Cancellative discourse markers: A core/periphery approach

David M. Bell
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Abraham, W
(1976) But. Studia Linguistica 33.2: 89-119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, B
(1986) Contrastive linking in spoken and written English. In G. Tottie and I. Backlund (eds.), English in Speech and Writing: A Symposium. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International, pp. 13-40.Google Scholar
Anscombre, J.-C. and O. Ducrot
(1977) Deux mais en Francais? Lingua 43: 23-40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bar-Lev, Z. and A. Palacas
(1980) Semantic command over pragmatic priority. Lingua 51: 137-146. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bell, D
(1994) Cancellative discourse markers. Unpublished Ph.D. Boston University.
Blakemore, D
(1987) Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1989a) Linguistic form and pragmatic interpretation: The explicit and the implicit. In L. Hickey (ed.), The Pragmatics of Style. London: Routledge, pp. 28-51.Google Scholar
(1989b) Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis of “But.” Linguistics and Philosophy. 12: 15-37. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Borkin, A
(1980) On some conjunctions signaling dissonance in written expository English. Studia Anglica Posnanensia, 12: 47-59.Google Scholar
Carston, R
(1993) Conjunction, explanation and relevance. Lingua 90: 27-48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crewe, W.J
(1990) The illogic of logical connectives. ELT Journal 44.4: 316-325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dascal, M. and T. Katriel
(1977) Between semantics and pragmatics: Two types of “but” – Hebrew “aval” and “ela.”. Theoretical Linguistics 4: 143-172. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Foolen, A
(1991) Polyfunctionality and the semantics of adversative conjunctions. Multilingua 10: 79-92.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B
(1988) Types of English discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica. 38.(1–4): 19-33.Google Scholar
(1990) An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 383-395. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996) Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6.2: 167-190.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997a) Contrastive discourse markers in English. To appear in Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series: Discourse Markers.Google Scholar
(1997b) What are discourse markers? To appear in Journal of Pragmatics: Special Issue to honor Jacob Mey.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S
(1969) Studies in Adverbial Usage. Coral Gables, Fla.: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
Gunter, R
(1984) The conjunctive system of English. Language Sciences 6.1: 1-29.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
(1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hirtle, W.H
(1977) “Already,” “Still” and “Yet.” Archivum Linguisticum 8: 28-45.Google Scholar
Jesperson, O
(1940) A Modern English Grammar. Part V Syntax. Fourth Volume. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Katriel, T. and M. Dascal
(1984) What do indicating devices indicate? Philosophy and Rhetoric. 17.1: 1-15.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kempson, R
(1975) Presuppositions and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, E
(1988) Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Cross linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In J.A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 145-185.Google Scholar
Koenig, E. and E. Traugott
(1982) Divergence and apparent convergence in the development of “yet” and “still.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 170-180.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Longacre, R.E
(1983) The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R
(1971) If’s, and’s, and but’s about conjunction. In C.J. Fillmore and D.T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, pp. 115-50.  BoPGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. and R. Carter
(1994) Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Peters, P
(1985) Strategies for Student Writers. Brisbane: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Polanyi, L. and R. Scha
(1983) The syntax of discourse. Text 3: 261-270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), The structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-101.Google Scholar
Posner, R
(1980) Semantics and pragmatics of sentence connectives in natural language. In J.R. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch (eds.), Speech act theory and pragmatics. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel, pp. 169-203. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R
. et al. (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Redeker, G
(1990) Ideational and Pragmatic Markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367-381. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D
(1986) Functions of “and” in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 10: 41-66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schourup, L
(1985) Common discourse particles in English conversation: “like,” “well,” “y’know.” New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson
(1986) Relevance. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E
(1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E
(1986) On the origins of “and” and “but” connectives in English. Studies in Language 10-1: 137-150.
van Dijk, T.A
(1979) Pragmatic connectives. Journal of Pragmatics 3: 447-456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, R
(1985) Discourse connectives in English. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Wilson, D
(1994) Relevance and understanding. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjær, A. Pollitt, & J. Williams (eds.), Language and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar