¿Cómo va a ser posible? The situated meanings of periphrastic and synthetic future-inflected wh-interrogatives in Spanish

Malte Rosemeyer and María Sol Sansiñena
Freie Universität Berlin | KU Leuven

We analyze the use and distribution of Spanish synthetic and periphrastic future-inflected wh-interrogatives in a corpus of informal Spanish conversations, within Linell’s (2009) Dialogical Theory of Language. Our corpus analysis reveals that future-inflected interrogatives realize three types of discourse functions: information requests, interactional challenges, and requests for inference, each clearly distinguishable in terms of their distribution at the sentence and discourse level. The results highlight the importance of speaker attitude and, particularly, their expectations regarding the answerability of the request. Use of the synthetic future is common in requests to inference, in which the hearer is not expected to be able to answer the question, whereas use of the periphrastic future is prototypical in requests for information and interactional challenges, indicating a grammaticalization path towards modal meanings. Our findings underscore the value of corpus-based pragmatic analysis for understanding how grammatical choices reflect interactional meaning-making.

Publication history

Date received: 16 April 2024

Date accepted: 5 December 2025

Table of contents

Spanish possesses two constructions that are usually described as expressing futurity and related meanings: the synthetic future (SF, see (1a)) and the periphrastic future (PF, see (1b)).

Funding

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Freie Universität Berlin.

