Boussaoud, D., G. Di Pellegrino & S.P. Wise
1996 Frontal lobe mechanisms subserving vision-for-action-versus vision-for-perception. Behavioural Brain Research 72: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M.
1996 The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: cognitive versus linguistic determinism. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.) Rethinking linguistic relativity: 145–76. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brent, P.J., C. Kennard & K.H. Ruddock
1994 Residual colour vision in a human Hemianope: spectral responses and colour discrimination. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 266: 219–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & E.H. Lenneberg
1954 A study in language and cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49: 454–462. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J.S., J.J. Goodnow & G.A. Austin
1956 A study of thinking. Wiley.Google Scholar
Carmichael, L., H. Hogan & A. Walter
1932 An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually presented forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology 15: 73–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidoff, J., I. Davies & D. Roberson
1999a Colour categories in a stone-age tribe. Nature 398: 203–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999b Colour categories in a stone-age tribe. Nature 402: 604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.
1983 The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Geiger, L.
1880 Contributions to the History of the Development of the Human Race. Tubner & Company.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. & L. Boroditsky
2001 Individuation, relational relativity, and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (eds.) Language acquisition and conceptual development: 215–256. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. & M. Imai
1997 A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition 62(2): 169–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gladstone, W.E.
1858 Studies on Homer and the Homeric Age. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harley, T.
2001 The Psychology of Language. The Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Heider, E.R.
1972 Universals in colour naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93: 10–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickerson, N.P.
1971 Review of Basic Colour Terms . International Journal of American Linguistics 37: 265–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, E. & F. Agnoli
1991 The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review 98: 377–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantz, D. & V. Stefflre
1964 Language and cognition revisited. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 69: 472–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E.H.
1967 Biological foundations of language. Wiley.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.
1996 Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In P. Bloom & M. Peterson (eds.) Language and space: 109–169. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Livingstone, M. & D. Hubel
1988 Segregation of form, colour, movement and depth: anatomy, physiology and perception. Science 240: 740–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J.
1992 Grammatical categories and cognition: a case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J. & R. Shweder
1979 Whorf and his critics: Linguistic and nonlinguistic influences on color memory. American Anthropologist 81: 581–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnus, H.
1880 Die geschichtliche Entwickelung des Farbensinnes der Nâturvölker. Fraher. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcel, A.J.
1998 Blindsight and shape perception: deficits of visual consciousness or visual function? Brain 121: 1565–1588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcel, A.J. & E. Bisiach
(eds.) 1998 Consciousness in contemporary science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markman, E. & J. Hutchinson
1984 Children’s sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology 16: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merigan, W.H. & J.H. Maunsell
1983 How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience 16: 369–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaels, D.
1977 Linguistic relativity and color terminology. Language and Speech 20: 333–343.Google Scholar
Mishkin, M., L. Ungerleider & K. Macko
1983 Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences 6: 414–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. & T. Shallice
1986 Attention to Action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (eds.) Consciousness and Self-regulation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 4: 1–18. Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’regan, J.K. & A. Noë
2001 A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5): 939–1031. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pashler, H.
1992 Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at the same time. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1: 44–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z.W.
1999 Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 341–423.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisberg, D.
2001 Cognition. W. W. Norton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Santa, J.L. & H.B. Ranken
1972 Effects of verbal coding on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93: 268–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sera, M., C. Berge & J. Del Castillo
1994 Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development 9(3): 261–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schyns, P.G., R.L. Goldstone & J.-P. Thibaut
1998 The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 1–54.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, R. & W. Schneider
1984 Automatic and controlled processes revisited. Psychological Review 91: 269–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simons, D.J.
2000 Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science 4: 147–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.
1996 From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.) Rethinking linguistic relativity: 70–96. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Squire, L.R.
1994 Declarative and Non-declarative memory: multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In D.I. Schacter & E. Tulving (eds.) Memory Systems 1994: 210–246. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stoffregen, T.A. & B.G. Bardy
2001 On specification and the senses. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 24: 195–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toates, F.M.
1975 Control Theory in Biology and Experimental Psychology. Hutchinson Educational.Google Scholar
Waxman, S. & T. Kosowski
1990 Nouns mark category relations: Toddlers and pre-schoolers word-learning biases. Child Development 61: 1461–1473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiskrantz, L.
1986 Blindsight – A Case Study and Implications. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, L. & E.K. Warrington
1979 Consciousness lost and found. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar