This study explores the relevance of the concept of legal survivals, proposed by the legal scholar Rafał Mańko,
for legal translation purposes. The concept of legal survivals, in parallel to the well-known notion of legal transplants,
problematises a specific aspect of legal continuity, namely the continued existence of certain units of legal culture despite
transformations of a given jurisdiction’s legal system. Translating texts relating to such institutions raises difficult questions
for legal translators, who need to consider the legal and/or terminological changes to establish acceptable equivalents. This
article uses the translational comparative legal analysis framework to investigate the usefulness of Mańko’s theory for legal
translation through three case studies of the Polish–English translation of property law terms. The research shows that the legal
survivals theory may be useful in helping translators better comprehend the not-always-parallel paths of legal terminology and
legal institutions and encouraging a kind of ‘legal genealogy’.
Half a century ago, the first edition of Alan Watson’s (1974) seminal book
entitled Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law was published, marking the symbolic beginning of a new
field of enquiry in comparative law, which has since grown far beyond Watson’s original exposition (Cairns 2013, 638–639; Graziadei 2019, 443–444). With his book,
Watson opened up a novel perspective, seeking to demonstrate that most legal change actually results from the circulation of legal
rules across the boundaries of legal systems (Mańko 2013a, 1; 2024, 93). The phenomenon of legal transplants is defined as “a transfer of the normative content in its
legal form constituting functional entirety, having considerable load of normative novelty, or a transfer of a new method of legal
regulation, not yet present in a legal system, from one system of law (foreign) to another one (host)” (Król 2010, 10). Put more simply, the concept of legal transplant refers to the phenomena of legal solutions
being transferred between different legal systems. The legal transplant theory can be described as one of the central paradigms in
comparative law (Graziadei 2019, 443; Kusik
2024b). Indeed, identifying a certain legal transfer as a legal transplant can let one “gain access to the set of
analytical tools developed by legal transplant theorists” in order to “better understand the implications of legal transplants” (Gillman 2009, 301).
References
Bevans, Neal
R.
2016Real Estate and Property Law for
Paralegals. New York: Wolters
Kluwer.
Biel, Łucja, and Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski
2015 “Legal
Translation.” In Ways to Translation, edited
by Łukasz Bogucki, Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski, and Piotr Stalmaszczyk, 249–273. Łódź: Wydawnictwo
Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Biel, Łucja
2024 “Linguistic
Approaches.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative
Law, edited by Mathias Siems and Po
Jen Yap, 91–112. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Bridge, Michael
2015Personal
Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Brzozowski, Adam
2021 “Ogólne wiadomości o prawie rzeczowym [General information
about property law].” In Prawo rzeczowe. Zarys
wykładu [Property law: An outline of the
lecture], edited by Adam Brzozowski, Wojciech
J. Kocot, and Wiesław Opalski, 17–47. Warsaw: Wolters
Kluwer.
Cairns, John
W.
2013 “Watson, Walton, and the History
of Legal Transplants.” Georgia Journal of International & Comparative
Law 41: 637–696.
2014 “The
New Czech Civil Code: Lessons from Legal Translation — A Case-Study
Analysis.” In The Ashgate Handbook of Legal
Translation, edited by Le Cheng, King
Kui Sin, and Anne Wagner, 263–297. Farnham: Ashgate.
Clarke, Alison, and Paul Kohler
2005Property
Law: Commentary and Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Cohn, Margit
2010 “Legal
Transplant Chronicles: The Evolution of Unreasonableness and Proportionality Review of the Administration in the United
Kingdom.” American Journal of Comparative
Law 58 (3): 583–630.
2011 “Historical
Development of Private Law in Poland.” In Handbook of Polish
Law, edited by Wojciech Dajczak, Andrzej
J. Szwarc, and Paweł Wiliński, 42–58. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo
Szkolne PWN.
De
Cruz, Peter
1999Comparative
Law in a Changing
World. London: Cavendish.
De
Groot, Gérard-René
1987 “The
Point of View of a Comparative Lawyer.” Les Cahiers de
Droit [The law
journal] 28 (4): 793–812.
Dixon, Martin
2018Modern
Land
Law. Oxon: Routledge.
