“What are you talking about? That is not true” — Men’s and women’s disagreements in English and Italian interactions

Vittorio Napoli
Abstract

The present research aims to uncover cross-linguistic differences (involving British English and Italian), as well as cross-gender differences (men and women) concerning use and preference of strategies and pragmatic modification, in verbal disagreements. The analysis of spontaneous conversations from the Spoken BNC2014 corpus (McEnery et al. 2017), for the English sample, and from the KIParla corpus (Goria and Mauri 2018), for the Italian sample, has brought to light divergences in the realization of disagreements, both at the cross-linguistic and at the cross-gender level. Methodologically speaking, models of analysis used for past empirical studies (Muntigl and Turnbull 1998; Rees-Miller 2000; Johnson 2006; Paramasivam 2007) were drawn from for the annotation and codification of strategies and pragmatic modifiers. Results obtained from quantitative analyses are explained in the light of previous research findings, although the latter are partially disconfirmed and thus call for further future investigations.

Keywords:
Publication history
Table of contents

The pragmatic act of disagreement comes about when the speaker voices an opinion which differs from the one previously expressed by another party in the conversation, thus leading to a disalignment of viewpoints which, using Brown and Levinson’s (1978) terminology, can be face-threatening in terms of politeness. Schegloff (2007, 60), who theorized on disagreements from the angle of Conversation Analysis, defined them “dispreferred second pair parts”, preferred ones being agreements because, on the contrary, they signal alignment with the previous speaker’s opinion.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Aini, Wildan Nurul
2015 “Realization of Disagreement Strategies by Indonesian Speakers.” English Review: Journal of English Education 3 (2): 239–246.Google Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga
2010 “ ‘You Have No Idea What You Are Talking About’: From E-Disagreement to E-Impoliteness in Two Online Fora.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (1): 57–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul
2014Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Behnam, Biook, and Masoumeh Niroomand
2011 “An Investigation of Iranian EFL Learners’ Use of Politeness Strategies and Power Relations in Disagreement Across Different Proficiency Levels.” English Language Teaching 4 (4): 204–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1978Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carli, Linda L.
1989 “Gender Differences in Interaction Style and Influence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (4): 565–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cenni, Irene, and Patrick Goethals
2020 “Responding to Negative Hotel Reviews: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Online Rapport-Management.” Discourse, Context & Media 37: 100430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corino, Elisa
2008 “Do You (Dis)agree? Investigating Agreement and Disagreement in Newsgroups Interaction.” L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria 16 (2): 789–806.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research (1): 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, Michael, and Jacqueline Scott
2009 “Gender-role Egalitarianism — Is the Trend Reversal Real?International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21 (3): 362–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Decock, Sofie, and Anneleen Spiessens
2017 “Customer Complaints and Disagreements in a Multilingual Business Environment. A Discursive-Pragmatic Analysis.” Intercultural Pragmatics 14 (1): 77–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
2001 “Arguing About the Future: On Indirect Disagreements in Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (12): 1881–1900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goria, Eugenio, and Caterina Mauri
2018 “Il corpus KIParla: una nuova risorsa per lo studio dell’italiano parlato.” In CLUB Working Papers in Linguistics, ed. by Francesca Masini, and Fabio Tamburini, 96–116. Bologna: Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna.Google Scholar
Guarda, Marta
2012 “Writer Visibility and Agreement/Disagreement Strategies in Online Asynchronous Interaction: A Learner Corpus Study.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 34: 84–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
(ed.) 1996Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Leo
1991 “Comparatively Polite People in Spain and Britain.” Journal of the Association of Contemporary Iberian Studies 4: 2–6.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, Laura, Raquel Hidalgo, and Angela Downing
2014 “Strategies of (In)directness in Spanish Speakers’ Production of Complaints and Disagreements in English and Spanish.” In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and Implications, ed. by María Angeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez García, and Angela Downing Rothwell, 261–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert
1991Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe
2003 ““Feminine” Workplaces: Stereotypes and Reality.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 573–599. Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, Noriko
2016 “Softening or Intensifying Your Language in Oppositional Talk: Disagreeing Agreeably or Defiantly.” In English for Diplomatic Purposes, ed. by Patricia Friedrich, 20–41. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Fiona
