The social and organizational context of terminology work

Anja Drame
Table of contents

Terminology work does not take place in a vacuum, nor is it in any way meant as an art pour l'art. Usually, it serves a very clear purpose. If that was not the case, few organizations would invest in this expensive exercise. Those companies, public institutions or civil society bodies that invest in terminology work do so because they are aware of its ability to improve internal and external communication, institutional learning and performance. They are aware of the costs that can be saved or competitive edges that can be won by managing and using terminology professionally and adequately.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Budin, Gerhard
1990 The role of terminology planning in International science & technology planning policies. Vienna: InfoTerm.Google Scholar
Cobarrubias, Juan and Joshua A. Fishman
(editor) 1983 Progress in Language Planning. International Perspectives. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Robert L
1989 Language Planning and Social Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Corbeil, Jean-Claude
1980 L’aménagement linguistique du Québec. Montreal: Guérin.Google Scholar
Drame, Anja
2008 “Terminologieplanung ist weit mehr als Sprachplanung – und betrifft (fast) jeden.” eDITion Terminologiemagazin 1:5-9.Google Scholar
2009 “Terminology Policies and Communication for Social Change: Promoting Linguistic Diversity and Terminology in South Africa.” PhD diss., University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Epstein, Marc J
2008 Making Sustainability Work. Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Felber, Helmut
1986 Guidelines on national terminology planning policy in developing countries and countries with not developed terminology work. Vienna: Infoterm.Google Scholar
1990 Terminology planning – a strategic tool for terminology development, regulation and dissemination. Vienna: Infoterm.Google Scholar
Galinski, Christian, Gerhard Budin, and August D. de V. Cluver
1999. “Terminologieplanung und Sprachplanung.” In Fachsprachen/Languages for Special Purposes. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Fachsprachenforschung und Terminologiewissenschaft, edited by Lothar Hoffmann, Hartwig Kalverkämper and Herbert Ernst Wiegand, 2207-2215. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Infoterm
2005 Guidelines for Terminology Policies. Formulating and implementing terminology policy in language communities. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
ISO 29383
2010 Terminology Policies – Development and Implementation. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
Montviloff, Victor
1990 National Information Policies. A Handbook on the Formulation, approval, implementation and operation of a national policy on information, vol. 11, PGI 90, WS. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
Picht, Heribert
1999 “Terminography in regional organisations I: NORDTERM.” In Fachsprachen/Languages for Special Purposes. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Fachsprachenforschung und Terminologiewissenschaft, edited by Lothar Hoffmann, Hartwig Kalverkämper and Herbert Ernst Wiegand, 2144-2150. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M
2003 Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Joan and Björn H Jernudd
(editor) 1971 Can Language be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice for Developing Nations. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.  BoPGoogle Scholar