The conceptual semantics of English ‘speak’ (and why it matters)

This study investigates the conceptual semantics of the English verb speak, using the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach to semantic analysis. The analysis is corpus-assisted, relying mainly on two corpora: one very large (enTenTen21, more than fifty-two billion words), the other small and purpose-built (about 500 ‘speak’ sentences from twelve recent novels). Using the traditional “definitional” criterion for polysemy, the analysis recognises four senses of English speak, which form a polysemic web or network of meanings and usages. A range of supporting lexicogrammatical evidence is adduced, such as the proposed polysemic meanings having distinctive morphosyntactic properties, collocational profiles, and associated derivatives and phraseology. The paper also raises an ethnoaxiological question for linguistics as a discipline: To what extent has the discourse of mainstream Western linguistics been guided or shaped by an Anglo-English metapragmatic model of speaking, whereby “saying” is framed as individual, purposeful, contentful, and oral/aural?

Publication history
Table of contents

The verb speak, together with its derivatives, plays a tremendous role in the Anglophone vocabulary of theoretical, descriptive and applied linguistics (cf. Levisen 2025). It is no exaggeration to say that one can hardly “do linguistics” in English without using the word speak. English language monographs, textbooks and research studies are peppered with phrases such as those in (1) and (2).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Boas, Hans C.
ed. 2009Multilingual FrameNets in Computational Lexicography. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C., Josef Ruppenhofer, and Collin Baker
2024 “FrameNet at 25.” International Journal of Lexicography 37: 263–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Saussure, Ferdinand
1916Cours de linguistique générale, ed. by Charles Bally, and Albert Sechehaye, with the assistance of Albert Riedlinger. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013Course in General Linguistics. Translated and annotated by Roy Harris, 3rd edition. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, René, Louis Goossens, Yvan Putseys, and Emma Vorlat
1982 “Introduction.” In The Scene of Linguistic Action and its Perspectivization by SPEAK, TALK, SAY and TELL, ed. by René Dirven, Louis Goossens, Yvan Putseys, and Emma Vorlat, 9–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1991A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. Clarendon Press: Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
2002 “Word: A Typological Framework”. In Word: A Cross-linguistic Typology, ed. by R. M. W. Dixon, and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FrameNet (online resource)
https://​berkeleyfn​.framenetbr​.ufjf​.br/ [current site, pages Frame Index and Lexical Unit Index] https://​framenet​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu/ [legacy site, pages Frame Index and Lexical Unit Index]
Gatto, Maristella
2014Web as Corpus: Theory and Practice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
2009 “The ‘Communication Concept’ and the ‘Language Concept’ in Everyday English.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 29 (1): 11–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011 “The Lexical Semantics of ‘Language’ (with Special Reference to ‘Words’).” Language Sciences 33 (1): 40–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014 “Jesus! vs. Christ! in Australian English: Semantics, Secondary Interjections and Corpus Analysis.” In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 55–77. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021 “Natural Semantic Metalanguage.” In The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Xu Wen, and John R. Taylor, 93–110. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, Anna Gladkova, and Zhengdao Ye
In press. “Ethnopragmatics (NSM Approach).” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture, 2nd edition ed. by Hans-Georg Wolf, and Frank Polzenhagen London Routledge
Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka
2014Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019 “Reported Speech as a Pivotal Human Phenomenon: Response to Spronck and Nikitina.” Linguistic Typology 23 (1): 167–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, Anna Wierzbicka, and Zhengdao Ye
2023 “The Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) Approach.” In Handbook of Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I, ed. by Fuyin Thomas Li, 99–137. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Anthony J. Liddicoat
eds. 2009Conceptualising Communication in Linguistics. Special Issue of Australian Journal of Linguistics 29 (1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vit Suchomel
2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years on.” Lexicography: Journal of ASIALEX 1 (1): 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levisen, Carsten
2024Postcolonial Semantics: Meaning and Metalanguage in a Multipolar World. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2025 “Axiologies of Speaking: Scandinavian Perspectives on Verbs of Verbality.” In Explorations in Applied Ethnolinguistics: Words, Cultures and Global Perspectives, ed. by Lauren Sadow, Kerry Mullan, and Cliff Goddard, 185–201. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H.
2003Linguistics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert
2003 “Le transculturel: Sémantique, pragmatique et axiologie.” La linguistique 39 (1): 119–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2024Langue, culture et valeurs. Vers une ethnolinguistique appliquée et applicable, ed. by Lauren Sadow, Kerry Mullan, and Christine Béal. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert, Lauren Sadow, Cliff Goddard, and Kerry Mullan
2025 “Language, Culture, and Values: Six Ways to See Them More Clearly.” In Explorations in Applied Ethnolinguistics: Words, Cultures and Global Perspectives, ed. by Lauren Sadow, Kerry Mullan, and Cliff Goddard, 9–36. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vorlat, Emma
1982 “Framing the Scene of Linguistic Action by Means of Speak .” In The Scene of Linguistic Action and its Perspectivization by SPEAK, TALK, SAY and TELL, ed. by René Dirven, Louis Goossens, Yvan Putseys, and Emma Vorlat, 9–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1996Semantics: Primes and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013Imprisoned in English: The Hazards of English as a Default Language. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue