Gestural style of the interpreter impacts performance appraisal in public service settings
Public service interpreting can involve high-stakes situations in which multimodal information is key. Interpreters often mimic speakers’ gestures, which is paradoxically associated both with lack of professionalism and with fostering social harmony. This study investigates whether an interpreter’s gestural style affects users’ perceptions of professionalism, trustworthiness, and skill. Fifty-seven experiment participants watched two twelve-minute videos of a simulated English–Turkish parent–teacher conference. In one video, the interpreter used extensive gestures; in the other, she kept her hands still. The raters responded to a twelve-item questionnaire on professionalism, trustworthiness, fluency, experience, and likability. Statistical inference reveals that interpreters who used spontaneous gestures and gesturally aligned with speakers received significantly more positive ratings. These results suggest that visual input, such as an interpreter’s gestural style, plays a crucial role in third-party experiences of interpreter performance.
Keywords:
- public service interpreting,
- consecutive dialogue interpreting,
- gestural style,
- gestural alignment,
- co-speech gestures
Publication history
Table of contents
In contemporary approaches to interpreter-mediated communication, across modalities and settings, the relevance of embodied semiotic resources, such as eye gaze, facial expressions, and manual gestures is acknowledged as part of the interactional dynamics between interpreters and recipients of interpreting services. The study of visuospatial cues in interpreter-mediated exolingual interactions is gaining increasing attention (Davitti 2018). Multimodal corpora show gesture production as a crucial element in the set of semiotic resources used in dialogue interpreting (Vranjes and Brône 2021). Audiovisual data also reveal a vast idiosyncratic variability in interpreters’ gestural styles (Chwalczuk 2021). Yet, the way the gestural style of the interpreter impacts how their performance is perceived and received has not been subject to systematic analysis. The goal of this article is to investigate the extent to which the presence (or lack) of hand gestures produced by interpreters influences the appraisal of their performance in dialogue interpreting.
Funding
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under
the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement no. 847639. The CoGCIn Project (Cognitive Processes behind the Use of Gestures in Consecutive Dialogue Interpreting) was
conducted by Dr. Monika Chwalczuk as the Principal Investigator and carried out at the Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of
Sciences.
This article was made Open Access under a CC BY 4.0 license through payment of an APC by or on behalf of the authors.
References
Alter, Adam
L., and Daniel
M. Oppenheimer
2009 “Uniting
the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation.” Personality and Social Psychology
Review 13 (3): 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
Ardizzi, Martina, Mariateresa Sestito, Francesca Martini, Maria
Alessandra Umiltà, Roberto Ravera, and Vittorio Gallese
2014 “When
Age Matters: Differences in Facial Mimicry and Autonomic Responses to Peers’ Emotions in Teenagers and
Adults.” PLoS
ONE 9 (10): e110763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110763
Baraldi, Claudio, and Laura Gavioli
2012 Coordinating
Participation in Dialogue Interpreting. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.102
Bot, Hanneke
2005 Dialogue
Interpreting in Mental
Health. Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004458574
Cavents, Dries, and July
de Wilde
2023 “Face-Work
in Video Remote Interpreting: A Multimodal
Micro-Analysis.” In Interactional Dynamics in Remote
Interpreting, edited by Esther
de Boe, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets, 155–175. New
York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267867-8
Cavents, Dries, July
de Wilde, and Jelena Vranjes
2025 “Towards
a Multimodal Approach for Analysing Interpreter’s Management of Rapport Challenge in Onsite and Video Remote
Interpreting.” Journal of
Pragmatics 235: 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.12.003
Chartrand, Tanya
L., and Rick
van Baaren
2009 “Chapter
5. Human Mimicry.” In Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology 41: 219–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00405-X
Chwalczuk, Monika
2021 Co-Speech
Gestures in Public Service Interpreting: Contextual Analysis of Multimodal Corpora. PhD
thesis. Université Paris Cité.
2022 “Construction
of Shared Semantic Spaces through Gestures in Interpreter-Mediated Psychotherapy
Sessions.” International Visual Culture
Review 9 (2): 207–221. https://doi.org/10.37467/gkarevvisual.v9.2933
2025 “Interpreters’
Gestural Profiles across Settings: A Corpus-based Analysis of Healthcare, Educational and Police
Interactions.” Parallèles 37 (1): 105–123.
