Philosophy of mind

Stefaan E. Cuypers

Table of contents

In contradistinction to both classical, armchair philosophy of mind and a priori, ordinary language philosophy of mind, and in spite of some forceful attempts to reverse this trend (e.g. Searle 1992; Hasker 1999), contemporary philosophy of mind is largely naturalized. Whereas the older forms of philosophy of mind were based upon the methods of introspection and conceptual analysis, recent philosophy of mind draws heavily upon the empirical methods and objective findings of the sciences. The present link of philosophy of mind especially to psychology, neurophysiology, artificial intelligence and linguistics establishes its position among the other cognitive sciences. Adopting a general scientistic outlook and, in particular, the naturalistic ontology this entails, excludes spiritualistic dualism – of whatever kind – as a possible theory of the mind from the start. The only viable frame of research for an investigation of the mind compatible with a scientific and naturalistic worldview is materialistic monism or – to use the current term – physicalism (Gillett & Loewer 2001). It follows that most contemporary studies of the nature and typical aspects of the mind – consciousness and intentionality – are constrained by a minimal ontological commitment to the physical stuff of physics, chemistry and neurophysiology. It is this trend that I will focus on.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Armstrong, D.M.
1968A materialist theory of the mind. Routledge. Google Scholar
Block, N.
1978Troubles with functionalism. In N. Block (ed.) 1980.: 268–305. Google Scholar
1980What is functionalism? In N. Block (ed.) 1980: 171–184. Google Scholar
1986Advertisement for a semantics for psychology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10: 615678. Google Scholar
1995The mind as the software of the brain. In E.E. Smith & D.N. Osherson (eds.) Thinking. Second edition: 377–425. MIT Press. Google Scholar
(ed.) 1980Readings in philosophy of psychology, vol. 1. Methuen. Google Scholar
Carruthers, P.
2006The architecture of mind. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. & Smith, P.K.
(eds.) 1996Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R.
2002Thoughts and utterances. Blackwell. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Carston, R., S. Guttenplan & D. Wilson
(eds.) 2002Pragmatics and cognitive science. Special issue of Mind & Language 17: 1–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. & G. Powell
2006Relevance theory – New directions and developments. In E. Lepore & B.C. Smith (eds.) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of language: 341–360. Clarendon Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Churchland Smith, P.
1986Neurophilosophy. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Churchland, P.M.
1989A neurocomputational perspective. MIT Press. Google Scholar
2007Neurophilosophy at work. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuypers, S.E.
1995Dennett's mild realism in the philosophy of mind. In P. Cortois (ed.) The many problems of realism: 189–207. Tilburg University Press. Google Scholar
Dascal, M.
1983Pragmatics and the philosophy of mind. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D.
1984Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
Dennett, D.C.
1978Brainstorms. Bradford Books. Google Scholar
1987The intentional stance. MIT Press. Google Scholar
1990The myth of original intentionality. In K.A. Mohyeldin Said, W.H. Newton-Smith, R. Viale & K.V. Wilkes (eds.) Modelling the mind: 43–62. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
1991Consciousness explained. Little, Brown. Google Scholar
Dennett, D.C. & J.C. Haugeland
1987Intentionality. In R.L. Gregory (ed.) The Oxford companion to the mind: 383–386. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Dretske, F.I.
1981Knowledge and the flow of information. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Field, H.H.
1978Mental representations. In N. Block (ed.) 1981 Readings in philosophy of psychology, vol. 2: 78–114. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Fodor, J.A.
1975The language of thought. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
1981Representations. MIT Press. Google Scholar
1987Psychosemantics. MIT Press. Google Scholar
1990A theory of content and other essays. MIT Press. Google Scholar
1994The Elm and the expert. MIT Press. Google Scholar
2008LOT 2. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.A. & E. Lepore
1992Holism. Blackwell. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2002The compositionality papers. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Gillett, C. & B. Loewer
2001Physicalism and its discontents. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1975Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: 41–58. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1989Studies in the ways of words. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Harman, G.
1987(Nonsolipsistic). conceptual role semantics. In E. Lepore (ed.) New directions in semantics: 55–81. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Hasker, W.
1999The emergent self. Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Haugeland, J.C.
1985Artificial intelligence: the very idea. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Haugeland, J.C
1990The intentionality all-stars. In J.E. Tomberlin (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 4: 383–427. Ridgeview Publ. Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C.G.
(1949). [1935] The logical analysis of psychology. In C.G. Hempel 2000 Selected Philosophical Essays: 165–180. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Kasher, A.
(ed.) 1988Cognitive aspects of language use. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 12: 505–804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.
1993Supervenience and mind. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Mind in a physical world. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Lewis, D.
1966An argument for the identity theory. In D. Lewis 1983 Philosophical papers, vol. 1: 99107. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R.G.
1984Language, thought, and other biological categories. MIT Press. Google Scholar
1993White queen psychology and other essays for Alice. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Nagel, T.
1974What is it like to be a bat? In D.R. Hofstadter & D.C. Dennett (eds.) 1982 The mind's I: 391–403. Bantam Books. Google Scholar
Papineau, D.
1987Reality and representation. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Place, U.T.
1956Is consciousness a brain process? In C.V. Borst (ed.) 1970 The mind-brain identity theory: 42–51. Macmillan. Google Scholar
Putnam, H.
1967The nature of mental states. In H. Putnam 1975 Language and reality: 429–440. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
1983Realism and reason. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988Representation and reality. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O.
1960Word and object. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Récanati, F.
2004Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G.
1949The concept of mind. Hutchinson. Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S.
2007Physical realization. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabó, Z.G.
2006The distinction between semantics and pragmatics. In E. Lepore & B.C. Smith (eds.) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of language: 361–389. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
(ed.) 2005Semantics versus pragmatics. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.R.
1980Minds, brains, and programs. In D.R. Hofstadter & D.C. Dennett (eds.) 1982 The mind's I: 353–373. Bantam Books. Google Scholar
1983Intentionality. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992The rediscovery of the mind. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Smart, J.J.C.
1959Sensations and brain processes. In C.V. Borst (ed.) 1970 The mind-brain identity theory: 52–66. Macmillan. Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1995Relevance: communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Blackwell.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Taylor, K.
1998Truth and Meaning. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1953Philosophical investigations. Blackwell. Google Scholar