Talking about things: Image-based topical talk and intimacy in video-mediated family communication

Moustafa ZouinarJulia Velkovska
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, and Orange Labs Paris | Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales and Orange Labs, Paris

Abstract

This paper focuses on how conversation and a shared participation frame are maintained in video-mediated family conversations which ordinarily do not have a particular agenda. In order to examine this question, how conversations are maintained whilst being sometimes improvised, the paper analyses a particular interactional phenomenon, namely, the image-based topic management accomplished via two methods: showings and noticings. Through a detailed multimodal analysis of family video mediated conversations, it shows how these methods are used for introducing or changing topics and hence sustaining talk. Moreover, by describing the practical actions that involve technological and social dimensions, the paper highlights the link between interaction, personal relationships and technology. The analysis of showings and noticings, enabled by the technical features of the systems used by the participants, reveals how video-communication technology is mobilized by family members as a resource for maintaining intimacy in distant relationships.

Keywords
Table of contents

Pragmatics  27:3 (2017), pp. 387–418. ISSN 1018-2101 | E-ISSN 2406-4238

© John Benjamins Publishing Company

Throughout the 20th century, video communication has been thought of as one of the symbols of cutting edge technological development, associated with values of modernity and innovation. Cinematic history offers fascinating insights to these visions starting with the famous first video call appearing as far back as 1927 when Fritz Lang showed one in his Metropolis; these have continued, in the following decades, with a variety of imagined technological representations, interactional situations as well as ambiguous and even contradictory social consequences that follow on from video mediated communication. On the one hand, in movies criticizing industrial capitalism, video communication is represented as a tool for surveillance and control of the working class that, along with other technologies (like assembly line work), is used by the rulers to guarantee their power and domination over the ruled. This was shown in the already mentioned Metropolis and in Chaplin’s Modern times (1936). This is especially apparent in Modern Times where the manager makes video calls and opens video screens in a sudden and unexpected manner for his subordinates. But on the other hand, in later futuristic visions, video communication also prefigures cutting edge scientific and technological achievements with positive social fallouts: for example, allowing a video call between a space station and the Earth as in Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Adato, A.
1980 “ ‘Occasionality’ as a Constituent Feature of the Known-in-Common Character of Topics”. Human Studies3: 47–64. doi: 10.1007/BF02331800
Button, G., and N. Casey
1984 “Generating Topic: The Use of Topic Initial Elicitors.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 165–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coupland, J.
(ed.) 2000Small talk. Essex, UK: Longman Harlow.
Coupland, J., and A. Jaworski
2003 “Transgression and Intimacy in Reconnaitre Talk Narratives.” Research on Language and Social interaction36: 85–106. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_5
Drew, P., and K. Chilton
2000 “Calling just to Keep in Touch: Regular and Habitualised Telephone Calls as an Environment for Small Talk.” In Small talk, ed. by J. Coupland, 137–162. Essex, UK: Longman Harlow.
Goffman, E.
1964 “The Neglected Situation.” American Anthropologist66: 133–6. doi: 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090
Jefferson, G.
1978a “What’s in a ‘Nyem’?Sociology12 (1): 135–139. doi: 10.1177/003803857801200109
1978b “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by J. N. Schenkein, 213–248. New York: Academic Press.
Kirk, D., A. Sellen, and X. Cao
2010 “Home Video Communication: Mediating Closeness.” Proceedings of CSCW: ACM Press: pp.135–144.
Levinson, S. C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Licoppe, C., and J. Morel
2014 “Mundane Video Directors in Interaction. Showing One’s Environment in Skype and Mobile Video Calls.” In M. Broth, E. Laurier, and L. Mondada (eds.), Studies of Video Practices, Video at Work, 135–160. London: Routledge.
Maynard, D. W.
1980 “Placement of Topic Choices in Conversation.” Semiotica30: 263–290. doi: 10.1515/semi.1980.30.3‑4.263
Maynard, D. W., and D. H. Zimmerman
1984 “Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships.” Social Psychology Quarterly, vol.47: 301–316. doi: 10.2307/3033633
Relieu, M.
2007 “La téléprésence, ou l’autre visiophonie.” In «De la rue au tribunal. Etudes sur la visiocommunication. Réseaux 144, ed. by C. Licoppe, and M. Relieu, 183–224. Paris: Hermès.
Radford, J. and C. Tarplee
2000 “The Management of Conversational Topic by a Ten Year Old Child with Pragmatic Difficulties.” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14: 5.
Sacks, H.
1992Lectures on Conversation. 2 vol., ed. by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
1984 “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary.’” In Structures of social action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A.
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist70 (6): 1075–1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
1990 “The Organization of Sequences as a Source of Coherence in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Conversational Organization and its Development, ed. by B. Dorval, 51–77. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Sunakawa, C.
2012 “Japanese Family via Webcam: An Ethnographic Study of Cross-Spatial Interactions.” In Lecture Notes, in Computer Science, vol. 7258, ed. by M. Okumura, D. Bekki, and K. Satoh, 264–276. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.