Cienki, Alan
2024 “Variable
Embodiment of Stance-Taking and Footing in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Frontiers in
Psychology 15: 1429232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1429232
Corriero, Elena
F.
2017 “Counterbalancing.” In The
SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, edited by Mike Allen, 278–281. Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Davitti, Elena, and Sergio Pasquandrea
2017 “Embodied
Participation: What Multimodal Analysis Can Tell Us about Interpreter-Mediated Encounters in Pedagogical
Settings.” Journal of
Pragmatics 107: 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.008
Davitti, Elena
2019 “Methodological
Explorations of Interpreter-Mediated Interaction: Novel Insights from Multimodal
Analysis.” Qualitative
Research 19 (1): 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118761492
De
Boe, Esther, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets
2023 Interactional
Dynamics in Remote Interpreting. New
York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267867
De
Boe, Esther
2023 “Synchronization
of Interaction in Healthcare Interpreting by Video Link and
Telephone.” In Interactional Dynamics in Remote
Interpreting, edited by Esther
de Boe, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets, 22–41. New
York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267867-2
De
Stefani, Elisa, Ylenia Nicolini, Mauro Belluardo, and Pier
Francesco Ferrari
2019 “Congenital
Facial Palsy and Emotion Processing: The Case of Moebius Syndrome.” Genes, Brain and
Behavior 18 (1): e12548. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12548
Ekman, Paul, and Wallace
V. Friesen
1969 “The
Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and
Coding.” Semiotica 1 (1): 49–98. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
Enfield, N. J.
2005 “The
Body as a Cognitive Artifact in Kinship Representations.” Current
Anthropology 46 (1): 51–81. https://doi.org/10.1086/425661
Englund
Dimitrova, Birgitta
1997 “Degree
of Interpreter Responsibilty in the Interaction Process in Community
Interpreting.” In The Critical Link: Interpreters in the
Community, edited by Silvana
E. Carr, Roda
P. Roberts, Aideen Dufour, and Dini Steyn, 147–164. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.19.17eng
Forster, Michael, Helmut Leder, and Ulrich Ansorge
2013 “It
Felt Fluent, and I Liked It: Subjective Feeling of Fluency Rather than Objective Fluency Determines
Liking.” Emotion 13 (2): 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030115
Galvão, Elena
Zagar, and Isabel
Galhano Rodrigues
2010 “The
Importance of Listening with One’s Eyes: A Case Study of Multimodality in Simultaneous
Interpreting.” In New Insights into Audiovisual Translation and Media
Accessibility, edited by Jorge
Díaz Cintas, Anna Matamala, and Josélia Neves, 239–253. Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042031814_018
García
Becerra, Olalla, E.
Macarena
Pradas Macías, and Rafael Barranco-Droege
eds. 2013 Quality
in Interpreting: Widening the Scope. Volume
1. Granada: Editorial
Comares.
García-Beyaert, Sofia
2021 “Framing
the Societal Value of Community Interpreting.” QScience
Connect 3: art. 6. https://doi.org/10.5339/connect.2021.tii.6
Gerwing, Jennifer, and Shuangyu Li
2019 “Body-Oriented
Gestures as a Practitioner’s Window into Interpreted Communication.” Social Science &
Medicine 233: 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.040
Gibbon, Dafydd
2005 “Spoken
Language Lexicography: An Integrative Framework.” Forum
Translationswissenschaft 5: 247–289.
Holewik, Katarzyna
2020 “Peer
Feedback and Reflective Practice in Public Service Interpreter Training.” Theory and Practice
of Second Language
Acquisition 6 (2): 133–159. https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.7809
Holler, Judith, and Katie Wilkin
2011 “Co-Speech
Gesture Mimicry in the Process of Collaborative Referring During Face-to-Face
Dialogue.” Journal of Nonverbal
Behavior 35 (2): 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-011-0105-6
Iriskhanova, Olga
K., Alan Cienki, Maria
V. Tomskaya, and Alina
I. Nikolayeva
2023 “Silent,
but Salient: Gestures in Simultaneous Interpreting, Research Result.” Theoretical and Applied
Linguistics 9 (1): 99–114.
Iriskhanova, Olga
K., and Alan Cienki
2018 “The
Semiotics of Gestures in Cognitive Linguistics: Contributions and Challenges.” Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki [Issues of
cognitive
linguistics] 4: 25–36. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2018-4-25-36
Kalina, Sylvia
2005 “Quality
Assurance for Interpreting
Processes.” Meta 50 (2): 768–784. https://doi.org/10.7202/011017ar
Kendon, Adam
2004 Gesture:
Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572
Kimbara, Irene
Kita, Sotaro, Jacob Barker, and Jiahao Yang
Forthcoming. “Gestures
in Advertisement: Self-Oriented Study.”
Klammer, Martina, and Franz Pöchhacker
2021 “Video
Remote Interpreting in Clinical Communication: A Multimodal Analysis.” Patient Education and
Counseling 104 (12): 2867–2876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.024
Krystallidou, Demi
2014 “Gaze
and Body Orientation as an Apparatus for Patient Inclusion into/Exclusion from a Patient-Centred Framework of
Communication.” The Interpreter and Translator
Trainer 8 (3): 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.972033
Leonteva, Anna
V., Alan Cienki, and Olga
V. Agafonova
2023 “Metaphoric
Gestures in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Russian Journal of
Linguistics 27 (4): 820–842. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-36189
Licoppe, Christian, and Clair-Antoine Veyrier
2020 “The
Interpreter as a Sequential Coordinator in Courtroom Interaction ‘Chunking’ and the Management of Turn Shifts in Extended
Answers in Consecutively Interpreted Asylum Hearings with Remote
Participants.” Interpreting 22 (1): 56–86. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00034.lic
Licoppe, Christian
2023 “Consecutive
Interpreting and Embodied Sequences: Showing Evidence at a Distance in a Video-Mediated Courtroom
Setting.” In Interactional Dynamics in Remote
Interpreting, edited by Esther
de Boe, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets, 135–154. New
York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267867-7
Martín de
León, Celia, and Elena
Zagar Galvão
2025 “Making
Gestures inside and outside the Booth: A Comparative
Study.” Parallèles 37 (1): 8–28.
Mason, Ian
2012 “Gaze,
Positioning and Identity in Interpreter-Mediated
Dialogues.” In Coordinating Participation in Dialogue
Interpreting, edited by Claudio Baraldi and Laura Gavioli, 177–200. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.102.08mas
McIntosh, Daniel
N., Aimee Reichmann-Decker, Piotr Winkielman, and Julia
L. Wilbarger
2006 “When
the Social Mirror Breaks: Deficits in Automatic, but Not Voluntary, Mimicry of Emotional Facial Expressions in
Autism.” Developmental
Science 9 (3): 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00492.x
McNeill, David
1992 Hand
and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about
Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Mondada, Lorenza
2016 “Challenges
of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction.” Journal of
Sociolinguistics 20 (3): 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177
Movavi. Movavi Video Editor 2023. Version
23.4.1
Müller, Cornelia, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill, and Sedinha Tessendorf
eds. 2013 Body
— Language — Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human
Interaction. Berlin: De
Gruyter.
Muniak, Paweł, and Wojciech Kulesza
2024 “The
Impact of Mimicry Behavior on Guilt.” Social Psychological
Bulletin 19: e12697. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.12697
Neufeld, Janina, Christina Ioannou, Sebastian Korb, Leonhard Schilbach, and Bhismadev Chakrabarti
2016 “Spontaneous
Facial Mimicry Is Modulated by Joint Attention and Autistic Traits.” Autism
Research 9 (7): 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1573
Oben, Bert, and Geert Brône
2016 “Explaining
Interactive Alignment: A Multimodal and Multifactorial Account.” Journal of
Pragmatics 104: 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.002
Paivio, Allan
2013 Imagery
and Verbal Processes. New York: Psychology
Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315798868
Parrill, Fey, and Irene Kimbara
2006 “Seeing
and Hearing Double: The Influence of Mimicry in Speech and Gesture on Observers.” Journal of
Nonverbal
Behavior 30 (4): 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-006-0014-2
Pasquandrea, Sergio
2011 “Managing
Multiple Actions through Multimodality: Doctors’ Involvement in Interpreter-Mediated
Interactions.” Language in
Society 40 (4): 455–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404511000479
2012 “Co-Constructing
Dyadic Sequences in Healthcare Interpreting: A Multimodal Account.” New Voices in Translation
Studies 8 (1): 132–157.