2006 “Agreement and Disagreement: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.” Bisal 1: 41–67.Google Scholar
Kakavà, Christina
1993 “Negotiation of Disagreement by Greeks in Conversations and Classroom Discourse.” PhD dissertation. Georgetown University.
2002 “Opposition in Modern Greek Discourse: Cultural and Contextual Constraints.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1537–1568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katriel, Tamar
1986Talking Straight: Dugri Speech in Israeli Sabra Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
1993 “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures.” Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973 “The Logic of Politeness, or Minding your P’s and Q’s.” In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting, ed. by Claudia Corum, and T. Cedric Smith-Stark, 292–305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1990Talking Power: The Politics of Language in our Lives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Liang, Goudon, and Jing Han
2005 “A Contrastive Study on Disagreement Strategies for Politeness between American English & Mandarin Chinese.” Asian EFL Journal 7 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A.
2010Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
2014 “Expressing Disagreement in English as a Lingua Franca: Whose Pragmatic Rules?Intercultural Pragmatics 11 (2): 199–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masoumeh, Mehregan, Eslamirasekh Abbass, Dabaghi Azizollah, and Jafari Seresht Davood
2013 “Disagreement Expressions in the Discourse of Young Persian Speakers.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 70: 598–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Robbie Love, and Vaclav Brezina
2017 “Introduction: Compiling and Analysing the Spoken British National Corpus 2014.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22 (3): 311–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, Angus
1991 “Research Note: The Effects of Agreement, Disagreement, Gender and Familiarity on Patterns of Dyadic Interaction.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 10 (3): 205–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, and William Turnbull
1998 “Conversational Structure and Facework in Arguing.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (3): 225–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., Sabine Tan, and Marissa K. L. E.
2014 “Multimodal Pragmatics.” In Pragmatics of Discourse, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider, and Anne Barron, 239–270. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paramasivam, Shamala
2007 “Managing Disagreement While Managing Not to Disagree: Polite Disagreement in Negotiation Discourse.” Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 36 (2): 91–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shaped. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ragnedda, Massimo
2014 “Censorship and Media Ownership in Italy in the Era of Berlusconi.” Global Media Journal: Mediterranean Edition 9 (1): 13–26.Google Scholar
Rees-Miller, Janie
2000 “Power, Severity, and Context in Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (8): 1087–1111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1987 “On the Preference for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santamaría García, C.
2001 “Turn Format in Agreeing and Disagreeing Responses.” In Studies in Contrastive Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2nd International Contrastive Linguistics Conference, ed. by Luis Iglesias Rábade, Susana María Doval Suárez, and María de los Ángeles Gómez González, 935–946. Santiago: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
2007 “Categories in Action: Person-Reference and Membership Categorization.” Discourse Studies 9 (4): 433–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1984 “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language in Society 13: 311–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
2012 “Disagreements, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1554–1564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sofwan, Ahmad, and Eko Suwignyo
2011 “The Realization of Disagreement Strategies by Non-Native Speakers of English.” Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature 6 (1): 41–56.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2000 “Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis.” In Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 11–46. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1984a “Spoken and Written Narrative in English and Greek.” In Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 21–41. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
1984bConversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Wainryb, Cecilia, Leigh A. Shaw, Marta Laupa, and Ken R. Smith
2001 “Children’s, Adolescents’, and Young Adults’ Thinking about Different Types of Disagreements.” Developmental Psychology 37 (3): 373–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Vincent R., and James L. Applegate
1994 “Interpersonal Construct Differentiation and Conversational Planning: An Examination of Two Cognitive Accounts for the Production of Competent Verbal Disagreement Tactics.” Human Communication Research 21 (1): 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah, and Elaine Sister
1987 “ ‘Scuse Me, Waitaminute!’: Directive Use in Israeli Hebrew.” Linguistics 25: 1127–1163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Yan
2013 “Gender Differences in Pragmatic Strategies of Disagreement in Chinese.” International Academic Workshop on Social Science (IAW-SC-13), 929–934.Google Scholar