References

Aaron, Jessi Elana
2010 “Pushing the Envelope: Looking beyond the Variable Context.” Language Variation and Change 22: 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014 “A Certain Future: Epistemicity, Prediction, and Assertion in Iberian Spanish Future Expression.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7 (2): 215–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
2016 “ ‘Wie geil ist das denn?’ Eine neue Konstruktion im Netzwerk ihrer Nachbarn.” Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 44 (1): 69–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis
2008 “The Variable Expression of Future Tense in Peninsular Spanish: The Present (and Future) of Inflectional Forms in the Spanish Spoken in a Bilingual Region.” Language Variation and Change 20 (1): 85–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Laura Vincze, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
2018 “Questions and Epistemic Stance: Some Examples from Italian Conversations.” Ampersand 5: 29–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins
1991 “Back to the Future.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 16–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano, and Jon Sprouse
2007 “Rhetorical Questions as Questions.” In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11 , ed. by Louise McNally, and Estela Puig-Waldmüller, 121–133. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cerović, Marijana
2016 “When Suspects Ask Questions: Rhetorical Questions as a Challenging Device.” Journal of Pragmatics 105: 18–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
1999 “Irony in Conversation.” Language in Society 28 (4): 523–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2018 Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela, and Massimo Moneglia
2005 C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
2012 “What Drives Sequences?” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 61–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egg, Markus
2007 “Meaning and Use of Rhetorical Questions.” In Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium (1): 73–78. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehmer, Oliver, and Malte Rosemeyer
2018 “When ‘Questions’ Are Not Questions. Inferences and Conventionalization in Spanish But-Prefaced Partial Interrogatives.” Open Linguistics 4: 70–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J., Penelope Brown, and Jan De Ruiter
2012 “Epistemic Dimensions of Polar Questions: Sentence-Final Particles in Comparative Perspective.” In Questions, ed. by Jan De Ruiter, 193–221. West Nyack: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata
2018 “On the Grammaticalization of the Deverbal Epistemic Pragmatic Marker sabes: A Study in Recent Language Change.” Revue roumaine de linguistique [Romanian review of linguistics] 63: 341–360.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
2010 “Futuro y evidencialidad.” Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 26: 9–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014 “Evidential Futures: The Case of Spanish.” In Future Tense vs. Future Time: An Introduction, ed. by Philippe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine, and Saghie Sharifzadeh, 219–246. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018 “Evidential Commitment and Feature Mismatch in Spanish estar Constructions.” Journal of Pragmatics 128: 102–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti
2021 “Spanish ‘Mirative Future’.” In Expressive Meaning Across Linguistic Levels and Frameworks, ed. by Andreas Trotzke, and Xavier Villalba, 167–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Henrik Bergqvist, and Lila San Roque
2018 “The Grammar of Engagement I: Framework and Initial Exemplification.” Language and Cognition 10: 110–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1996 “The Pragmatics of Constructions.” In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language, ed. by Dan Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis, and Guo Jiansheng. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1982 The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garassino, Davide
2022 “A Contrastive Perspective on French and Italian Wh-in situ Questions. A Discourse-Pragmatic Approach.” Functions of Language 29: 25–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2008 “Topicalization and Preverbal Subjects in Spanish Wh-Interrogatives.” In Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Joyce Bruhn de Garavito, and Elena Valenzuela, 225–236. Somerville: Cascadilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2010 “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2106–2119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru
2013 “Question Design in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Malden: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009 “Questioning in Medicine.” In Why Do You Ask? The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
2010 Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Malden: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Mercedes Tubino-Blanco
2023 “Inferential Interrogatives with qué in Spanish.” Languages 8 (4): 282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre, and Esperanza Eguía Padilla
2017 Proyecto COLA. Corpus Oral de Lenguaje Adolescente. http://​www​.colam​.org/
Koshik, Irene
2003 “ Wh-Questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies 5: 51–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
2009 “Joint Construction of Humorous Fictions in Conversation. An Unnamed Narrative Activity in a Playful Keying.” Journal of Literary Theory 3 (3): 195–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam, and Martin Maiden
2016 The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2009a “Constructions in Dialogue.” In Contexts and Constructions, ed. by Alexander Bergs, and Gabriele Diewald, 97–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009b Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcos Marín, Francisco
2017 Corpus oral de referencia de la lengua española contemporánea. Available online at http://​www​.lllf​.uam​.es​/ESP​/Info%20Corlec​.html. Last access 20/01/2017.
Marín Arrese, Juana
2017 “Multifunctionality of Evidential Expressions in Discourse Domains and Genres: Evidence from Cross-Linguistic Case Studies.” In Evidentiality Revisited. Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. by Juana Marín Arrese, Gerda Haßler, and Marta Carretero, 195–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matos Amaral, Patrícia, and Scott A. Schwenter
2003 “Contrast and the (Non-)Occurrence of Subject Pronouns.” In Selected Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by David Eddington, 116–127. Somerville: Cascadilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matte Bon, Francisco, and Ma del Pilar Hernández Mercedes
2007 “Las maneras de hablar del futuro en español: Del sistema codificado a las interpretaciones contextuales.” MarcoELE: Revista de Didáctica 5: 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2016 “How Fascinating! Insubordinate Exclamations.” In Insubordination, ed. by Nicholas Evans, and Honoré Watanabe, 367–392. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montes, Rosa Graciela
1999 “The Development of Discourse Markers in Spanish: Interjections.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (10): 1289–1319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Lindsy Lee
2007 “WH-Interrogatives in Spoken French: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Their Form and Function.” PhD thesis. University of Texas at Austin.
Nuyts, Jan
2001 Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olbertz, Hella
1998 Verbal Periphrases in a Functional Grammar of Spanish. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orozco, Rafael
2005 “Distribution of Future Time Forms in Northern Colombian Spanish.” In Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by David Eddington, 56–65. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert
2001 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage
2012 “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Malden: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primerano, Antoine, and Miriam Bouzouita
2024 “La gramaticalización de los futuros y condicionales en el navarroaragonés de los siglos XIII y XIV : Una comparación con el castellano medieval.” In Revue Romane 59: 143–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RAE/ASALE
2009 Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reig Alamilio, Asela
2019 “Las interrogativas hipotéticas con qué invariable en español: Un tipo de interrogativas parciales marcadas.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12 (1): 155–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Janina
2019 “Regularity and Variation in French Direct Interrogatives: The Morphosyntax and Intonation of Question Forms in Reality TV Shows, Audio Books and Teaching Materials.” PhD thesis. University of Konstanz. http://​nbn​-resolving​.de​/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352​-2​-y00meiao8m342
Rivero, María Luisa
2014 “Spanish Inferential and Mirative Futures and Conditionals: An Evidential Gradable Modal Proposal.” Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 151 (B): 197–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2019 El futuro en español. Tiempo, conocimiento, interacción. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte
2018 “The Pragmatics of Spanish Postposed-Wh-Interrogatives.” Folia Linguistica 52 (2): 283–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019 “Brazilian Portuguese in-situ Wh-Interrogatives between Rhetoric and Change.” Glossa 4(1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte, and María Sol Sansiñena
2022 “How Sentence Type Influences the Interpretation of Spanish Future Constructions.” Functions of Language 29 (1): 116–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
eds. 2001 Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2001 “The Internal Structure of Evidentiality in Romance.” Studies in Language 25 (2): 297–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004 “Disentangling Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Romance.” Lingua 114 (7): 873–895. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1973 “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002 “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2018 “Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the French est-ce que Question.” Open Linguistics 4: 56–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar

Address for correspondence

Malte Rosemeyer

Fachbereich Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften

Institut für Romanische Philologie

Freie Universität Berlin

Habelschwerdter Allee 45

Berlin D-14195

Germany

[email protected]

Biographical notes

Malte Rosemeyer is Professor of Romance Philology/Spanish Sociolinguistics at Freie Universität Berlin. He specializes in Ibero-Romance linguistics, focusing on explaining variation and change in grammatical structure. His work proceeds from the premise that linguistic structures emerge from social interaction and employs quantitative corpus-linguistic and psycholinguistic methods to trace how interaction shapes language over time. He also conducts research in interactional linguistics, particularly on the grammar of spoken Romance languages, and develops quantitative models of interactional patterns.

ORCiD logo with linkhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-561X

María Sol Sansiñena is Associate Professor of Spanish Linguistics at the University of Leuven. Her research lines address not only the semantic and pragmatic aspects of interpretation, but also the analysis of form, meaning, and function, or use of modal/attitudinal and other TAM categories, as well as the expression of perspective. Her research interests include interaction and grammar, indexicality, insubordination and other discourse-level phenomena, and language variation and change.

ORCiD logo with linkhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4824-9177
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue