Constructing Korean and Japanese interculturality in talk: Ethnic membership categorization among users of Japanese

Erica Zimmerman

Abstract

This article investigates how participants accomplish interculturality (Nishizaka 1995, 1999; Mori 2003) when they engage in talk about Korean cultural practices involving labels and descriptions which construct one another’s national/ethnic identity. Within the framework of Membership Categorization Analysis (Sacks 1972, 1979, 1992), three segments of conversation were analyzed between Korean users of Japanese attending a Japanese university and their Japanese work colleagues or college friends. The analysis challenges key assumptions about intercultural conversation in several ways: 1) by demonstrating that interculturality is not always achieved in talk among speakers from different nations who have different first languages; 2) through illustrating how cultural expertise is often claimed by ‘non-members’ of the culture; and 3) by showing how presumed cultural experts do not always enact their cultural memberships, even in the face of cultural critique. The study reveals that the various membership categorizations that occur are contingent on how the participants respond to the assessment of various cultural practices. The findings of this study provide further awareness of how cross-cultural identity construction and interculturality are accomplished in talk.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe
(eds.) (1998) Identities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko M
(2006) Joint construction of folk beliefs by JFL learners and Japanese host families. In Margaret DuFon & Eton Churchill (eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 120-150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Day, Dennis
(1998) Being ascribed, and resisted, membership of an ethnic group. In Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 151-170.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J.M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225-246.Google Scholar
(1986) Audience, diversity, participation and interpretation. Text 6: 283-316.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987) Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly 50.2: 115-131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
(1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1.1: 1-54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J
(1982) Language and social identity (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
(1997) Culture in action. Washington, D.C: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Iino, Masakazu
(1996) Excellent Foreigner!": Gaijinization of Japanese language and culture in contact situations - An ethnographic study of dinner table conversations between Japanese host families and American students. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Mori, Junko
(2003) The construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American students. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36.2: 143-184. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nishizaka, Aug
(1995) The interactive constitution of interculturality: How to be a Japanese with words. Human Studies 18.2-3: 301-326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Doing interpreting within interaction: The interactive accomplishment of a “henna gaijin” or “strange foreigner.” Human Studies 22.2-4: 235-251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1972) An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In David Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press, pp. 31-74.Google Scholar
(1979) Hotrodder: A revolutionary new category. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp. 7-14.Google Scholar
(1992) Lectures on conversation, Vol. 1 & 2. In Gail Jefferson (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A
(1972) Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In P.P. Giglioli (ed.), Language and social context. New York: Penguin books, pp. 95-135.Google Scholar
ten Have, Paul
(1999) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar