Semantic and pragmatic properties of post-truth discourse: A description of reverse news on social media
ZhonggangSang and TongtongShi
Xi’an Jiaotong University
Abstract
Social media discourse is characterized by the post-truth phenomenon, in which feelings and personal beliefs
appear to exert greater influence on shaping public opinions than truth. In such cases, the truth of news may be blurred and
reported events are often reversed along revelations of the facts. Reverse news on social media is, in a sense, a typical instance
of post-truth discourse. This study attempts to provide a corpus-based description of attitude appraisal and illocutionary acts in
reverse news on social media, with the aim of investigating semantic and pragmatic properties of post-truth discourse. The corpora
for this study consist of social media posts in Chinese and English about a defamation lawsuit, which were collected from Weibo
and Facebook.
The results indicate that the English corpus emphasizes the use of appreciations and judgments with more complex
co-occurring relations among three attitudinal domains while the Chinese corpus contains more judgments than appreciations and
affects. Meanwhile, both corpora exhibit higher frequencies of assertives and expressives than the other acts, yet the Chinese
corpus presents more complicated illocutionary act sequences than the English corpus. After the verdict, the frequencies of both
attitude appraisal and illocutionary acts decrease in the Chinese corpus but increase in the English corpus. Based on this, we
propose that the development of post-truth discourse may go through three functional stages: starting with expression, progressing
to appeal, and ending with representation. The sequence of these stages may vary depending on sociocultural contexts.
The term ‘post-truth’ was first used in The Nation in 1992 to describe political events like Watergate, the
Iran Scandal, and the Gulf War that were characterized by emotions overpowering truth (Kreitner
2016). It was named Word of the Year in 2016 and defined by Oxford Dictionaries as an adjective relating
to “the phenomenon in which people respond more to feelings and beliefs than to facts.” The post-truth phenomenon characterizes social
media discourse within the new media environment, where abundant information provides users with alignment opportunities (Kalpokas 2019, 1). Its foundation lies in “when people consider opinions to be as legitimate
as objective facts or weigh emotional factors as heavily as statistical evidence” (McDermott
2019, 218). As media transformation allows for unrestricted subjectivity in public opinion, these tendencies are amplified
on social media platforms, where emotions and beliefs seem to wield greater influence on public opinion than objective truth.
Therefore, the post-truth phenomenon is a result of advancements in media technologies and social interactions (Ge 2020, 118).
References
Ahmad, Amirah, Norizah Ardi, and Rozaimah Rashidin
2021 “Speech
Acts in Trials of Underage Sexual Criminal Case.” Environment-Behaviour Proceedings
Journal 6 (SI5): 3–9.
Al-Mwzaiji, Khaled Nasser
Ali
2021 “The Political Spin of
Conviction: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Origin of COVID-19.” GEMA Online Journal of
Language
Studies 21 (1): 239–252.
Angermuller, Johannes
2018 “Truth
After Post-Truth: For a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies.” Palgrave
Communication 4 (30): 1–8.
Austin, John
Langshaw
1962How to Do Things with
Words. Cambridge: Harvard University
Press.
Bühler, Karl
2011Theory
of Language: The Representational Function of
Language. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Carretero, Marta, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo, M.
Ángeles Martínez
2015 “An
Analysis of Expressive Speech Acts in Online Task-Oriented Interaction by University
Students.” Procedia — Social and Behavioral
Sciences 173: 186–190.
2020 “ ‘后真相’时代网络民粹主义主导舆论的机制及其治理 [The mechanism and governance of
public opinion led by internet populism in the ‘post-truth’ era].” Dong Yue
Tribune 41 (5): 118–124.
Halliday, Michael
A. K.
1973Explorations in the Functions of
Language. London: Edward
Arnold.
Harsin, Jayson
2018 “Post-Truth
and Critical Communication Studies.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of
Communication.
Kalmanovitch, Yshai
2021 “A
Pragmatic Analysis of Descriptive, Depictive and Simulative Reporting Speech Acts: Empirical Evidence from a Prosodic Study on
Conversational Modern Israeli Hebrew.” Journal of
Pragmatics 172: 119–145.
Kalpokas, Ignas
2019 “Affective
Encounters of the Algorithmic Kind: Post-Truth and Posthuman Pleasure.” Social Media +
Society 5 (2): 1–12.
Keyes, Ralph
2004The
Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. New
York: St. Martin’s Press.
2019 “ ‘反转新闻’视角下新闻真实性再探 [Further exploration of news authenticity
from the perspective of ‘reverse news’].” Youth
Journalist (15): 25–26.