Dullion, Valérie
2015 “Droit comparé pour traducteurs: De la théorie à la didactique de la traduction
juridique [Comparative law for translators: From theory to the didactics of
legal translation].” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law — Revue internationale de
Sémiotique
juridique 28 (1): 91–106.
Engberg, Jan
2020 “Comparative
Law for Legal Translation: Through Multiple Perspectives to Multidimensional
Knowledge.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law — Revue internationale de Sémiotique
juridique 33 (2): 263–282.
Filipiak, Teresa
A.
2012 “Art.
228.” In Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Tom II. Własność i
inne prawa rzeczowe [The Civil Code: Commentary.
Volume II. Ownership and other property rights], edited by Andrzej Kidyba, 136–137. Warsaw: Wolters
Kluwer.
Gillman, Eric
2009 “Legal
Transplants in Trade and Investment Agreements: Understanding the Exportation of U.S. Law to Latin
America.” Georgetown Journal of International
Law 41: 263–301.
Gniewek, Edward
2022Prawo rzeczowe [Property
law]. Warsaw: C. H.
Beck.
Goldberg, John
C. P., and Benjamin
C. Zipursky
2010The
Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Torts. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Gondek, Michał
2006 “Poland.” In Elgar
Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, edited by Jan
M. Smits, 548–553. Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar.
Graziadei, Michele
2019 “Comparative
Law, Transplants, and Receptions.” In The Oxford Handbook of
Comparative Law, edited by Mathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann, 441–473. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Greaves, Valerian
E.
1934 “The Social-Economic Purpose of
Private Rights.” New York University Law Quarterly
Review 12 (2): 165–195.
Harvey, Malcolm
2002 “What’s
So Special about Legal
Translation?” Meta 47 (2): 177–185.
2019 “Comparative
Law and Comparative Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative
Law, edited by Mathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann, 289–319. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Kancelaria
‘Kuczek-Maruta’, Tomasz
Bil, Aleksandra Broniek, Aleksandra Cincio, Marcin Kiełbasa, Gerhard Dannemann, Susanna
Frederick Fischer, and Fryderyk Zoll
1977Language
of the Law in the Aspect of
Translation. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu
Warszawskiego.
Kischel, Uwe
2019Comparative
Law. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Kocot, Wojciech
J.
2021 “Treść i
wykonywanie własności [The content and exercise of
ownership].” In Prawo rzeczowe. Zarys
wykładu [Property law: An outline of the
lecture], edited by Adam Brzozowski, Wojciech
J. Kocot, and Wiesław Opalski, 65–91. Warsaw: Wolters
Kluwer.
Kozińska, Joanna
2018 “Art.
228.” In Kodeks Cywilny. Komentarz. Tom II. Własność i
inne prawa rzeczowe [The Civil Code: Commentary.
Volume II. Ownership and other property rights], edited by Mariusz Fras and Magdalena Habdas, 404–405. Warsaw: Wolters
Kluwer.
Król, Małgorzata
2010 “Legal
Culture and Legal Transplants.” In Rapports Polonais: XVIIIe Congrès
International de droit comparé, XVIIIth Congress of Comparative Law Washington,
25.VII–1.VIII.2010, edited by Biruta Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, 7–16. Łódź: Wydawnictwo
Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Królikowska, Katarzyna
2024 “Art.
228.” In Kodeks Cywilny.
Komentarz [The Civil Code:
Commentary], edited by Witold Borysiak. Warsaw: C.
H. Beck. Accessed April 25,
2024. https://sip.legalis.pl/
Kusik, Przemysław
2022 “English
Translation Equivalents of Selected Polish Partnership Types Revisited from the Perspective of Comparative
Law.” Lingua
Legis 30: 7–21.
Kusik, Przemysław
2023a “The
Right to the Environment? Article 4(1) of the Polish Environmental Protection Law Act from a Combined Comparative Law and
Polish–English Legal Translation Perspective.” Comparative
Legilinguistics 56: 195–221.
Kusik, Przemysław
2023bZastosowanie metod prawnoporównawczych w procesie tłumaczenia na przykładzie polsko-angielskiego przekładu
terminologii z zakresu prawa rzeczowego [The application of comparative law
methods in the translation process as exemplified by the Polish-English translation of property law
terminology]. PhD diss. University of
Warsaw.