Peirce, Jonathan, Jeremy
R. Gray, Sol Simpson, Michael MacAskill, Richard Höchenberger, Hiroyuki Sogo, Erik Kastman, and Jonas
Kristoffer Lindeløv
2019 “PsychoPy2:
Experiments in Behavior Made Easy.” Behavior Research
Methods 51 (1): 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Pöchhacker, Franz
2002 “Quality
Assessment in Conference and Community
Interpreting.” Meta 46 (2): 410–425. https://doi.org/10.7202/003847ar
Poyatos, Fernando
1997 “The
Reality of Multichannel Verbal-Nonverbal Communication in Simultaneous and Consecutive
Interpretation.” In Nonverbal Communication and Translation: New
Perspectives and Challenges in Literature, Interpretation and the Media, edited
by Fernando Poyatos, 249–282. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.17.21poy
Roy, Cynthia
B.
2000 Interpreting as a Discourse
Process. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Seleskovitch, Danica, and Marianne Lederer
2014 Interpréter Pour Traduire [Interpreting for translating]. Paris: Les Belles
Lettres.
Skaaden, Hanne
2016 “Professionalization
and Trust in Public Sector Interpreting.” International Journal of Language, Translation and
Intercultural
Communication 5: 56–66. https://doi.org/10.12681/ijltic.10654
Van
Schaik, Johanna
E., and Sabine Hunnius
2018 “Modulating
Mimicry: Exploring the Roles of Inhibitory Control and Social Understanding in 5-Year-Olds’ Behavioral
Mimicry.” PLOS
ONE 13 (3): e0194102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194102
Van
Swol, Lyn M., and Meghann
L. Drury-Grogan
2017 “The
Effects of Shared Opinions on Nonverbal Mimicry.” SAGE
Open 7 (2): 215824401770724. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017707243
Vranjes, Jelena
2023 “Where
to Look? On the Role of Gaze in Regulating Turn-Taking in Video Remote
Interpreting.” In Interactional Dynamics in Remote
Interpreting, edited by Esther
de Boe, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets, 113–134. New
York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267867-6
Vranjes, Jelena, and Geert Brône
2021 “Interpreters
as Laminated Speakers: Gaze and Gesture as Interpersonal Deixis in Consecutive Dialogue
Interpreting.” Journal of
Pragmatics 181: 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.008
Vranjes, Jelena, and Hanneke Bot
2021 “Optimizing
Turn-Taking in Interpreter-Mediated Therapy: On the Importance of the Interpreter’s Speaking
Space.” The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting
Research 13 (1): 101–117. https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.113201.2021.a06
Vranjes, Jelena, Geert Brône, and Kurt Feyaerts
2018 “On
the Role of Gaze in the Organization of Turn-Taking and Sequence Organization in Interpreter-Mediated
Dialogue.” Language and
Dialogue 8 (3): 439–467. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00025.vra
Vranjes, Jelena, Hanneke Bot, Kurt Feyaerts, and Geert Brône
2018 “Displaying
Recipiency in an Interpreter-Mediated Dialogue.” In Eye-Tracking in
Interaction: Studies on the Role of Eye Gaze in Dialogue, edited by Geert Brône and Bert Oben, 303–324. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.10.12vra
2019 “Affiliation
in Interpreter-Mediated Therapeutic
Talk.” Interpreting 21 (2): 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00028.vra
Wadensjö, Cecilia
1998 Interpreting
as
Interaction. London: Routledge.
2001 “Interpreting
in Crisis: The Interpreter’s Position in Therapeutic
Encounters.” In Triadic Exchanges: Studies in Dialogue
Interpreting, edited by Ian Mason, 71–85. Manchester: St
Jerome.
2004 “Dialogue
Interpreting: A Monologising Practice in a Dialogically Organised
World.” Target 16 (1): 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.16.1.06wad