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ullrich
K. H. Ecker, and John Cook
2017 “Beyond
Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the ‘Post-Truth’ Era.” Journal of Applied
Research in Memory and
Cognition 6 (4): 353–369.
Liang, Weishan., and Shisheng Liu
2019 “新闻叙事中的‘后真相’现象及其语篇分析 [The ‘post-truth’ phenomenon in news
narratives: a case study].” Foreign Languages
Research 36 (4): 50–56.
Liu, Lihua
2010评价理论研究 [Studies of appraisal
theory]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and
Research Press.
Luporini, Antonella
2021 “Metaphor,
Nominalization, Appraisal: Analyzing Coronavirus-Related Headlines and Subheadings in China Daily and
The Wall Street Journal.” GEMA Online Journal of Language
Studies 21 (1): 253–273.
Ma, Yuan
2018 “批评性话语分析视角下反转新闻的话语表达与意义建构 [Discourse expression and meaning
construction of reverse news from the perspective of critical discourse analysis].” Jiang-huai
Tribune (1): 118–122.
Martin, James
R.
2000 “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal
Systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the
Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Martin, James
R., and Peter
R. R. White
2005The
Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New
York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, James
R., and David Rose
2007Working
with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. 2nd
ed. London: Bloomsbury.
Mohamad, Azweed, Radzuwan
Ab Rashid, Kamariah Yunus, et al
2018 “Speech
Acts in the Facebook Status Updates Posted by an Apostate.” International Journal of English
Linguistics 8 (4): 226–231.
McDermott, Rose
2019 “Psychological
Underpinnings of Post-Truth in Political Beliefs.” PS-Political Science &
Politics 52 (2): 218–222.
Ruotsalainen, Juho, Jaana Hujanen, and Mikko Villi
2021 “A
Future of Journalism Beyond the Objectivity — Dialogue Divide Hybridity in the News of Entrepreneurial
Journalists.” Journalism 22 (9): 2240–2258.
Qiao, Fang, Kexin Jiang
2022 “Attitudes
Towards Global Warming on Twitter.” Journal of Global Information
Management 30 (7): 1–20.
Safavi, Sarvenaz
2021 “Bühler’s
Organon Model of Communication: A Semiotic Analysis of Advertising
Slogans.” Semiotica 242: 229–239.
Searle, John.
R.
1976 “A Classification of
Illocutionary Acts.” Language in
Society 5 (1): 1–23.
Searle, John
R.
1979Expression and Meaning: Studies in the
Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Searle, John
R., and Daniel Vanderveken
1985Foundations
of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
van
Dijk, Teun
A.
1977aText and Context: Explorations in the
Semantics and Pragmatics of
Discourse. London: Longman.
van
Dijk, Teun
A.
1977b “Context and Cognition:
Knowledge Frames and Speech Act Comprehension.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1: 211–232.
van
Dijk, Teun
A.
1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary
Approach. London: SAGE.
Van
Olmen, Daniël, and Vittorio Tantucci
2022 “Getting
Attention in different Languages: A Usage-Based Approach to Parenthetical Look in Chinese, Dutch, English, and
Italian.” Intercultural
Pragmatics 19 (2): 141–181.
Waisbord, Silvio
2018a “The
Elective Affinity Between Post-Truth Communication and Populist Politics.” Communication
Research and
Practice 4 (1): 17–34.
Waisbord, Silvio
2018b “Truth
Is What Happens to News: On Journalism, Fake News, and Post-Truth.” Journalism
Studies 19 (13): 1866–1878.
White, Peter
R. R.
2015 “Appraisal
Theory.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social
Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel, 1–7. Wiley-Blackwell.
Zeng, Xiangmin, and Jinrong Dai
2020 “新媒体语境下新闻反转、舆论生成机制和治理路径探究——基于2014-2020年典型反转新闻事件的定性比较分析(QCA)研究 [Research on reversal news, public opinion generation mechanism and governance path in the context of new media — Based on the
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) study of typical reversal news events from 2014 to
2020].” Journal of Social
Sciences (7): 168–184.
Zhang, Lushan
2020 “浅析网络自媒体环境下的反转新闻现象 [Analysis of the reverse news phenomenon in
the network self-media environment].” Southeast
Communication (5): 5–7.
2022 “Comparative
Study of Chinese and American Media Reports on the Covid-19 and Expressions of Social Responsibility: A Critical Discourse
Analysis.” Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research 51 (3): 455–472.
Zhao, Luolin, and Nicholas John
2020 “The
Concept of ‘Sharing’ in Chinese Social Media: Origins, Transformations and
Implications.” Information, Communication &
Society: 1–17.