Kusik, Przemysław
2024a “Comparative
Law in the Eyes of Translation Scholars. Is Legal Translation Really an Exercise of Comparative
Law?” HERMES — Journal of Language and Communication in
Business 64: 111–124.
Kusik, Przemysław
2024b “Teoria przeszczepów prawnych jako paradygmat prawa porównawczego. Próba podsumowania w 50. rocznicę ukazania się
monografii pt. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law Alana Watsona [The legal transplant theory as a paradigm of comparative law: An attempt at a summary on the 50th anniversary of
the publication of Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law by Alan
Watson].” Forum Prawnicze [The legal
forum] 3: 42–65.
Kusik, Przemysław
2025 “Legal
Transplants and Legal Translation: A Case Study of the Borrowing of the U.S. Limited Liability Partnership into the Polish
Legal
System.” Perspectives 33 (5): 930–945.
Law Commission
2011Making Land Work:
Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre. London: The
Stationery Office.
2013b “Weeds
in the Gardens of Justice? The Survival of Hyperpositivism in Polish Legal Culture as a
Symptom/Sinthome.” Pólemos 7 (2): 207–233.
Mańko, Rafał
2015a “Demons
of the Past? Legal Survivals of the Socialist Legal Tradition in Contemporary Polish Private
Law.” In Law and Critique in Central Europe: Questioning the Past,
Resisting the Present, edited by Rafał Mańko, Cosmin
Sebastian Cercel, and Adam Sulikowski, 66–89. Oxford: Counterpress.
Mańko, Rafał
2015b “Legal
Survivals: A Conceptual Tool for Analysing Post-Transformation Continuity of Legal
Culture.” In Tiesību efektivitāte postmodernā
sabiedrībā [The effectiveness of law in post-modern
society], edited by Jānis Rozenfelds, 16–27. Riga: Latvijas
Universitāte.
Mańko, Rafał
2015c “Relikty w kulturze prawnej. Uwagi metodologiczne na tle pozostałości epoki socjalizmu realnego w polskim prawie
prywatnym [Survivals in legal culture: Methodological remarks in the light
of the remnants of real socialism in Polish private law].” Przegląd Prawa i
Administracji [Law and administration
review] 102: 185–208.
Mańko, Rafał
2015d “The
Cooperative Member’s Proprietary Right to an Apartment: A Legal Survival of the Period of Actually Existing Socialism in
Polish Private Law.” Zeszyty Prawnicze [The legal
journal] 15 (4): 131–176.
Mańko, Rafał
2016a “Towards
a Typology of Dimensions of the Continuity and Discontinuity of Law: The Perspective of Polish Private Law after the 1989
Transformation.” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration &
Economics 6 (2): 108–120.
Mańko, Rafał
2016b “Transformacja ustrojowa a ciągłość instytucji prawnych — uwagi teoretyczne [Systemic transformation and the continuity of legal institutions: Theoretical
remarks].” Zeszyty Prawnicze [The legal
journal] 16 (2): 5–36.
Mańko, Rafał
2017a “Form
and Substance of Legal Continuity.” Zeszyty
Prawnicze [The legal
journal] 17 (2): 207–234.
Mańko, Rafał
2017b “Prawo użytkowania wieczystego jako pozostałość po epoce socjalizmu realnego — ujęcie
socjologicznoprawne [The right of perpetual usufruct as a survival of the
period of actually existing socialism: A socio-legal perspective].” Zeszyty
Prawnicze [The legal
journal] 17 (1): 33–61.
Mańko, Rafał
2017c “Wybrane relikty prawne epoki realnego socjalizmu w polskim prawie cywilnym — analiza zmiany funkcji społecznej
instytucji prawnych w następstwie transformacji ustrojowej [Selected legal
survivals of the period of actually existing socialism in Polish civil law: An analysis of the change of social function of
legal institutions as a consequence of systemic transformation].” Studia
Iuridica [Legal studies] 66: 207–235.
Mańko, Rafał
2024 “Legal
Transplants, Legal Survivals, and Legal Revivals: Towards a Reconceptualisation of the Circulation of Legal Forms in Time and
Space.” Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia
Iuridica [The journals of the University of Łódź:
Law] 109: 93–117.
Mańko, Rafał
2025 “Legal
Survivals and the Resilience of Juridical Form.” Law and
Critique 36: 67–89.
Mańko, Rafał, Martin Škop, and Markéta Štěpáníková
2016 “Carving
Out Central Europe as a Space of Legal Culture: A Way Out of Peripherality?” Wroclaw Review of
Law, Administration &
Economics 6 (2): 4–28.
2020 “A
Tentative Analysis of Legal Terminology Diachronic Changes and the Problem of Communication Effectiveness in Legal
Setting.” Semiotica, 236–237: 427–451.
Matulewska, Aleksandra
2017 “Socially
Induced Changes in Legal Terminology.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and
Rhetoric 49 (1): 153–173.
Matulewska, Aleksandra
2018 “Legal
Languages — A Diachronic Perspective.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and
Rhetoric 53 (1): 195–212.
Merrill, Thomas
W., and Henry
E. Smith
2010The
Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law:
Property. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Merryman, John
Henry, and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo
2007The
Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin
America. Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Michaels, Ralf
2006 “American
Law (United States).” In Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative
Law, edited by Jan
M. Smits, 66–77. Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar.
Miller, Jonathan
2003 “A
Typology of Legal Transplants: Using Sociology, Legal History and Argentine Examples to Explain the Transplant
Process.” The American Journal of Comparative
Law 51 (4): 839–885.
Morawski, Lech
2014Wstęp do prawoznawstwa [Introduction
to jurisprudence]. Toruń: Dom
Organizatora.
Nelken, David
2006 “Legal
Culture.” In Elgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative
Law, edited by Jan
M. Smits, 372–381. Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar.
Örücü, Esin
2002 “Law
as Transposition.” The International and Comparative Law
Quarterly 51 (2): 205–223.
Perrins, Bryn
2000Understanding
Land Law. London: Cavendish
Publishing.
Pommer, Sieglinde
2006Rechtsübersetzung und Rechtsvergleichung: Translatologische Fragen zur
Interdisziplinarität [Legal translation and
comparative law: Aspects of interdisciplinarity from a translational
perspective]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter
Lang.
Pozzo, Barbara
2012 “Comparative
Law and Language.” In The Cambridge Companion to Comparative
Law, edited by Matteo Bussani and Ugo Mattei, 88–113. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Prieto
Ramos, Fernando
2014 “Legal
Translation Studies as Interdiscipline: Scope and
Evolution.” Meta 59 (2): 260–277.
Rhodes, Chris, Lorna Booth, Jenny Brown, Louise Butcher, Daniel Harari, Mathew Keep, Federico Mor, and Edward Potton
2018Public
Ownership of Industries and Services. London: House of
Commons Library.
Richards, Paul
2014Land
Law. Harlow: Pearson.
Samuel, Geoffrey
2013A
Short Introduction to the Common Law. Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar.
Samuel, Geoffrey
2014An
Introduction to Comparative Law Theory and
Method. Oxford: Hart
Publishing.
Šarčević, Susan
1997New
Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law
International.
Seidler, Grzegorz
L.
1967 “W poszukiwaniu systemu
wszechstronnej analizy prawa [In search of a system of universal analysis of law].” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio G [The annals of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Section
G] 14 (1): 1–22.
Smith, Roger
J.
2014Property
Law. Harlow: Pearson.
Soriano-Barabino, Guadalupe
2016Comparative
Law for Legal Translators. Oxford: Peter
Lang.
2015 “Methodology
of Comparative Legal Research.” Law and
Method, 1–35.
Warner-Reed, Emma
2013Land
Law. Harlow: Pearson.
Watson, Alan
1974Legal
Transplants: An Approach to Comparative
Law. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic
Press.
Władek, Zbigniew
2016 “Klauzula generalna społeczno-gospodarczego przeznaczenia prawa w wykładni przepisów regulujących prawo
własności [The general clause of the socio-economic purpose of a right in
the interpretation of legal provisions governing ownership].” Annales Universitatis
Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio G [The annals of
the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Section
G] 63 (2): 117–134.
Yiannopoulos, Athanassios
N.
1962 “Movables and Immovables in
Louisiana and Comparative Law.” Louisiana Law
Review 22 (3): 517–579.