Dual function of (inter)subjectivity in the use of well as a discourse marker
RyoTakamura
Rissho University
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that subjective elements emerge in the initial position of an utterance, known as the
left periphery, whereas intersubjective elements typically emerge in the final position, referred to as the right periphery.
However, this functional asymmetry is not invariably maintained. This study advances the argument that the discourse marker
well can serve a dual purpose, simultaneously expressing both a speaker’s subjectivity and intersubjectivity
at the outset of an utterance, specifically on the left periphery. Essentially, well indexes the speaker’s
subjectivity mediated through intersubjectivity. Additionally, the study explores the intricate relationship between
intersubjectivity and the textual function of well as a discourse marker. This study reveals that intersubjective
functions can contribute to the development of textual functions.
In recent years, there has been significant discussion of which linguistic items and functions emerge on the ‘periphery’ of
an utterance. The periphery comprises the utterance-initial (i.e., the left periphery) and utterance-final (i.e., the right periphery)
positions. Beeching and Detges (2014, 11) hypothesized a functional asymmetry between these
left and right peripheries, positing a distinct tendency for expressions in the left periphery to be subjective (self-addressed) and
those in the right periphery to be intersubjective (other-addressed). However, this one-to-one association between a speaker’s
(inter)subjective stance and position in the periphery has been challenged in various studies (e.g., Degand and Fagard 2011; Onodera 2007, 2014; Traugott 2012, 2014). For example, no doubt is subjective on both the left and right peripheries, whereas
surely is intersubjective on both peripheries (Traugott 2012).
Conversely, the proposition that each periphery has a single meaning has scarcely been challenged, despite the occurrences of cases
where a clear-cut distinction between subjective and intersubjective meaning cannot be made. This study argues that a speaker can use
well as a discourse marker to express his/her subjective perspective in an intersubjective manner on the left
periphery.
Corpora
Du
Bois, John W., Wallace
L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, and Sandra
A. Thompson
2000Santa
Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part
1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data
Consortium.
Du
Bois, John W., Wallace
L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra
A. Thompson, and Nii Martey
2003Santa
Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part
2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data
Consortium.
References
Aijmer, Karin
2013Understanding
Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic
Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press.
Aijmer, Karin, Ad Foolen, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2006 “Pragmatic
Markers in Translation: A Methodological Proposal.” In Approaches to
Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 101–114. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2003 “The
Discourse Particle Well and its Equivalents in Swedish and
Dutch.” Linguistics 41: 1123–1161.
Beeching, Kate
2016Pragmatic
Markers in British English: Meaning in Social
Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Beeching, Kate, and Yu-Fang Wang
2014 “Motivations
for Meaning Shift at the Left and Right Periphery: Well, Bon, and
Hao.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right
Periphery, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 47–71. Leiden: Brill.
Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges
(eds)2014Discourse
Functions at the Left and Right
Periphery. Leiden: Brill.
Brinton, Laurel
J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English:
Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. New York: De
Gruyter Mouton.
Brinton, Laurel
J.
2017The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in
English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen
C. Levinson
1987Politeness:
Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
1960 “The
Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in
Language, ed. by Thomas
Albert Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge: MIT
Press.
Cameron, Deborah
2001Working
with Spoken
Discourse. London: Sage.
Carlson, Lauri
1984“Well”
in Dialogue Games: A Discourse Analysis of the Interjection “Well” in Idealized
Conversation. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Defour, Tine
2008 “The
Speaker’s Voice: A Diachronic Study on the Use of Well and Now as Pragmatic
Markers.” English Text
Construction 1: 62–82.
Defour, Tine, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2010 “ ‘Positive
Appraisal’ as a Core Meaning of Well: A Corpus-Based Analysis in Middle and Early Modern English
Data.” English
Studies 91: 643–673.
Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard
2011 “Alors
Between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position.” Functions of
Language 18: 19–56.
Dér, Csilla
Ilona
2010 “On the Status of Discourse
Markers.” Acta Linguistica
Hungarica 57: 3–28.
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit
2014 “Moi
je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi : French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left vs. Right
Periphery.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right
Periphery, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 24–46. Leiden: Brill.
2009 “An
Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of
Pragmatics 1: 293–320.
Goffman, Erving
1974Frame
Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of
Experience. Boston: Northeastern University
Press.
Haspelmath, Martin
2004 “On
Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to
Grammaticalization.” In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of
Grammaticalization, ed. by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon, 17–44. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Lehmann, Christian
2004 “Theory
and Method in Grammaticalization.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische
Linguistik 32: 152–187.
Levinson, Stephen
C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Onodera, Noriko
O.
2007 “Interplay of
(Inter)Subjectivity and Social Norm.” Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 8: 239–267.
Onodera, Noriko
O.
2011 “Grammaticalization of Discourse
Markers.” In The Oxford Handbook of
Grammaticalization, ed. by Bernd Heine, and Heiko Narrog, 614–624. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Onodera, Noriko
O.
2014 “Setting Up a Mental Space: A
Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and Some Observations about LP and RP in
Japanese.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right
Periphery, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 92–116. Leiden: Brill.
Owen, Marion
1981 “Conversational
Units and the Use of ‘Well’.” In Conversation and
Discourse, ed. by Paul Werth, 99–116. London: Croom
Helm.
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing
and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn
Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation
Analysis, ed. by J.
Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse
Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Schourup, Lawrence
C.
1985Common Discourse Particles in English
Conversation. New York: Garland
Publishing.
Takamura, Ryo
2021 “A
Motivation for Politeness from Interpersonal to Textual Mode: The Case of Well as a Discourse
Marker.” Paper presented at the 17th International Pragmatic
Conference, Winterthur, Switzerland (virtual conference: Webex meeting), 27 June to 2 July
2021.
Takamura, Ryo
2023Discourse
Marker Well in Spoken American English: Some Suggestions for Politeness and
Cross-Linguistics. Yokohama: Shumpusha.
Tannen, Deborah
2007Talking
Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, 2nd
ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth
C.
1982 “From Propositional to Textual
and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of
Grammaticalization.” In Perspectives on Historical
Linguistics, ed. by Winfred
P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, 245–271. Amsterdam: John
Benjamin.
Traugott, Elizabeth
C.
1995 “The Role of the Development of
Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization.” Paper presented
at ICHL XII, Manchester, August
1995.
Traugott, Elizabeth
C.
1999 “From Subjectification to
Intersubjectification.” Paper presented at the Workshop on
Historical Pragmatics, 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver,
Canada.
Traugott, Elizabeth
C.
2003 “From Subjectification to
Intersubjectification.” In Motives for Language
Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth
C.
2010a “Grammaticalization.” In Historical
Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas
H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 97–126. Berlin: De
Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, Elizabeth
C.
2010b “(Inter)Subjectivity and
(Inter)Subjectification: A Reassessment.” In Subjectification,
Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin: De
Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, Elizabeth
C.
2012 “Intersubjectification and
Clause Periphery.” English Text
Construction 5: 7–28.
Traugott, Elizabeth
C.
2014 “On the Function of the
Epistemic Adverbs Surely and No Doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the
Clause.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right
Periphery, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 72–91. Leiden: Brill.
Wang, Yu-Fang, and Pi-Hua Tsai
2005 “Hao
in Spoken Chinese Discourse: Relevance and Coherence.” Language
Sciences 27: 215–243.