Who benefits from an imperative? Assessment of directives on a benefit scale
The distribution of benefits associated with a projected future action has been considered important in determining the type of directive expressed by an imperative. However, there has been little research on how speakers perceive the beneficiary of future action in imperatives and how these perceptions are influenced by the linguistic forms in the imperative utterance. This article reports on an experiment on Czech that tests whether the distinction between imperatives benefiting the speaker and imperatives benefiting the addressee is valid and whether it is influenced by the grammatical person of a modal verb expressing a rationale for the imperative. The results show that imperatives preceded by a first-person modal are judged as benefiting the speaker and imperatives preceded by a second-person modal as benefiting the addressee. The study thus demonstrates how the exact same imperative can be linguistically manipulated to be interpreted as benefiting either the speaker or the addressee.
Keywords:
- directives,
- imperative,
- speech act,
- cost-benefit,
- beneficiary,
- benefactive status and stance,
- Czech
Publication history
Imperatives are known to express a wide range of speech acts, from commands, orders and requests, as in (1a)–(1c), to suggestions, invitations and good wishes, as in (1d)–(1f).
Funding
This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund project “Beyond Security: Role of Conflict in Resilience-Building” (reg. no.: CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004595).
This article was made Open Access under a CC BY 4.0 license through payment of an APC by or on behalf of the authors.
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
Y.
2010 Imperatives and
Commands. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Auer, Peter
2017 “Epilogue.
Imperatives — The Language of Immediate Action.” In Imperative Turns
at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 411–423. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.14aue
Běličová, Helena
1998 Nástin
porovnávací morfologie spisovných jazyků
slovanských. Praha: Karolinum.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
1960 “The
Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in
Language, ed. by Thomas
A. Sebeok, 253–276. New
York: MIT Press.
Clayman, Steven
E., and John Heritage
2014 “Benefactors
and Beneficiaries. Benefactive Status and Stance in the Management of Offers and
Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, Studies in Language
and Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 51–82. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.03cla
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014 “What
Does Grammar Tell Us about
Action?” Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647.
de
Hoop, Helen, Jetske Klatter, Gijs Mulder, and Tijn Schmitz
2016 “Imperatives
and Politeness in Dutch.” In Linguistics in the
Netherlands, ed. by Jenny Audring, and Sander Lestrade, 41–53. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.33.04hoo
Dominicy, Marc, and Nathalie Franken
2002 “Speech
Acts and Relevance Theory.” In Essays in Speech Act
Theory, ed. by Daniel Vanderveken, and Susumo Kubo, 263–283. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.77.16dom
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
M.
1976 “Is Sybil There? The Structure
of Some American English Directives.” Language in
Society 5: 25–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006849
Filimonova, Elena
2005 “Clusivity
Cross-linguistically: Common Trends and Possible
Patterns.” In: Clusivity: Typology and Case Studies of
Inclusive-Exclusive Distinction, ed. by Elena Filimonova, 399–424. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.63.19fil
Hernandez, Perez
Lorena, and Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza
2002 “Grounding,
Semantic Motivation, and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Directive Speech acts.” Journal of
Pragmatics 34: 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)80002-9
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey
K. Pullum
2002 The
Cambridge Grammar of the English
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530
Huntley, Martin
1984 “The
Semantics of English Imperatives.” Linguistics and
Philosophy 7: 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630809
Janda, Laura
A., and Charles
E. Townsend
2000 Czech. Munich: Lincom
Europa.
Jary, Mark, and Mikhail Kissine
2014 Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998126
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per
B. Brockhoff, Rune
H. B. Christensen
2017 “lmerTest
Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical
Software 82 (13): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles
of
Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lüdecke, Daniel
2018 “ggeffects:
Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models.” Journal of Open Source
Software 3 (26): 772. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772
MacWhinney, Brian
2005 “The
Emergence of Grammar from Perspective.” In Language Acquisition,
Change and Emergence: Essays in Evolutionary Linguistics, ed. by James Minett, and William Wang, 1–58. City
University of HK Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968.009
Naughton, James
2005 Czech:
An Essential
Grammar. London: Routledge.
Navarro, Danielle
2015 Learning
Statistics with R: A Tutorial for Psychology Students and Other Beginners (Version
0.6). Sydney: University of New South
Wales.
Nekvapil, Jiří, and Jiří
Václav Neustupný
2005 “Politeness
in the Czech Republic: Distance, Levels of Expressions, Management and Intercultural
Contact.” In Politeness in Europe, ed.
by Leo Hickey, and Mirand Stewart, 247–262. Clevedon: Multilingual
Matters. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27710917.21
Portner, Paul
2007 “Imperatives
and Modals.” Natural Language
Semantics 15: 351–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9022-y
2004 “The
Semantics of Imperatives within a Theory of Clause
Types.” In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT)
XIV, ed. by Robert Young, 235–252. Ithaca: Cornell
University. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v14i0.2907
Posit team
2023 RStudio: Integrated
Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC. Boston, MA. 〈http://www.posit.co/〉.
Rossi, Giovanni
2017 “Secondary
and Deviant Uses of the Imperative for Requesting in
Italian.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in
Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 103–137. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.04ros
R Core Team
2024 R: A Language and
Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna,
Austria. 〈https://www.R-project.org/〉.
Takahashi, Hidemitsu
2012 A
Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the English Imperative. With Special Reference to Japanese Imperatives. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.35
Thompson, Sandra, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005 “The
Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction.” Discourse
Studies 7: 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054403
Thornburg, Linda, and Klaus-Uwe Panther
1997 “Speech
Act Metonymies.” In Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive
Linguistics, ed. by Wolf-Andreas Lierbert, Gisela Redeker, and Linda Waugh, 205–219. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.151.14tho
Wickham, Hadley, Mara Averick, Jennifer Bryan, et al.
2019 “Welcome
to the Tidyverse.” Journal of Open Source
Software 4 (43): 1686. 〈 https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686〉.
Zehr, Jérémy, and Florian Schwarz
2018 PennController
for Internet Based Experiments (IBEX). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832