Malte Rosemeyer and María Sol SansiñenaFuture-inflected wh-interrogatives in Spanish

¿Cómo va a ser posible? The situated meanings of periphrastic and synthetic future-inflected wh-interrogatives in Spanish

Malte Rosemeyer and María Sol SansiñenaFreie Universität Berlin | KU Leuven

We analyze the use and distribution of Spanish synthetic and periphrastic future-inflected wh-interrogatives in a corpus of informal Spanish conversations, within Linell’s (2009) Dialogical Theory of Language. Our corpus analysis reveals that future-inflected interrogatives realize three types of discourse functions: information requests, interactional challenges, and requests for inference, each clearly distinguishable in terms of their distribution at the sentence and discourse level. The results highlight the importance of speaker attitude and, particularly, their expectations regarding the answerability of the request. Use of the synthetic future is common in invitations to inference, in which the hearer is not expected to be able to answer the question, whereas use of the periphrastic future is prototypical in requests for information and interactional challenges, indicating a grammaticalization path towards modal meanings. Our findings underscore the value of corpus-based pragmatic analysis for understanding how grammatical choices reflect interactional meaning-making.

Keywords:
  • future,
  • modality,
  • interrogative,
  • question,
  • Spanish,
  • periphrasis
Publication history
Table of contents

Spanish possesses two constructions that are usually described as expressing futurity and related meanings: the synthetic future (SF, see (1a)) and the periphrastic future (PF, see (1b)).

Funding

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Freie Universität Berlin.

References

Aaron, Jessi Elana
2010 “Pushing the Envelope: Looking beyond the Variable Context.” Language Variation and Change 22: 1–36. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1017​/S0954394509990226
2014 “A Certain Future: Epistemicity, Prediction, and Assertion in Iberian Spanish Future Expression.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7 (2): 215–240. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1515​/shll​-2014​-1166
Auer, Peter
2016 “ ‘Wie geil ist das denn?’ Eine neue Konstruktion im Netzwerk ihrer Nachbarn.” Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 44 (1): 69–92. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1515​/zgl​-2016​-0003
Blas Arroyo, José Luis
2008 “The Variable Expression of Future Tense in Peninsular Spanish: The present (and Future) of Inflectional Forms in the Spanish Spoken in a Bilingual Region.” Language Variation and Change 20 (1): 85–126. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1017​/S095439450800001X
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Laura Vincze, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
2018 “Questions and Epistemic Stance: Some Examples from Italian Conversations.” Ampersand 5: 29–44. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1016​/j​.amper​.2018​.11​.001
Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins
1991 “Back to the Future.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 16–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/tsl​.19​.2​.04byb
Caponigro, Ivano, and Jon Sprouse
2007 “Rhetorical Questions as Questions.” In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11 , ed. by Louise McNally, and Estela Puig-Waldmüller, 121–133. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Cerović, Marijana
2016 “When Suspects Ask Questions: Rhetorical Questions as a Challenging Device.” Journal of Pragmatics 105: 18–38. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1016​/j​.pragma​.2016​.09​.010
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1017​/CBO9780511620539
Clift, Rebecca
1999 “Irony in Conversation.” Language in Society 28 (4): 523–553. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1017​/S0047404599004029
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2018Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1017​/9781139507318
Cresti, Emanuela, and Massimo Moneglia
2005C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/scl​.15
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” In Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1016​/0378​-2166(95)00014​-3
Drew, Paul
2012 “What Drives Sequences?Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 61–68. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1080​/08351813​.2012​.646688
Egg, Markus
2007 “Meaning and Use of Rhetorical Questions.” In Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium (1): 73–78. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.
Ehmer, Oliver, and Malte Rosemeyer
2018 “When ‘Questions’ Are Not Questions. Inferences and Conventionalization in Spanish But-Prefaced Partial Interrogatives.” In Open Linguistics 4: 70–100. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1515​/opli​-2018​-0005
Enfield, Nicholas J., Penelope Brown, and Jan P. De Ruiter
2012 “Epistemic Dimensions of Polar Questions: Sentence-Final Particles in Comparative Perspective.” In Questions, ed. by Jan De Ruiter, 193–221. West Nyack: Cambridge University Press. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1017​/CBO9781139045414​.014
Enghels, Renata
2018 “On the Grammaticalization of the Deverbal Epistemic Pragmatic Marker sabes: A Study in Recent Language Change.” Revue roumaine de linguistique [Romanian review of linguistics] 63: 341–360.
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
2010 “Futuro y evidencialidad.” Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 26: 9–34.
2014 “Evidential Futures: The Case of Spanish.” In Future Tense vs. Future Time: An Introduction, ed. by Philippe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine, and Saghie Sharifzadeh, 219–246. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1093​/acprof:oso​/9780199679157​.003​.0010
2018 “Evidential Commitment and Feature Mismatch in Spanish estar Constructions.” Journal of Pragmatics 128: 102–115. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1016​/j​.pragma​.2017​.10​.004
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti
2021 “Spanish ‘Mirative Future’.” In Expressive Meaning Across Linguistic Levels and Frameworks, ed. by Andreas Trotzke, and Xavier Villalba, 167–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1093​/oso​/9780198871217​.003​.0009
Evans, Nicholas, Henrik Bergqvist, and Lila San Roque
2018 “The Grammar of Engagement I: Framework and Initial Exemplification.” In Language and Cognition 10: 110–140. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1017​/langcog​.2017​.21
Fillmore, Charles J.
1996 “The Pragmatics of Constructions.” In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language, ed. by Dan Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis, and Guo Jiansheng. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fleischman, Suzanne
1982The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garassino, Davide
2022 “A Contrastive Perspective on French and Italian Wh-in situ questions. A Discourse-Pragmatic Approach.” In Functions of Language 29: 25–57. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/fol​.00037​.gar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2008 “Topicalization and Preverbal Subjects in Spanish Wh-Interrogatives.” In Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Joyce Bruhn de Garavito, and Elena Valenzuela, 225–236. Somerville: Cascadilla.
Haugh, Michael
2010 “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2106–2119. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1016​/j​.pragma​.2009​.12​.018
Hayano, Kaoru
2013 “Question Design in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Malden: Blackwell. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1002​/9781118325001​.ch19
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2009Questioning in Medicine. In Why Do You Ask? The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. New York: Oxford University Press. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1093​/acprof:oso​/9780195306897​.003​.0003
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
2010Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Malden: Wiley Blackwell. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1002​/9781444318135
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Mercedes Tubino-Blanco
2023 “Inferential Interrogatives with qué in Spanish.” Languages 8 (4): 282. https://​doi​.org​/10​.3390​/languages8040282
Jørgensen, Annette Myre, and Esperanza Eguía Padilla
2017Proyecto COLA. Corpus Oral de Languaje Adolescente. http://​www​.colam​.org/ 〈21-12-2017〉.
Koshik, Irene
2003 “ Wh-Questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies 5: 51–77. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1177​/14614456030050010301
Kotthoff, Helga
2009 “Joint Construction of Humorous Fictions in Conversation. An Unnamed Narrative Activity in a Playful Keying.” Journal of Literary Theory 3 (3): 195–217. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1515​/JLT​.2009​.012
Ledgeway, Adam, and Martin Maiden
2016The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1093​/acprof:oso​/9780199677108​.001​.0001
Linell, Per
2009a “Constructions in Dialogue.” In Contexts and Constructions, ed. by Alexander Bergs, and Gabriele Diewald, 97–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/cal​.9​.05lin
2009bRethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1108​/978​-1​-60752​-198​-3
Marcos Marín, Francisco
2017Corpus oral de referencia de la lengua española contemporánea. Available online at http://​www​.lllf​.uam​.es​/ESP​/Info%20Corlec​.html. Last access 20/01/2017.
Marín Arrese, Juana
2017 “Multifunctionality of Evidential Expressions in Discourse Domains and Genres: Evidence from Cross-Linguistic Case Studies.” In Evidentiality Revisited. Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. by Juana Marín Arrese, Gerda Haßler, and Marta Carretero, 195–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/pbns​.271​.09mar
Matos Amaral, Patrícia, and Scott A. Schwenter
2003 “Contrast and the (Non-)Ocurrence of Subject Pronouns.” In Selected Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by David Eddington, 116–127. Somerville: Cascadilla.
Matte Bon, Francisco, and Ma del Pilar Hernández Mercedes
2007 “Las maneras de hablar del futuro en español: Del sistema codificado a las interpretaciones contextuales.” MarcoELE: Revista de Didáctica 5: 1–24.
Mithun, Marianne
2016 “How Fascinating! Insubordinate Exclamations.” In Insubordination, ed. by Nicholas Evans, and Honoré Watanabe, 367–392. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/tsl​.115​.14mit
Montes, Rosa Graciela
1999 “The Development of Discourse Markers in Spanish: Interjections.” In Journal of Pragmatics 31 (10): 1289–1319. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1016​/S0378​-2166(98)00106​-4
Myers, Lindsy Lee
2007WH-Interrogatives in Spoken French: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Their Form and Function. PhD thesis. University of Texas at Austin.
Nuyts, Jan
2001Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/hcp​.5
Olbertz, Hella
1998Verbal Periphrases in a Functional Grammar of Spanish. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1515​/9783110820881
Orozco, Rafael
2005 “Distribution of Future Time Forms in Northern Colombian Spanish.” In Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by David Eddington, 56–65. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Palmer, Frank Robert
2001Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1017​/CBO9781139167178
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage
2012 “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sydnell, and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1002​/9781118325001​.ch11
Primerano, Antoine, and Miriam Bouzouita
2024 “La gramaticalización de los futuros y condicionales en el navarroaragonés de los siglos XIII y XIV : Una comparación con el castellano medieval.” In Revue Romane 59: 143–184. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/rro​.21015​.pri
RAE/ASALE
2009Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa.
Reig Alamilio, Asela
2019 “Las interrogativas hipotéticas con qué invariable en español: Un tipo de interrogativas parciales marcadas.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12 (1): 155–178. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1515​/shll​-2019​-2004
Reinhardt, Janina
2019 “Regularity and Variation in French Direct Interrogatives: The Morphosyntax and Intonation of Question Forms in Reality TV Shows, Audio Books and Teaching Materials.” PhD thesis. University of Konstanz. http://​nbn​-resolving​.de​/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352​-2​-y00meiao8m342
Rivero, María Luisa
2014 “Spanish Inferential and Mirative Futures and Conditionals: An Evidential Gradable Modal Proposal.” Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 151 (B): 197–215. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1016​/j​.lingua​.2014​.04​.009
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2019El futuro en español. Tiempo, conocimiento, interacción. Bern: Peter Lang. https://​doi​.org​/10​.3726​/b15234
Rosemeyer, Malte
2018 “The Pragmatics of Spanish Postposed-Wh-Interrogatives.” Folia Linguistica 52 (2): 283–317. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1515​/flin​-2018​-0007
2019 “Brazilian Portuguese in-situ Wh-Interrogatives between Rhetoric and Change.” Glossa 4(1): 1–29. https://​doi​.org​/10​.5334​/gjgl​.900
Rosemeyer, Malte, and María Sol Sansiñena
2022 “How Sentence Type Influences the Interpretation of Spanish Future Constructions.” In Functions of Language 29 (1): 116–141. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/fol​.00040​.ros
Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(2001) Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/sidag​.10
Squartini, Mario
2001 “The Internal Structure of Evidentiality in Romance.” Studies in Language 25 (2): 297–334. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/sl​.25​.2​.05squ
2004 “Disentangling Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Romance.” Lingua 114 (7): 873–895. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1016​/S0024​-3841(03)00064​-0
Stalnaker, Robert
1973 “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447–457. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1007​/BF00262951
2002 “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1023​/A:1020867916902
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1080​/08351810903471258
Waltereit, Richard
2018 “Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the French est-ce que Question.” Open Linguistics 4: 56–69. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1515​/opli​-2018​-0004

Address for correspondence

Malte Rosemeyer

Fachbereich Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften

Institut für Romanische Philologie

Freie Universität Berlin

Habelschwerdter Allee 45

Berlin D-14195

Germany

[email protected]

Biographical notes

Malte Rosemeyer is Professor of Romance Philology/Spanish Sociolinguistics at Freie Universität Berlin. He specializes in Ibero-Romance linguistics, focusing on explaining variation and change in grammatical structure. His work proceeds from the premise that linguistic structures emerge from social interaction and employs quantitative corpus-linguistic and psycholinguistic methods to trace how interaction shapes language over time. He also conducts research in interactional linguistics, particularly on the grammar of spoken Romance languages, and develops quantitative models of interactional patterns.

María Sol Sansiñena is Associate Professor of Spanish Linguistics at the University of Leuven. Her research lines address not only the semantic and pragmatic aspects of interpretation, but also the analysis of form, meaning, and function, or use of modal/attitudinal and other TAM categories, as well as the expression of perspective. Her research interests include interaction and grammar, indexicality, insubordination and other discourse-level phenomena, and language variation and change.

Publication history
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue